@Unixbigot @cinebox @aaron @allrite For noise cancellation what matters is that it be external to the headphones and easily predictable by a simple sampling method.
And it is "noise" in the technical sense of being "additive noise"—that is, it is something that needs to be subtracted from the received signal to recover the original signal.
So there. :)
I don't know what methods they are using these days. Probably stuff like maximum entropy just as in decades past.
@lritter @cinebox @aaron @Unixbigot @allrite
Over an infinite timespan, the fourier spectrum will be the same for white noise as it will be for sparse random impulses. The distribution of sample values doesn't matter, even if 99% are zeroes; only that they are uncorrelated across time.
A comb-shaped spectrum corresponds to a train of pulses spaced at regular intervals, but an uncorrelated process like radioactive decay will create a flat spectrum.
@funranium might know... :D
@baer have you tried the mantles¹ for gas lanterns?
@afx @Unixbigot even before earbuds, I've had to deal with many people over the years wearing headphones working in a lab that used auditory warnings.
A "realistic" superhero origin wouldn't be someone trapped in an experiment that couldn't be opened, but someone working behind a piece of equipment that went unnoticed and didn't hear warnings to clear out of experiment area.