That comment seems to me odd and somewhat hostile. How did you mean it? Was there something you wanted to explain or accomplish?
@cy and the moment anyone says anything close to "that black lover" and isn't then thrown out, you get the fuck up leave and never go back. It ain't difficult, yo.
The difference here is you can't exactly not go back to the bar you run. Nip it in the bud
@egg_ @cy wtf? So all nazis have the kind of purchasing power that they just fucking own the bar lol?? No. It's like it is in the meme more often than in your comment, which I guess it can be sometimes, I've just never seen it.
More often than any, the bar was a normie bar to begin with, not a crustpunk bar, & became a nazi bar by a) tolerating nazis and b) kicking out anybody who made the nazis feel unwelcome or confronted them in any way.
So supposing a Nazi _did_ buy the bar, and install a Nazi-friendly bartender.
How are you thinking it would help them that this other story exists? Or to put it another way, what would be different for a Nazi who'd read the story?
E.g. is it that you think it would "give them ideas"?
Is it more like, you think they might need or use someone else's story like this in order to "justify" kicking out the people they don't like?
"accepting that good people are bad when the right labels are applied" is not a good idea for sure. That isn't what's being recommended in the story, though.
Even though an obvious element of the story is the kicking-out, an equally important element is that the bartender was able to recognise from experience the Nazi symbols the bloke was wearing, which the narrator hadn't spotted.
And yes, the narrator does take the bartender's word for that on this occasion. But the implication of the way it's told is that the narrator _could_ have seen what the bartender saw, if they'd looked at the right time.
So the implicit invitation of the story isn't "always take the word of bartenders about who is a bad person". It's "develop your own discernment so that you too can spot Nazis early on, before they get settled in".
@cy @unchartedworlds a consistent disregard for the well being of the working class really helps, too. When times are tough for long enough, people start believing their bullshit. They say "I don't like him but" about fascists, but they vote all the same.
This is what's happening in Portugal. Austerity has destroyed people's living conditions. Our (almost) 2-party system fixes nothing of it. The fascists will fix nothing either, but they're happy to capitalise on the discontent to get voters.
@cy @unchartedworlds austerity was enforced by the IMF and the unelected European commission. Not sure if fascism or imperialism.
Our prime minister at the time is likely a fascist but he couldn't have stopped it or caused it. He just made it worse lol, and made fun of my people's complaints. Called us whiny.
So, in your view, is it that there wouldn't have been any risk in allowing the first Nazi to stay and buy drinks, because the other patrons wouldn't have liked him anyway, and that would be enough to discourage the first Nazi from coming back with his Nazi friends? I.e. people's general dislike of Nazis would mean there was really no need to set an _explicit_ boundary of Nazis not being welcome there?
"Unrealistic"? Maybe it's just that you haven't personally experienced that kind of thing?
Here's another discussion of that same story. See e.g. the comment about the tattoo artist, and the examples of bars changing clientele:
https://www.reddit.com/r/TalesFromYourServer/comments/hsiisw/kicking_a_nazi_out_as_soon_as_they_walk_in/
If you think zero tolerance for white supremacists is a good idea, does that mean you agree that the bartender in the story handled the situation basically correctly? Is it that you're disagreeing with some of how they explained their reasoning, but you think they were right not to let the Nazi-symbols person stay and buy drinks?
So the "scenario is unrealistic because the first Nazi would never have the guts to show up" except also they "want to be kicked out, so they can act like the bartender is persecuting them". And "the Nazi you have to worry about is the one dressed in normal clothes", & Chevron means you "couldn't care less", but it's still "overall better to kick them out before they start escalating". And "sure, punch the Nazi walking around", but if you're telling them to leave, do it "with compassion".
Seems like you've disagreed with me so many different ways, you've ended up disagreeing with yourself as well.
Now you've explained, I can see why you'd be antsy about the element which is "A kicks out B, then C accepts A's explanation even though C didn't personally see the evidence".
But if you were in a similar position in real life, quite often you _would_ be able to see the evidence. You'd be able to set your own eyes on the Nazi symbols; you'd be able to research & verify that they really were symbols in use by Nazis.
If anything, the story's encouraging you to know & notice those things.
You. Out.
thats exactly how nazis operate. They're like a communicable disease.
Drive them out everywhere, every day...
@vantablack
reminds me of my favorite crustpunk bar
Actually had to help the bartender kick out a Nazi because that scumbag was already causing problems from the get go, got free drinks for the rest of the evening^^
from that point on the bartender stopped ignoring me :3
@vantablack
The tricky thing about fascists is that they don't even believe those "reasonable arguments." Fascists will say literally anything if they think it will help them gain power; words are meaningless to them.
For example, they'll talk a big game about something like "free speech absolutism," but the very first thing they do when they gain power is stifle free speech. Taking them seriously when they claim to care about something is a sucker's game.
@olibois @vantablack there is only a paradox of you assume that tolerance is a moral imperative.
If you treat tolerance as the social contract that it is, the paradox disappears. "Should I follow the contract restrictions even when the other person is breaking the contract?" Is a question we all know the answer to.
That is exactly how it happens. Exactly.
@vantablack This happened with bikers at a Canadian legion recently. A legion is a bar for veterans, and it has a charter. Anyone can come in and drink though. Eventually, they had to close the legion and cancel the charter because it wasn't safe anymore. Now the old guys who served our country have lost something important to them. No consequences for the bikers though. That legion was open for 75 years.
@vantablack At a ren fair I went to recently (after not having gone for…years? Half a decade?) I remember walking past a jewelry stand with a bunch of symbols like Celtic crosses, Thor’s hammer, that sorta stuff, and at the base was a large sign stating that these pagan/religious symbols did NOT belong to white supremacy and the sellers reserved the right to reject any sales.
One of those conflicted moments where I’m glad it was clearly stated and sad it was necessary…
@vantablack meanwhile in the UK we seem to prefer to sack the bartender who objects to the nazis. This just in:
I am no 223 to share this.
Thank you for posting this allegory.
Germany in a nut shell
"Evil, unchecked, spreads like cancer."
SearingTruth