Because raising pay for someone who makes less than me sounds like giving someone else something while giving me nothing. Capping the pay of someone who makes more than me sounds like lowering the ceiling above me.
Never mind that I am never getting anywhere near that ceiling, and would be much better off if the other guy's floor got raised instead. A true free-market idiot accepts the risk of having nothing if there is no limit to how rich he could be.
Yes, it is dumb.
@rbreich There are 13,544 McDonald's in the United States, that salary is $1,417 per restaurant or 0.3 cents per customer. That's not a lot.
If he's the global CEO it's 0.08 cents per customer. That's tiny.
The CEO's buddy owns the newspaper 🤷
(Edit: I know you know I just hate these hypotheticals because we all know why we don't end up having those discussions.)
@rbreich
I think this "cut to the chase" method of exposing misdirected arguments should be known as:
"Reich's razor" , because Robert Reich is so adept at it.
@rbreich probably because they sell like 900 million Big Macs every year, so even if the CEO's pay was solely funded by Big Mac sales, it would still only be 2.3 cents per burger. Put another way the CEO's salary was .14% of McDonalds operating costs for 2023.
What's noteworthy is that they had a net income of over $8bn with a 33% margin. They can afford to pay more and still be profitable without raising prices. The CEO's pay doesn't really matter to the people cooking the food.
If businesses can’t afford to pay a living wage, they are not a viable business 🤷
@rbreich Because McDonald's sells ~550 Million Bic Macs and employs ~1,3 Million people in the US alone.
The CEO's pay comes to ~0.035$ per Big Mac. Assuming a pay raise for every employee of just 1000$/year (0.5$/h at 8h/d, 250d/y), amounts to 1,3 bn$/year or ~2,3$/Big Mac.
Don't get me wrong. I am all for raising the wage of workers. It's just that 19,2M$/y is surprisingly low, e.g. compared to Elons ridiculous 56bn$ bonus.
@rbreich probably a better question is how much of a Big Mac is labor anyway? Surely the cows are the losers here, but that aside, if 20% is labor, doubling wages doubles wages but we’d only expect a 20% price increase. All and all, if everyone did this, we’d all win out and the economy would get a nice stimulus. Slowly starving workers until all the costs are raw materials just leads to no customers.
Obviously it isn’t quite that simple. Companies will want to protect their margins, so if cost go up, profit will have to too! They won’t complain about that part, to be sure.