offf, this story about how Google made google search into a pile of seagull shit hits me hard:

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/

Around the time of this story, I was living through a similar situation in my work life (on a much smaller scope, of course,
WordPress.com first, Tumblr later).

Back in 2019, working on WordPress, I started finding myself, almost weekly, arguing against people who wanted to take the product we were working at and made it worse if that mean they could squeeze 0.1% more revenue from it

The 0.1% figure is not even a random number: I remember this speciffic A/B test on
WordPress.com that was declared a success and shipped to 100% of the users because it increased the free-to-paid conversion by 0.1%. Soon after it was released, I found out that as a side effect, it increased the churn of free users by 20 something %,so I called for an urgent rollback and removal of the change. So I was promptly explained that we didn't care about free-users churn, because finance had calculated the average long-term value of the free users to be something like $2 per year, and the increase in conversion was bigger than what we could get from them.

Everything became about growth hacking. Everything became thinly-veiled dark patterns. In our private dev slack channels, we joked that since it was impossible to make it smaller or less conspicuous, the next thing the growth team was going to ask us to do was to make the 'free plan' button flee away from the mouse pointer when the user tried to click it. We kept making our product worse, we kept consciously crippling the cheaper versions so we could force people to move to the more expensive options.

Back then I was the lead of one of the two dev divisions working on
WordPress.com, so my job was mainly to discuss what we were going to be doing, when and how. And I was getting drained by a constant state of fight against a constant wave of shit they wanted us to build. So much than by the end of 2020, the CEO quietly told me to follow the growth team plans and shut up or step down.

So I requested to move to tumblr, because I thought the pastures were greener over there. But it was all the same: Adding login walls to what we were pretending to be "the last bastion of the free internet", cramping in embarrasingly obvious money-making schemes disguised as features, and making them silently opt-out instead of opt-in so the less people the possible would deactivate them, having to fend off the pressure from the CEO to make everything algorithmic timelines because, you know, tiktok makes a lot of money and why aren't we, etc etc.

I found myself in a place where building something good that people enjoy using was no longer a priority, but tricking people into generating more money for the company was. And when I looked around me, I could see that happening everywhere else, not only in my company. Experiencing the start of the enshittification years from inside wasn't easy.

And, as in the article, the people who decided to turn the shit-metter up to 200%, have a name, in every case. And these people, no matter if they are called Sundar and Prabhakar or Matt and Mark, are destroying the internet. These people are milllionaires, or billionaries, and are destroying our shared, common spaces to squeeze some extra cash from us.

That's why the fediverse and its principles are important. Because that's how we take back internet from their dirty hands. That's how we make internet resilient against them. That's how we build the commons.
The Man Who Killed Google Search

Wanna listen to this story instead? Check out this week's Better Offline podcast, "The Man That Destroyed Google Search," available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts. UPDATE: Prabhakar has now been deposed as head of search, read here for more details. This is the story

Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At
@javi What was the WP "feature" you're talking about? What is the reason for being coy about it?
oh, WordPress.com development is mostly open source, so if I'm too speciffic, anyone could go to github and find the single PR where that change was shipped, etc. I don't want to put anyone under the spotlight, specially engineers who were just doing what they were told to do. Also, it's just one example of many, the only thing interesting about that particular example is that I complained about it and I got told about the 'free user value' calculation.
But well, on broad strokes, it was about making it harder to tell which features were paid and which ones were free during onboarding. So a lot of people who wanted to create an account to host a free blog, found themselves being redirected to the shopping cart and asked to pay for things they have selected thinking they were free.
WordPress, Your Way

Create your site. Share your voice. Earn online.

WordPress.com
@javi
Pretty sure price-obscuring practices are illegal both in the UK and EU, but I suspect that "feature" wasn't region-locked away from places it was banned?
@jamienk
@javi I have to admit, I’ve been wondering why WordPress is gotten progressively harder to deal with over the last five years. Like most users, I blamed myself. Thank you for being open and honest about this. It is such a relief.
@javi After reading @scalzi laud his Wordpress.com experience, I was seriously considering moving from a self-hosted instance I maintain and update regularly to Wordpress where they'll do it all. I just supply the content. Since my content is static and I have no users or comments, there's nothing to manage beyond the site itself. You've convinced me that moving to Wordpress.com would be a waste of time and money. Thanks.
@mvilain @javi @scalzi
If your static content is already self-hosted (using WordPress Dot Org) then it might be worth replacing the default "Famous Five Minute Install ™©®" of WP with a cached copy or static site generator, and have the WP PHP files somewhere else, like a subdomain hosted on the same server or a machine on your LAN.
Then you're the only one able to hammer on the real WP login, and you aren't getting daily nag emails from a security plugin.
@dec23k @javi @scalzi I don't get nag emails as I use SUCRI SCANNER security plug. It allows me to hide my admin login. Works great.
@javi of course Sundar Pichai worked at McKinsey, ffs
@javi I wish this article didn't ring so true. Google and Youtube used to be joys to use. Now, if what you want isn't in the top six or so results, it's a pain in the neck to find!

@javi this has a name: capitalism.

And it does this to the entire planet.

@javi an article about enshittification, published on a page with THREE dialogs (including a popup!) begging to subscribe to a newsletter. Isn't it ironic? 😉

p.s: thanks for sharing your Wordpress story!

@andreagrandi @javi
Looks like Substack, that one has a nazi problem instead
it's not substack, if you scroll down to the footer says it's Ghost
@javi
Ah, that's good then, better not support Substack 👍
@javi you know, people stress about how to fund open source development; but seeing how desperate commercial software firms are, and all the layoffs and stuff - I'm more worried about how *they're* supposed to be sustainable.
The worst thing is that they are sustainable already. Google is one of the biggest money-making machines the humanity has seen. WordPress.com, on its own, was also profitable. But it's the classic "you know what's better than 100 millions in profit? one billion!" situation.
WordPress, Your Way

Create your site. Share your voice. Earn online.

WordPress.com
@javi sure, the big established names do, but then they do all the usual monopoly moat-building tricks to make it as hard as possible for potential competitors to turn a profit

@javi

Its all to do with share holders. They don't care about the customers or the company or the product. They have brought a share of what could basically be anything to them and all they care about is that they can sell the share at a better value before enshitification makes the shares nose dive.

@kitten_tech

@monkeyben @javi or short the shares as they dive...

I worry about this, as my pension is invested in shares. I'm part of the problem! I don't have time to manage a diversified portfolio and all that; the standard advice is to shove it all into an index tracker. There are things calling themselves "ESG funds" that try to be index trackers filtering out "evil" companies (weapons, petrochem, tobacco?) but what I really WANT to invest in is non-evil companies with sustainable business models...

@javi because "making an absurd amount of money every year with a successful product actually means you're a failing company if it isn't also an ungodly amount more than last year", fuck capitalism and its infinite growth brain worms, they'll a) destroy every good thing they're allowed near because they literally can't let it stand as is, and b) chew up the planet in the process :S
@javi let them enshittify, maybe that will allow a million other things to grow.
@javi #thanks #greed "I found myself in a place where building something good that people enjoy using was no longer a priority, but tricking people into generating more money for the company was."
@javi Sounds like Boeing, but of the internet services.

@ariaflame @javi I was just about to say:

tl:dr The internet's becoming Boeing

@javi

>ratfucked by a series of rotten careerists trying to please Wall Street

Every company using these consultancies must have some form of infection, causing them to no longer trust the most knowledgeable individuals who have poured heart and soul into their products.

Nobody really needs overpriced, plagiarism riddled, reports from highly praised frauds to justify moral corruption.

Sadly most smaller organisations follow along in worst practices every step of the way every time.

@javi I used to use WordPress and never bought it because the free version was so bad.
@javi What this reminds me of is the old days in telecom when companies would do anything to get one more second of revenue out of every connection, because if you did it a million times, you made $10,000.

@javi agree with everything you say here except that it's the folks at the top to blame.

They're also just doing it for their higher-ups: for the stakeholders, for their investors; and in the end for capitalism. It's a systemic problem, isn't it?

oh well, yeah it is. But in my particular case, the main stakeholder is also the guy at the top, so same thing. But generaly speaking yeah, you are right... that's why I think the fediverse is so important and why I finished my post talking about that: The corporate-based internet is not savageable, we need internet to be a place built by people, not huge corporations.
@javi fediverse, self-hosted blogs, codeberg, .. I'm with you there! 🤝 That's the bio-diversity we need for nature but for cyber! 🌱
Hey @onepict this post might interest you...
@javi the last bastion of the free internet is Craigslist, which I hope will never change

@Will @javi I put two things for sale on CL recently. I didn't get any hits, so I lowered the price. Still no hits. So I thought, maybe people just aren't using CL anymore? As an experiment I tried putting those two things on (my wife's) facebook marketplace. I immediately got interest. Every single one of those turned out to be scammers. I waited. No further interest via FB.

Eventually, one item sold through craigslist (the other item, my kids decided to keep). Am glad to see it still alive!

@Andres4NY @javi I recently sold my Argo bike on Craigslist, and had a modest pace of genuine interest, no scammers, and ultimately sold it to a neighbor for asking price who saw it there. I also got a great Bridgestone XO-4 there and have bought a few other bikes that way in recent years.

@Will @Andres4NY @javi

I recently had to do a dunging-out to make room for contractors to come in for an electrical upgrade.

I'm too old & tired to deal with the work involved in selling something for a price that wouldn't pay for the work, so I typically just give stuff away for free,† and it's *astonishing* what you can unload that way.

† In my mind, my "payment" is 1. reclaiming the space the item took up in my house & 2. getting to a proper home instead of going to landfil.

@javi

Every time I start thinking of getting back into I.T., I read something like this 😥

There needs to be an information workers union to tell companies that we won't make garbage changes like that.

@javi tbh i feel like i got a lucky roll with job. i just write software for within the company, ofc no enshittification there, if we screw over our users we're doing a bad job

@javi

TikTok is a Chinese psyop. That's not just some conspiracy theory. There are scientific studies showing that the algorithm is literally designed to funnel non-Chinese users into videos of harmful behavior, suicide, depression and other mental health dangers. Why non-Chinese? Because Chona has its own version, and theirs is designed to show users good health habits and obedience. Not great (the obedience part), but still light-years ahead of training the youth of other countries to hurt or kill themselves.

Any C-class following that trend needs to have a vote of no confidence called on them.

ok, that's totally bananas, let's keep the conspiranoia at check please, things with the tech scene are already bad enough
@javi I want to say that the TikTok ban is odd in a way that Meta can spy everyone however if it's a chinese doing the spying it's bad? Also, as brazilian who had to deal with elon musk's bullshit (attacking my country directly) recently, I am more pissed than anything, it feels like no platform respects my country except if it's USA.
I could say I just vented to you out of nowhere, I'm sorry.
Oh yeah, as someone who is not USian, seeing the US wanting to ban TikTok for giving a foreign gov access to their data is a fucking wild ride
@javi while usamerica allowed Elon Musk to attack our democracy because he didn't follow our countries laws, which was literally ban accounts from fascists that tried to fuck us up.

@WarmasterPalak @javi

Please link to these scientific studies.

@javi

> having to fend off the pressure from the CEO to make everything algorithmic timelines because, you know, tiktok makes a lot of money and why aren't we

🙏🙏🫡

@javi If you just make good products, you can be around forever. If you take a good product and cut corners for profit, you will see those profits, but only until it kills your company.

Many understand that but still do it. It’s about their legacy and their profit. They don’t care about the health of the company or the happiness of their consumers. They simply want to enter the record books for most profit and then resign. Next guy will be blamed for the fall of the company.

@javi

Yep, they have names. In 2020 the CEO of WordPress.com was Matt Mullenweg.

@javi Isn't that true for every comanpy, which is giving the focus to shareholder value instead of the product?

That is also why I like #mastodon or the idea of the fediverse at all.

@javi I work in corporate tech and I am desperately trying to find a way out. Reading your own experience and that within the article only emboldens my reasons why. I've gotten close to these levels of management who makes these decisions and seeing their profit driven motives so boldly has made me so disillusioned with it all.
@javi Thanks for writing this. I've had similar experiences at startups I worked at before. I'm pretty happy working in open source for a non-profit now, where for once now the focus is on creating an actually good user experience instead of extracting every last cent from the users.

@javi

Those are some jerks I'd really like to punch somewhere sensitive. Wreckers. Rotters. Vampires.

@javi because it use plain language in its description and conclusions? Because it equates consultant managers as parasites? That's why I like it.
I have grieved already (and living of my FuckYou stash helps a lot to think more independently)
@javi It is really sad how often this keeps happening. Looking at Spotify laying off 1,500 workers then being surprised that it hurt their ability to deliver a functioning product. They need UX and BAs to lead design and solutioning, not Finance and Sales.