@molly0xfff @vertana I wouldn't mind this as the default, and (what you ask) no motion for the preference as set.
TBH there's some far farrrr worse stuff out there that bothers me 20x as much. Anything that reflows while I'm reading it — because a banner reloaded at the top with different sizes — or pretty much anything that delays the moment I can begin reading, just to load data.
Those sorts of things are "does not work as designed" whereas the OP is pointing out things that are annoying when working as designed. Two separate fights.
@keyboardg I think you're talking about these:
https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/
http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/
https://perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.com/
(which I was beaten to :( )
Tho, I gotta admit, be cool if all corpos switched over to GeoCities and late 90s design.
@molly0xfff
"Minimalistic by design"
I don't think that word means what they think it means
That's what https://cooked.wiki/ is there for.
Yes, I know they probably need the adds to finance the free recipe site. But if they go that overboard - no
@molly0xfff molly i appreciate you
and *yes* https://follow.ethanmarcotte.com/@beep/110022616524644135
okay i love you all but by my math we’ve had a few years of animating in Every Single Block Of Content as the user scrolls down a web page, idk let’s maybe take a minute and look over the data
a year later and it's only gotten worse@jamiemccarthy oh no jamie
it meeeeeeee
@jeromechoo @beep @molly0xfff Back in the ‘90s, PowerPoint had an export to web function, which used a load of IE-only extensions to support all of the animations. As a result, IE could do any animation that PowerPoint could do.
I discovered this when ordering from a local pizza place at a friend’s house. He was the only person I knew still using IE and it turned out that what I’d thought was a fairly simple site (with a gratuitous number of background images) had weird transitions on every click. Looking at the page source, we found all of the non-standard CSS bits.
On the one hand, it’s nice that web standards have caught up with proprietary extensions. On the other hand, those extensions were an abomination unto Nuggan.

@molly0xfff God yes.
It was a constant, heavy thing of how much needs to load before the page is usable. And can we slim that down.
If you disable script stuff, most webpages now just completely brick. And they really don't fucking have to. If you want to do a simplistic aesthetic, do it! You can even be clever with click maps if you hate users that much, but stop with this animation that leaves me confused if my adblocker broke your shitty page, or 'stylized'.
@molly0xfff god yes
We took over the hosting for an organisation, and one of the “performance optimisations” I deployed for them was quartering the fade in time of their page.
@WildEyedBoyFromFreecloud @molly0xfff
What did you expect when the 'marquee' tag got deprecated in HTML5 ....
@molly0xfff Wow yeah I hate that.
Also sites that override scrolling to do some weird animation almost never should be doing so. (Which I guess is the same 'feature’ actually?)
@molly0xfff I love the animations.
Mostly because I can immediately see which companies prefer flashy bullshit over actual usability, and avoid their products/services.
@molly0xfff I blame Core Animation (Apple technology invented for iPhone OS). Fancy and easy-to-use APIs for giving every UI element frivolous slow behaviours, when all you want is to get on with it.
Edit: I mean, this explosion of animations was the inspiration for similar behaviours everywhere. Though it may have been destiny.
With the sheer irony that every major operating system out there and program is flat as a pancake.
Mac OS seems to have changed very little in the last 20 years...
Relative to its counterparts...
Shame IOS was / is a mess