@carnage4life I think that for many conservatives it's because they have a static idea of the "just right" amount of progressivism: that e.g. the civil-rights movement of the 1950s-60s was good, but at some point all the real problems were fixed and to go further is just going too far.
So it's OK for 1960s Star Trek to make episodes attacking racism, but for modern Star Trek to make episodes attacking transphobia is bad "woke".
I think that among conservatives this is a common feeling, and the point they identify as "just right" is invariably either in their own childhoods or a point just prior to their birth.
@ColmDonoghue @carnage4life Thinking differently is difficult because it involves critically examining your own past attitudes. And this is a bit exhausting for anyone.
But a really progressive outlook on justice and inclusion is that it's a neverending process--the work is never done and you can always get better.
@mattmcirvin @carnage4life The studies I've (casually) seen actually say the opposite: most people get more liberal as they age, but they don't keep pace with society as a whole.
They may seem more conservative in relation to everyone else, but they are more liberal compared to their younger self. It's just a popular thing to say.
Attached: 2 images I'm going to keep sharing this info until it sinks in. Young voters do not get significantly more or less politically activated. Voter suppression gets more or less effective. Ballot drop boxes and mail-in voting, prevents suppression. People do not become more conservative as they get older. There is not an increasing difference between white GOP and Dem voters as they get older. Black people don't live long, and many brown voters aren't born yet.
@jedbrown @ColmDonoghue @carnage4life Those graphs show that *partisan* vote over time is pretty static and essentially completely explained by changing racial demographics of the electorate.
But you'd probably get different results polling on individual *issues* (in fact I know this is true for some specific ones) since the positions of the parties themselves change over time.
(e.g. same-sex marriage was a position with little mainstream support in 1992, but supported by the Democratic Party by 2012 and nationwide law not long after.)
@LauraJG @carnage4life the craziest one for me is the youtube videos for the drumhead where they are acting as if picard is a huge conservative or something.
Like, what crazy pills are these people taking where star trek isnt a commie space utopia?
I swear these right wing nutters always use the drumhead quote when acting like star trek supports them.
It was this meme, but with the original Good Place dialogue, on Twitter, gotme into the show, around mid third season.
Fantastic tv. One of my all time faves.
And that finale, way to stick the landing. And endings are hard.

@carnage4life Hi ! Would it be possible to add an alt text so your toot is available to everyone ?
For instance :
Meme from The Good Place.
Eleanor asks "It's like, when did Star Wars become all political and anti-fascist ?"
Chidi answers "1977" while showing the chalkboard where it is written : "Bad guys = Imperials with fascist imagery (uniform, "stormtroopers"), old, white. Dissolution of elected senate. Good guys = woman-led, multispecies."
Thanks a lot !
"i cAAN't BelIEve sTaR TrEk IS all Woke Nao"
Yes. Now. This is certainly a new development. Never happened before. Ever. Nope. Never at all.
My favorite was when a bunch of guys a few years ago got really pissed off when they discovered that Rage Against the Machine was political.
Thinking about it, I'm not sure Star Wars was all that woke. As in, I'm not convinced it was interntionally done that way. I doubt too many of the people making it had much awareness of those aspects of what they were making in terms of concious political statement, and more "this is a cool story, the template has these tropes, and it keeps things simple".
It was perhaps less "woke" and more accedentally playing in that arena.
Yes, episodes 4-6 work well that way, but I found the narrative of episodes 1-3 disappointing… the basic plot is that our ‘good and beneficent’ elites got swapped for baddies… but rule by elites often leads to fascism because the takeover is easier to effect. Ask yourself where the ‘ordinary people’ are in that dynastic struggle, either the ones fighting it or the ones cosplaying it in proto-Strong Boys get-ups? It’s not an anti-elite message for sure.