AI has already been used to run scams, rip off artists, destroy search engines, and drown publishers under an avalanche of shit.

Now AI boosters found a new thing to enshittify: #UserResearch .

"AI research is better than nothing" is the latest in a long series of "bad research is better than nothing" arguments that miss the point of research in the first place.

#UXDesign #softwaredevelopment #ProductManagement

https://spavel.medium.com/no-ai-user-research-is-not-better-than-nothing-its-much-worse-5add678ab9e7

No, AI user research is not “better than nothing.” It’s much worse.

There is an invisible reader of every article, whose gaze counts for far more than 1 view, 1 read, or 1 “like.” That reader is, of course, the algorithm. Between search engines’ page-ranking…

Medium

@PavelASamsonov I guess that often research is "Something that we collectively believe in to be correct", a tool of alignment (not alignment in a particular direction).

Thus, the function is more belief and cohesion than exploration.

If (and only if!) believed in, any other, less exploitative and less engery hungry mechanism would do.

@simulo @Miniver calls this decision-driven evidence-making and he is absolutely right
@PavelASamsonov @Miniver
uh, interesting! Any write-up of this?
For me this was not even about a (already made) decision, just about any direction – a coin toss would work, too (if people believe coin tosses telling something they did not know before)
@simulo @Miniver I looked on his blog but couldn't find it, and my Twitter access has been broken for a while so I can't refer to the tweets since tweets are now logged-in only