@FantasticalEconomics @rauder @turtle_green so what you're saying is that it's better to change from lead ammunition in the machine gun to lead-free ammunition than to just stop shouting your friends, family and neighbourhood with it?

#Capitalism is what's doing the damage. Tinkering with isn't going to stop it doing the damage; destroying the planet is intrinsic to its operation. We need to stop using it.

@simon_brooke @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green

Simon, want to point out that it is something more basic that is destroying the planet than “capitalism.”

The Soviet Union, aka communists, were terrible for the environment. China has done & is doing terrible things to the environment.

They got rid of capitalism & still mess up the planet. So I think it makes sense to focus on solving other problems than getting distracted by simply attacking #capitalism & hoping everything will be green.

@rauder @simon_brooke @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green Correct!

It's perfectly possible for people to do massive environmental damage under just about any economic system. Greed is perfectly possible with capitalism...and communism, and socialism, etc. It's perfectly possible for people under ANY of these to do environmental damage for their own enrichment. Capitalism doesn't demand it, or "perpetual growth", any more than any others do, despite common (and loud) claims to the contrary.

@AlexanderKingsbury @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green greed isn't actually possible with #communism. It's possible under state socialism, which is the system which states governed by "#communist" parties have tended to adopt. But yes, you CAN wreck the environment under any economic system, that's true. However, #capitalism requires it, which is unusual.

@simon_brooke @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green

"greed isn't actually possible with #communism"

I'll have to add that to the collection.

"But yes, you CAN wreck the environment under any economic system, that's true. However, #capitalism requires it, which is unusual."

No, it's just false. Capitalism requires no such thing.

@AlexanderKingsbury @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green so how do you achieve eternal growth without wrecking the ecosystem?
@AlexanderKingsbury @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green also, while you're thinking about it, in a political system in which there is no personal property, what does "greed" mean?

@simon_brooke @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green The same thing it means with personal property. "a selfish and excessive desire for more of something (such as money) than is needed"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/greed

You can want way more of something than you need, even if neither you nor anyone else owns it.

Definition of GREED

Definition of 'greed' by Merriam-Webster

@AlexanderKingsbury @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green but if you can't have that (because everything is common property), what does it mean?
@simon_brooke @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green It means exactly the same thing. The claim that "everything is common property" is nonsensical, but even if it weren't, that doesn't preclude anyone from wanting way more than they need.
@AlexanderKingsbury @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green they may want it, but, you know, you can want the moon on a stick. You can't get it, so what does your wanting it mean?
@simon_brooke @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green It means greed can still exist under communism.
@AlexanderKingsbury @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green I think you're now so far into arguing semantics that I've no patience to follow you. Sure, if you say so. Enjoy your invisible pink unicorns.
@simon_brooke @rauder @FantasticalEconomics @turtle_green Enjoy imagining that any economic system can ever abolish greed.