At #37c3 they have IRC, and Matrix for text and for voice they setup their own LTE/2G/3G/SIP/DECT network where you bring whatever phone-like device and pick a 4 digit phone number.

Meanwhile in the USA for #defcon they just paid Discord money and told everyone to accept their privacy policy, and even the DC Privacy Village asks people to sign up for Slack and Google.

People ask why I fly to CCC from the USA. It is because that is the closest place to find a thriving hacker culture.

Related: if anyone in the central Silicon Valley that wants to start a corpo-free hackerspace where we favor learning and building over buying, hit me up.
@lrvick I’m wish coooperative membership maker spaces were a common occurrence. Shared studios. Expensive equipment none could afford on their own but could as a co-op, printers scanners laser cutters vinyl cutters 3-d printers wondering station, kilns, tools.

@lrvick

Now I have to figure out what autocorrect meant by ‘wondering station’ I think I meant Soldering stations. But woodworking equipment too.

@Chancerubbage @lrvick The CCC is a "Verein". That is like a non-government, non-profit organisation. We have members and members pay membership fees. There are local groups organised under an umbrella org. And we have membership meetings with democratic elections for board members and actions and distribution of money. Apart from that the Congress and Camp are organised by volunteers, people who have attended before and now have ideas about how to make it even better. It's a thriving community.

@levampyre @lrvick

The what? The who? What question is this answering? The BLT is on the PDQ? Ok.

@levampyre @lrvick

Oh maker space.

Apparently they make bylaws and initialisms.

@Chancerubbage @levampyre @lrvick Well, most hackerspaces want to have their own legal entity, for example to pay rent as that and not just have some person renting the place for everyone. Therefor they found a Verein, which has to have bylaws.
@jstsmthrgk Exactly, I'm not sure an equivalent legal concept exists in the US. A verein is a non-profit legal entity. It can sign contracts and do business as a legal entity. @Chancerubbage @lrvick
@levampyre @jstsmthrgk @Chancerubbage A 501c3 sounds closest.
@lrvick 🤷 I have to take your word for that. In any case, you wanna secure private individuals, so that they do not loose their livelihoods, when any part of the community project cooperative event management maker space whatever fails financially. @jstsmthrgk @Chancerubbage

@levampyre @lrvick @jstsmthrgk

It’s nice to know a bit more of the possible pitfalls. It’s obviously not easy and possibly problematic. The most common trad variant I’ve seen is Art Guilds. Usually just shared painting & drawing space, fee shared studio, perhaps shouldered by single proprietor giving lessons and get together.
I’ve seen some ceramics guilds supporting a Kiln try pure commercial.

Prob some hot rod garages have loose partnerships.

Better eqpt needs resources of more than one

@Chancerubbage I was explaining to @lrvick the community and structures that enable us to host the Congress and make it a great event even for visitors from abroad. It's organised and run by the community for the community.

@levampyre @lrvick

Yes, our tangents didn’t quite entangle. I don’t speak the alphabet soup jargon. Appreciated.

@Chancerubbage Ah, sorry, of course. CCC means Chaos Computer Club [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_Computer_Club]. It is a hacker association founded in Germany in 1981. And we host a yearly event - the Chaos Communication Congress [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_Communication_Congress] with talks, and workshops and tech tinkering and art and music and community building events. And, other than Defcon, it's not sponsored and entirely run by volunteers. (That's why it is so amazing!)
Chaos Computer Club - Wikipedia

@levampyre

Props bei den Antworten freundlich zu bleiben

@gabert Man tut, was man kann. 😉

@levampyre
sorry, Verein is not automagicly a nonprofit.
And CCC is not even charitable ("gemeinnützig"). And this for good reasons.

@Chancerubbage @lrvick

@mwfc Well, according to German association law, a registered association may not primarily pursue economic goals, but rather idealistic ones. This must also be stipulated in the articles of association. This has nothing to do with charitable status. A registered association can be charitable or not. The CCC has deliberately decided against applying for charitable status. It nevertheless remains a "non-profit" org, like any registered association. (However, this is mostly irrelevant in the US.)

@levampyre
I am sorry, can you point me to it?

Even wikipedia states the wirtschaftlicher Verein,.

You are contradicting a lot that I have learned the last 20 years.

Idealistic ones are optional and only necessary when you do non-profit aka charitable.
Wirtschaftliche Vereine, like GEMA

@mwfc I was talking about "eingetragene Vereine" as according to § 21 BGB [https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__21.html]. You cannot be a registered association of the legal form of an "e.V." when you pursue primarily for-profit interests. The CCC is a non-profit "e.V.", not a for profit Wirtschaftsverein. But again, this is absolutely irrelevant to the initial conversation. Please, don't be a German Besserwisser reply guy, who quotes and dissects § 2 VereinsG to me now. Because to what end!?
§ 21 BGB - Einzelnorm

@levampyre
Nope that is fine, I read it in parallel too. I had in my head that e.V. might as well be wirtschaftlich. But that is one up.
My mistake
@mwfc Yeah, no problem.
@levampyre
I actually fell into the rabbithole reading up why and how different states handle the wirtschaftliche vereine, which is crazy.
@mwfc Have fun! But honestly, I don't find value in any for-profit endeavours. So if you don't burn 'em to the ground or don't tax them properly (#TaxTheRich) I don't care for Wirtschaftsvereine. 🤷

@levampyre
I am quite happy with for profit stuff. Given that a lot of non-profit goes too much into self exploitation.
So having and ensuring a profitable system helps to stay sustainable.

But that means as well not dodging taxes and externalizing costs (like by self exploitation)

And yes, I am in the middle of founding a social business with others, and no minimum wage does not cut it, for none of the people involved. (some donate their time, as they are financially secure)

@mwfc If you feel exploited instead of rewarded from the volunteer work you do, stop it or take a break. Other than quitting a paid job you do not have financial risks from stopping voluntary work. But yeah, I agree, we should all have a universal basic income (and support each other). That way everyone could spend their time and effort on the things that reward them AND the community, instead of wasting our lives and our planet away for the profit of a minority of rich individuals.

@levampyre
You cannot assume that everything can run as a voluntary thing.
Some things do require full time people to work on. Certain requirements must have them working at business ours or SLA must be met. And some people certainly lack the skillset to have a high paying job that allows them to do it on the side, while they are a good fit for this kind of work.

So if you want to be sustainable you must be able to pay them a decent living wage for their work.

That is how reality works

@mwfc You are fully right, if you accept the capitalistic system we're currently living in as the unchangeable law of nature that it is. I don't. And you will not convince me on the last day of the year to stop dreaming and finally be realistic for once. No way!

@levampyre
I can pick my fights. Either change the system or do the social stuff with financial backing.

I consider the change the system to not be possible in the next few years, so I work on another part.

It is like doing cypherpunk and good crypto or do politics,.
I realized I am better in tech than politics, hence I work in that field.

Nothing wrong with trying to achieve your goals, but you must set priorities. So no offense if they are this or that way.

@mwfc Also I think there is still a difference between "for profit" endeavours and supporting the people financially who rip their legs off to organise an event or administer an association or run a server or whatever voluntarily for community purposes. Because yes, you/we should totally do that. 💯 But even if we do that, it doesn't make their effort or our support a "for profit" thing. Neither the CCC, nor the Orga team organises the congress to get rich off it. That's not the goal.

@levampyre
Yes I totally understand. But CCC is in the tech realm, which can be happy in the wage sector. This luxury is not universal.

My family is in the nursing/health area. There is a need that needs addressing, in social areas as well.
And you cannot expect everyone to be able to donate their time w/o compensation.
So you need to make sure your endeavor is funded and not run on sole self-exploitation.

That means yes, I need to able to hire folks if we do need to ensure SLA

@levampyre
and yes, I must ensure if things fuckup that I continue operation.
Aka that if noone volunteers their time and donates them, the SLAs can still be met for the foreseeable future until a decent deconstruction is possible.

And yes, that means having reserves, and having staff. And there is not one solution fits all.

And tbh if I take a look back at the pandemic, and how covid tracing worked and how much support we got from the community in the open source solutions, I get reaffirmed

@mwfc I'm with you. I just wouldn't necessarily call that "for profit". But the borders are soft there. If you start paying people, how do you make sure, that these people also feel ideolocically in line with and rewarded by the community goals and not just "do it for the money" (i.e. be exploited in their existential need to survive in a capitalist world.) You could say, I don't care. But I'm sure the Congress would be dull if it were run by people who do it just to survive capitalism.

@levampyre
The thing is, you must ensure that you can build up reserves. And this pretty much is a for profit logic.
There are plenty of tools to optimize this way, and to ensure that you make a profit.
If you do not optimize for max profit. The not for profit sector lacks those.

I consider congress a toy/fun/recreational event.
There is no harm done if it is not happening. While if you agree to take responsibilty for a kid, you cannot just "drop the ball" for a year. Or be unresponsive.

@levampyre
Hence I think the comparision of for profit social business vs a lot of highly paid folks come together and pay and have a party together in a rented location and which they do whatever they like quite unfair.

Not everything can be run this way.

@mwfc No, I think, it is a "for sustainability" logic. If you want to remain sustainable you need to plan ahead, sure. You cannot burn through your resources, if they are not renewable (which most resources aren't, including "human resources"). Now maybe, I'm too invested in the degrowth movement. But financial profit is not necessary to run whatever endeavour you're running sustainibly. And if you don't profit other than financially, why waste resources, why keep it running?
@mwfc @levampyre No problem there. A non-profit is allowed to hire people. But in an association, the members will have to agree to that in a membership meeting.
@levampyre @mwfc let us skip the legalese. As long as 'FC Bayern München' can be registered 'e.V.', calling them non-profit in nature is part of an academic discussion...

@Chancerubbage
I know of two Hacker/Makerspaces w/o corps that have SEMs. (One got theirs donated, the others bought an old one and made it run again, for <1500 Euro iirc)

I do agree tho, that there is need for multiple levels of stuff and spaces.

@lrvick

@Chancerubbage, @lrvick: I use my university's video-game development lab to its full advantage. I'd boot my portable SSD into a computer with an RTX 2070 and then connect a big Wacom tablet, in the same lab, to that computer. The result is a productive workstation which I can come back to anytime I come to UCI.

@VisualPlugin @lrvick

That’s mildly more virtual than I was even considering. I was thinking 3d printers and scanners, cnc machines, soldiering stations, laser vinyl and paper cutters. But a graphics card and a nice Wacom tablet can definitely count. I’ve taken computer classes just for access to printers and ‘color’ workstations, bringing in files on zip discs, or lower capacity floppies

@Chancerubbage: that'd be even better! Our Multimedia Resources Center has a 3D printer, but there are written instructions to bring an assistant before doing anything. If I'd need anything like that, I'll ask professors on campus if I can use their labs.

Professors seem to be reluctant to give you the lab unless you have a very good reason to use it, though.

@VisualPlugin I’m simply afraid such maker spaces, co-ops, clubs, could barely make enough to cover rent, even with dues, much less keep and maintain equipment to share that none could afford on their own, yet could be shared by many. Even with business models like services and lessons.

If any successfully thrive, I’d like to know about it. Community colleges can sometimes be good resources.

@lrvick I’ve always wanted to start a retrocomputing hackerspace. Is that a thing? It should be.

@lrvick: I live in Southern California, but I'd come to the Bay Area in early September. I have an idea for a libre carpool service which connects peers to manage their own payment without my intervention.

Let me know what we can work out!

@lrvick I've seen a talk where audience blamed speakers for using #github - #37c3
@Kurt @lrvick why? Because its MS?
Give Up GitHub - Software Freedom Conservancy

The Software Freedom Conservancy provides a non-profit home and services to Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects.

@lrvick @DO1HMN @Kurt I saw that domain and expected it to be a sourceforge loyalist site
@DO1HMN @Kurt @lrvick or goes back waaay before the acquisition through Microsoft. Basically the critique was and is, that GitHub is a closed non-libre platform.

@DO1HMN @Kurt @lrvick the one I have seen where this happened was about a large advertising network owned by Microsoft. The authors had a lot of criticism but put their code to analyse it on GitHub, which is owned by Microsoft.

Someone from the audience then criticized them for now contributing to the problem by hosting their code at GitHub and sending people to a Microsoft controlled platform.

https://media.ccc.de/v/37c3-11974-die_akte_xandr_ein_tiefer_blick_in_den_abgrund_der_datenindustrie

Die Akte Xandr

Dieses Jahr konnten wir erstmals im Detail nachvollziehen, wie invasiv und kleinteilig uns Werbefirmen und Datenhändler im Netz kategoris...

media.ccc.de

@Kurt Yes! How the fuck did we all collectively decide centralizing most source code sharing and collaboration on a Microsoft product was a good idea.

I never see anything but Github in the US, but at CCC self hosted git is everywhere. I love it.

@lrvick to be fair, when the decision was made, MS wasn't involved. However, now that they are involved, I have no plans to stay on that platform.
@lrvick I may mirror projects there just so people who find me there know the projects I work on, but I eventually want to move to a communal forge.
@ryan @lrvick it was a bad decision pre-MS as well.
@lrvick @Kurt It’s purely based on my own impressions, but I think that decentralisation is more a thing in EU than in US. For example, mastodon is based in Germany, not in US; same goes for a lot of internet projects (NLnog ring, ripe atlas, etc.)

@lrvick @Kurt

Oh, there are a ton of GitHub projects as well, and quite a few workshops where you absolutely MUST install Google Chrome because it's the only way to program a microcontroller known to mankind.