Future generations are going to look at this generation’s laxity with genetic data and privacy in the sane way we look back at smoking, Jim Crow laws and fossil fuels.

You can’t change your genetic data like you can a password and once it gets out it not only affects you both your relatives and your offspring.

You carry a gene for a chronic disease that’s inherited? Now insurance companies know that about you, your kids and grandkids.

Unbelievable privacy self own.

https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/10/private-23andme-user-data-is-up-for-sale-after-online-scraping-spree/

23andMe says private user data is up for sale after being scraped

Records reportedly belong to millions of users who opted in to a relative-search feature.

Ars Technica
@carnage4life to be fair, a sane society would have already forbidden discrimination on genetic basis for insurers, thus distributing the randomness across all of society; sadly, that's not the society we live in
@carnage4life so disheartening where adopted or abandoned children have no other choices to find family in many situations without these tools….

@carnage4life Privacy concerns are why I refuse to take a recreational genetic test. And unfortunately, my refusal is insufficient as the science has evolved that they can extrapolate from relatives who have taken the tests.

It’s a shame, since they are fascinating.

@carnage4life my dad did this for himself without checking with us 🥲
@carnage4life this is why I will never use one of these DNA services

@nathans @carnage4life

The sad thing about this, is that you don't need to. 🤷🏿‍♂️

If enough of your relatives do, you're in.

That's how they caught this dude.

Short version: a cop that is also a serial killer, can make sure that his DNA never enters the federal DNA database, so he can keep criming. But he can't stop his grandkids and cousins from entering private industry DNA databases, and he can't stop private industry from selling access to the Feds.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_James_DeAngelo

Joseph James DeAngelo - Wikipedia

@mekkaokereke @carnage4life yeah you're right. I'm probably already screwed because my sister did one of these

@nathans @carnage4life

Double fun:

There might be a gene sequence that only appears in nature in exactly one individual: you!

Your sister might have a similar sequence. Your parents might have a similar sequence. But this specific sequence only appears in you.

Your mom and dad night have partial immunity from a condition. Your sister might have almost full immunity. You are the only human on earth with full immunity.

The DNA bank can get a gene patent on your sequence. 🤡

Thanks sis!

@nathans @mekkaokereke @carnage4life At least none of my family members have done this and nobody will. We all have a healthy distrust of these services.
@nathans @carnage4life The threat isn’t you - it’s anyone closely related to you. My mom did this and didn’t tell me first - and now it’s too late. Your parents, kids, siblings are all threats. Even cousins to a degree. I guarantee at least one of them doesn’t understand the risks or doesn’t care.
@carnage4life And even more, that company (and a lof of the competitors) outsourced the gene sequencing to China. It's relatively certain that Chinese government has copy of the genetic database, since their laws require companies to turn in any data (without any legal process) when asked by the officials.
@carnage4life Been screaming into the void about this for so many years. And we undoubtedly haven't even conceived yet of how this data will be used against us or our descendants, just because someone thought it would be fun to get a crappy report that they were 30 percent Italian or whatever. How stupid.
@carnage4life Precisely. We need a privacy bill of rights desperately. Covering all PHI, and NO HIPAA is not enough since everyone just makes you waive your HIPAA rights.
@carnage4life Knowledge that you have a gene for a chronic disease is only a positive in most developed countries. It helps doctors make sure to give you the treatment that you need. It is only a risk to you in a place with an insane insurance system, that is, in the US. The cure isn't to keep genetic information private (though there are other reasons for that). The cure is universal health care, where your genetic history only helps your doctor find the appropriate treatment for you but otherwise has no cost to you.
@carnage4life sad to see that the idea of Americans have given up the fight for a sane public healthcare policy so the assumption is their grandkids will suffer from this.
@carnage4life Healthy insurance is immoral and unethical imho.
@carnage4life This might be why “3 parent babies” are now a reality (an attempt to genetically edit out chronic illnesses).

👉🏾 https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.21761

I wonder if future insurance companies will require this procedure for “coverage‽”
Genetic details of controversial 'three-parent baby' revealed - Nature

But the child's parents have decided to forego long-term monitoring by researchers.

Nature
@carnage4life Surprise!1! And Hello GATTACA
@carnage4life 23andMe should be made to bankrupt itself in reparation payments. The whole affair makes me glad I never used #23andMe or #Ancestry and now I never will. Corporations cannot be trusted to protect our data.

@carnage4life It’s not like no one saw this coming. We were warned for years that this could happen.

Probably coincidental, but disturbing that this would come out12 hours before the biggest attack on Israel in 50 years.

(The Ashkenazim are 35% of the population of Israel, and 75% of the world’s Jewish population.)

@carnage4life health insurance companies already have the right to access patients medical records. As a payer they are a covered entity and don’t require written permission.
@carnage4life
That's assuming that it's a rule of the universe that humanity will always make progress with the passage of time.
I'd posit that future generations will enjoy less human rights than we do, not more. That this, the last few decades, is where we peak.
@carnage4life One of my specialists informed me about the risks involved with genetic testing - one of them being insurance companies being aware of a gene I may be carrying and a possibility of being denied future coverage. That was enough for me to say no. It’s already a battle with insurance companies! Why add on?

@carnage4life TBH, the right thing to do here is almost certainly to ban insurance companies, by law, from adjusting rates based on genetic condition.

Not that we shouldn't also protect privacy. But we've bent medical infosec around in ways counter to providing quality healthcare already (before ubiquitous cheap genetic testing) to avoid that outcome. Law can regulate markets; why not just ban the practice?

@carnage4life that's terrible, that's why the public healthcare system has to be protected or created in the case of US.
@carnage4life I tried to tell people this but they pooh-poo'd my concerns
@carnage4life and even worse that you can be exposed involuntarily by relatives.

@carnage4life People are focusing on the bad that insurance companies can do with such information...

...but what if there were no insurance companies? What if (crazy idea) healthcare wasn't a profit-driven industry but instead something provided as a common good regardless of how good or bad your genes were?

This data has value only because of America's crazy and dystopic health insurance system.

@carnage4life I made this mistake years ago without realizing. Is there a way to take it down?
@carnage4life It - the company - wrote to users and advised them to adopt their 2-step id program that requires users to use qr codes and/or face id or touch id. Other firms in the past have figured out who was effected e-mialed those effected and then closed effected accounts and required new passwords. This company has put security on the user who paid to buy their services. I am not happy with them.

@carnage4life

That’s only such an issue in the topsy-turvy USA world, where health and basic security must be bought. More likely future generations will look back (as we do looking on) with incredulity that only the wealthy could be well, that people would go to early graves with curable diseases because they couldn’t afford treatment, couldn’t change jobs without losing access to life-sustaining care, had to choose between food and insulin, and that seniors lived in abject poverty.

@carnage4life REALLY great analogy!

The problem is that a lot of people then make the leap that choosing to give your data to services like 23 And Me is inherently Wrong and Bad, when IMO at least it's a personal decision and just fine *so long as you're aware of the risks* like, oh, for instance, that your DNA data may well be flowing freely right now through innumerable dark markets :)

I say this because last year I was re-united with my biological father and half sister because we both signed up for 23 And Me. I am DEEPLY grateful to have them both in my life, and if I'd never signed up, I would never have the opportunity to know them!

Big risks, and sometimes, big rewards :) It's all a personal choice and CRAZY complicated.