Never in my life would I expected a cybersecurity issue (at least not a non-food safety issue) to result in a food recall
Add this to your risk assessments
Never in my life would I expected a cybersecurity issue (at least not a non-food safety issue) to result in a food recall
Add this to your risk assessments
Thanks for adding an image description!
> "explicit content unsuitable for children"
i assume they're referring to the copaganda that's plainly indicated on the box
What does "compromised" mean here? Did someone hack the CMS or have they simply forgotten to extend the printed domain and someone else grabbed it and placed stuff there?
@wifi_freak @JamesWidman @PlainSimpleAlex Seems to be more similar to the latter: the company went out of business, and so the domain name was not extended, and someone else grabbed it.
@foundthefault @PlainSimpleAlex It appears to have been a website for the distributor which was lapsed in late 2022 and has been picked up by a porn site perhaps from China?
(On review: a whole lot of difficult-to-explain-to-small-children thumbnail vids with affilliiate links to other porn sites, I think. Yeah this is kind of work for me because I can file it under "things to warn my clients about")
@voltagex @PlainSimpleAlex which makes me think it's a typo in the domain in this case
A compromised server they could just shut down. If they can't, then the packaging is pointing to someone else's server
@directhex @voltagex @PlainSimpleAlex lapsed rego I suspect, as of a couple of years back (on archive.org) it looked like a legit site for a distributor of paw patrol branded snacks under .com but they have a new .co.uk domain now and perhaps just abandoned the old one?
I normally wouldn't post porn URLs but for science: appy kids co dot com ... you can just make it out if you search for high resolution images of the box pictured in the recall.
Yeah, this is the kind of thing I have to warn clients about. A domain is for life, not just for Christmas 😉
@ajft @ospalh https://web.archive.org/web/20211128200225if_/https://www.appykidsco.com
Currently, http://www.appykidsco.com loads https://weekendhei.com when viewed on mobile or https://batit.aliyun.com otherwise. The domain lapsed after the company was dissolved in 2022: https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualUK/comments/165l0n8/comment/jyeichf
@luvcraft https://web.archive.org/web/20211128200225if_/https://www.appykidsco.com
Currently, http://www.appykidsco.com loads https://weekendhei.com when viewed on mobile or https://batit.aliyun.com otherwise. The domain lapsed after the company was dissolved in 2022: https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualUK/comments/165l0n8/comment/jyeichf
@PlainSimpleAlex omg its real
Urgent recall: Paw Patrol snacks from Lidl
Website URL published on packaging has been compromised and contains explicit content unsuitable for children.
Refrain from viewing the website and return the product to the nearest Lidl store for a full refund.
Flavours and photos of packaging.
There is also a mysterious small heading at the top that says "Which?" Edit: turns out this is the name of a UK consumer advice magazine.
@PlainSimpleAlex please feel free to use my image description above!
Note: I couldn't fit the full list of flavours into 500 characters but maybe they're not essential.
@eddie https://web.archive.org/web/20211128200225if_/https://www.appykidsco.com
Currently, http://www.appykidsco.com loads https://weekendhei.com when viewed on mobile or https://batit.aliyun.com otherwise. The domain lapsed after the company was dissolved in 2022: https://www.reddit.com/r/CasualUK/comments/165l0n8/comment/jyeichf
@PlainSimpleAlex Oh boy! Digging into this a little further, the recall calls it a "compromised" website, but TechCrunch notes the company that made the treat went out of business in 2022 (https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/01/lidl-recalls-paw-patrol-snacks-after-website-on-packaging-displayed-porn/).
So, the company made the product (in early 2022?) put their current URL on it, but then went out of business and let their domain lapse. Someone re-bought the URL and is hosting explicit content on it? That's not really a security failure, but is an interesting edge case!
OK, who thought this was just a satirical internet post?