Every #NYT story lately.
I have no idea where this image originated and take no credit.
Every #NYT story lately.
I have no idea where this image originated and take no credit.
Bari Weiss. Christ, what a fucking cunt.
I see the #RealOwners are saying the quiet part out loud again.
Right...?
For example:
Musk: I'm gonna piss on all the blue check marks.
NYT headlines the next day:
"Why Urine is Good For You"
"How I was the First to Be in Line"
"Clothing for being Urinated On: Is plastic cool?"
"Kanye: Elon pissed on me too!"
@BalooUriza The biggest myth is the belief that if rich people didn't have so much money you or others would be better off.
There is no sure thing as a finite amount of money, for example a rich person doesn't take 90% leaving leaving everybody to share 10% because at any moment any person can earn or make enough money to become rich themselves.
50 years ago only the rich became richer, not today.
@BalooUriza you had me until "lately"
they've been a right-wing rag clinging to the veneer of respectability since its inception
"All the News That's Fit To Print for Rich Assholes."
@BalooUriza
> Every NYT story lately [simping for the billionaire class needing to be richer]
I appreciated people like Nick Hanauer who break this pattern:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/21/opinion/overtime-pay-a-lifeline-for-the-overworked-american.html
I wish I had more time to listen to the podcast where he interviews heterodox economists about why the wealthy need to pay more tax, minimum wages need to be higher, etc:
http://www.pitchforkeconomics.com
"There are no examples in the known universe in which force didn’t equal mass times acceleration. But the same cannot be said for the “theory” that if wages go up, employment will go down. It’s not always true. It’s not even that it’s almost always true—it isn’t even usually true."
#NickHanauer, 2015
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/economic-theory-science-scam
In this column, venture capitalist Nick Hanauer critizes the theory that a higher minimum wage will cause increased unemployment. Going further, he suggests that economic theories in general are not science, but merely social and moral constructs.
"Thus, the claim that when wages go up for low-wage workers, employment will go down isn’t really a legitimate “theory.” Rather, it’s best understood as a claim designed to influence how people explain the world around them, and by doing so, control people’s behavior. I think of this so-called theory as more of a scam or a confidence game."
#NickHanauer, 2015
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/economic-theory-science-scam
In this column, venture capitalist Nick Hanauer critizes the theory that a higher minimum wage will cause increased unemployment. Going further, he suggests that economic theories in general are not science, but merely social and moral constructs.
"The real magic of trickle-down economics, by the way, isn’t to convince people that if the rich get richer, that’s good for the economy and therefore good for you. The real power comes from convincing people that if the poor get richer, that will be bad for the economy and bad for you.
This is why economics is often less science and more scam."
#NickHanauer, 2015
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/economic-theory-science-scam
In this column, venture capitalist Nick Hanauer critizes the theory that a higher minimum wage will cause increased unemployment. Going further, he suggests that economic theories in general are not science, but merely social and moral constructs.
"I’m not asserting that everyone who subscribes to this “theory” secretly knows it isn’t true but says it anyway. On the contrary, the people who say it usually believe it... if you are a person who pays wages or are sympathetic to those who do so, the theory that if wages go up, employment comes down is a very attractive thing to believe and to promulgate. After all, if I run a business, your wages are my profits."
#NickHanauer, 2015
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/economic-theory-science-scam
In this column, venture capitalist Nick Hanauer critizes the theory that a higher minimum wage will cause increased unemployment. Going further, he suggests that economic theories in general are not science, but merely social and moral constructs.
How would Marxist class theory explain a Nick Hanauer?
Is it a limited hangout? Promulgating social democratic ideas to keep people from discovering revolutionary forms of socialism?
Is it an example of a less powerful faction of the ruling class, angling to increase their power during the next big upheaval that takes down the dominant factions?
Or is he just a rare example of a smart person who can't help calling bullshit when were sees it, regardless of his class interests?
@BalooUriza The people who push the kinds of thoughts in this post are one or more of:
@BalooUriza
Eat the rich.
Figuratively, not literally, but #MulchTheRich doesn't have the same ring to it.