I adore this comic by @elisegravel.
โSo, yeah, YOU can be a scientist, too!โ #science #art #education
I adore this comic by @elisegravel.
โSo, yeah, YOU can be a scientist, too!โ #science #art #education
Attached: 1 image New posting! It was an honour and an absolute pleasure talking with Bruno Lemaitre about the impact of #narcissism on #science. Bruno discovered the role of the #Toll pathway in the #Drosophila immune response to fungal infections, but the #Nobel prize went to his postdoc boss, Jules Hoffmann. Besides the interview, there's also a link for the FREE download of his book on the topic. ๐ https://totalinternalreflectionblog.com/2023/08/17/science-and-narcissism-an-interview-with-bruno-lemaitre/
@kikebenlloch @Sheril @elisegravel
Yeah, not to poop on what is a delightful cartoon, that might be the perfect thing for a kid to read to encourage them, but being willing to say "I don't know" and "I was wrong" seem even more science-y than having curiousity.
Although the most science-y thing might be to say "I don't know.", and then there's that gleam in the eye as they add "Yet".
I wholeheartedly agree that this is how science *should* work.
My experience is that it's a lot messier. There are people who believe they know the answer to everything in advance, who never admit to changing their view or having wrong intuitions. There are people who defend mistakes or quietly correct them, then claim recognition for having been right, and people doing amazing things and not being recognized...
...as in all other lines of work.
... but to be a scientist, you have to be WILLING to be wrong, ask for help, admit you don't know everything and that you aren't a genius. You also have to be willing to do the hard work of continuing through til the research is done, not just til you're satisfied or tired of it or got an answer you liked. Not everyone has those qualities or is willing to learn them. Not everyone is, or can be, a scientist.
@Sheril @elisegravel
I love this, but it's a little ableist in an unusual way. "Some scientists are geniuses, but most scientists are people like you and me."
I know the intent isn't contrasting "scientists" and "people," but contrasting it with "people like us." It's just one of those situations where English can be imprecise.
(On the other hand, if someone's brain is sticking out of his forehead, maybe he's an alien!)
@Sheril @elisegravel What makes a scientist a scientist, is the usage of the scientific method.
Just being curious is of course important, but not enough to be scientific. Structuring chaos, isolating effects and identify causality, not just correlations is essential.
@Sheril @elisegravel yup. this is awesome. i was a scientist for more than 20 years, co-author on over 30 publications, published in places like Nat Comms and Cell. three first authorships, Participated on a submission in which a childhood disorder was named for the first time.
and was never able to get into grad school bc my baccalaureate grades were not good enough. (it's not only when we were 'young' ;)
thank you - forwarded this to my kids
@Sheril @elisegravel
Itโs actually a fascinating intersection between cultural representations of โscientistsโ, โgeniusesโ, social expectations and awareness vs self doubt in the context of fathoming oneself in either of the first two categories. No matter who the person is, science is always the first route if youโve at all got enough awareness to value the growth of awareness in the first place. Unless someone is misrepresenting science, every other choice equals less self-awareness. ๐โค๏ธ๐ฆนโโ๏ธ