"History will judge them harshly."

Do you really think that matters to them? They'll be long gone when History--which can't judge anything, it can only be recorded and people learn/remember what took place--"judges" them.

And it'll be too late by then anyway. And they don't care. At all.

Can we maybe choose a different phrase? Like, say, "These vile fascists are total assholes who are destroying democracy and need to be stopped STAT"? How's that?

You're welcome. #ImPissed THREAD🪡 1/…

2/ IOW, History isn't a person. It doesn't "judge." People do, based on what took place and was recorded.

I find phrases like this to be a lazy way of calling out the bad guys. Just call out the bad guys, FFS.

And btw, again, the bad guys don't care one bit how "History" will "judge" them, esp. because "History" can't judge anything.

Sorry, rambling. I'm in a mood.

3/ Your replies have been great. But I apparently wasn’t clear.

My gripes: The trite phrase “History will judge”: meaningless, lazy default (sort of like my other pet peeve, “Are you surprised?”). I was sharing my annoyance at attributing human qualities to a written record as if it were able to “judge.”

WE should judge NOW, then VOTE.

Other gripe: those written up by historians will be dead/buried and don’t care what will be documented.

I was NOT addressing fascism or how to deal with it.

4/ I was not addressing WHO will write history. I was ONLY addressing 1) my exasperation with the overused expression, the idiom “history will judge”, and 2) that those who want to kill democracy don’t care about being judged now, and certainly won’t care once they’re dead.

Those were my points.

Nothing broader than that. Really just a simple gut reaction to overused language.

Based on replies, I wasn’t clear enough. My bad.

@GottaLaff
Not going to bother reading what any particular person took issue with in your OP.
But I do want to express appreciation for your consideration in being accessible to readers.
Don't see that quality in many larger accounts. I understand it must be tedious and quite possibly stressful.
So again, thanks for what you do.
You and your connections are valuable in presenting perspectives worthy of consideration.

@Dgun8 Some took issue, others misunderstood my point, I think, even though their points were good ones.

And so many thanks. I try to reply, I miss so many or I get too swamped sometimes, but I try.

@GottaLaff This is an astute insight. Too often, 'history will judge' is deployed as a thought-terminating clichĂŠ- that is, to end the line of questioning that might uncomfortably lead to actually doing anything about it now.

Thank you for raising it
well done
no notes
@LuciferMorningstar Omg, so many thanks for that!!!
@LuciferMorningstar @GottaLaff Very similar in purpose to "thoughts and prayers”.
@GottaLaff That and if they win they will at least try to write the history so there is that *shrugs*

@GottaLaff

Exactly. That is not to say issues/crimes shouldn't be recorded for posterity, but the issue should be adjudicated and the responsonsible perpetrators penalized immediately. Assigning recognition/punishment to history is how we got here to begin with.

@Atticus1956 Oh, I wasn't suggesting that we shouldn't document, which I thought was clear, I hope? I was saying that history IS documentation, not human with an ability to judge.

And yes to the rest.

@GottaLaff Oh, it was clear. Just attempting to add my 2 cents of support.

@GottaLaff

Another point: history is written by the victors, so if Trump and his ilk carry the day, history will sing their praises — or else.

@Leisureguy But that's part of my point. I said "4/ I was not addressing WHO will write history. I was ONLY addressing..."
@GottaLaff I had not read that when I responded. I wrote my reply to 3/ without having seen 4/. My apologies. I was reading your posts as they arrived. I should have clicked to read the entire thread before writing my response. I understand now (and in fact understood as soon as I read 4/ — at that point I should have deleted my post).

@Leisureguy Oh, no biggie, I was just letting you know.

I always appreciate your feedback.

@GottaLaff it's essentially kicking the can down the road.

"In 100 years time I'll be proven right and they'll be proven wrong"

Doesn't really help right now though does it genius?

@GottaLaff History may be able to judge, but it can't sentence.

@ridetheory History cannot judge. That's my point. That's why I wrote the thread. Please reread it.

But I agree, it also can't sentence.

@GottaLaff

It's a panacea. Truly lazy and equally dismissive of the present reality.

@GottaLaff Attila the Hun is considered a good guy in Hungary. This was true even before Viktor OrbĂĄn came to power.
@MolnarSteven Not my point, but okay
@GottaLaff Yes, your point is good: they don't care, and History itself does not judge. But my point is that even those who read history can come to radically different interpretations, so the concept of being judged by history is doubly absurd.
@MolnarSteven Oh your point was great. Just not where I was headed.
@GottaLaff history is written by and In favor oft socalled winners.
@karlotina Yes. My point is my pet peeve about the phrase, its being meaningless, and how nobody being judged (history cannot judge, it's not human) cares.
@GottaLaff god is a concept is As is. A concept. It is fair. The wheel yet comes full circle once again. No escapees trust me there. Azrael takes all and it is back in da box gor king and pawn alike. Let be. Yoko Ono and John Lennon knew. Ooorlog is forbij.
@GottaLaff god never liked anything human in his Garden, just sayin.

@GottaLaff

People make judgments based on the history they are taught.

If history is not taught truthfully, then the value and knowledge of history is almost lost.

@GottaLaff Since history is written by the winners it'll only judge them harshly if they lose. We need to ensure that history *can* judge them harshly, now.

@AntonPNym History can't judge anything. It's not a person.

People judge. I find that phrase to be a lazy way to call out the bad guys.

@GottaLaff Sociopaths have no vision, no sense of history at all. They live only for themselves and present glory and status. So, you're right, they don't care. Not one bit.

@flyhigh Thanks. And History isn't a person, it cannot judge. People judge based on history.

I see that phrase as a lazy way to call out the bad guys. It's a pet peeve of mine.

@GottaLaff @flyhigh

To me it reads as "They're evil, but I'm impotent to do anything about it."

Which makes me wonder "Why the hell am I wasting time listening to you? Please point me to the people who are doing something.".

@flyhigh @GottaLaff

Ask Trump's flunky, Bill Barr, who in an interview asserted he did not care about future history (IIRC).

@GottaLaff
100% right.

These authoritarians want complete control and expect to write the textbooks. They are *not* concerned about history.

@TCatInReality Thanks! Plus, "History" doesn't "judge" anything. History is not a person.

People use that phrase lazily and it drives me nuts. If you want to say that people will be seen as the schmucks they are, say it. Don't lay it on inanimate "History."

@GottaLaff
I agree.

Just like they're not afraid of "the law" because they expect to write the laws.

The public needs to understand that " history" and "law" are not immutable, neutral facts. They are an exercise in power - and we must take greater care with who we invest with that power.

@TCatInReality @GottaLaff

Relevant:
[email protected]
[email protected]
OccuWorld @OccuWorld

Anti-Intellectualism Is Killing America

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/our-humanity-naturally/201506/anti-intellectualism-is-killing-america

Social dysfunction can be traced to the abandonment of reason.

Key Points
* Ignorance, or an aversion to reason, has allowed things like gun violence and racism to define American culture.
* Anti-intellectual societies fall prey to tribalism and simplistic explanations, are emotionally immature, and often seek violent solutions.
* Corporate interests encourage anti-intellectualism, conditioning Americans into conformity and passive acceptance of institutional dominance.

#chatteleconomy #socialmanipulation #classwar #psychologicalwarfare #indirectplutocracy #publicassault #exploitation #theft #control #corporatism #dystopia

@WBOrcutt @TCatInReality @GottaLaff @OccuWorld

To summarize: Given that our government and cultures are controlled by a) capitalists and b) religious leaders...it's pretty much a given that ignorance and emotion are the driving forces in our society.

@Frances_Larina @WBOrcutt @GottaLaff @OccuWorld
Capitalists and religions have pretty much always run society. The question is what allowed science to have so much influence in the past 250 years?

@TCatInReality @Frances_Larina @GottaLaff @OccuWorld

IMHO "Don’t let plutocrats destroy life on Earth" https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/23/dont-let-plutocrats-destroy-life-on-earth

&

"Don’t Choose Extinction" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DOcQRl9ASc

When it comes to the #ClimateEmergency - It is not hopeless & we, the people are not helpless! If we take individual action now - without asking anyone! https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jul/28/climate-crisis-emergency-rebecca-solnit-terry-tempest-williams

WE,THE PEOPLE, to save planet Earth, must become #EcoConciousConsumers https://www.thinkhousehq.com/features/climate-conscious-consumerism-what-is-it-and-how-do-we-do-it who actively mitigate global warming by our daily choices of: who we donate to, vote for, invest/divest/bank in; what we buy, eat, drive/pedal; to switch from gas to electric; to reduce, reuse, recycle; & consume less. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2018/12/27/35-ways-reduce-carbon-footprint/

Don’t let plutocrats destroy life on Earth

Letters: Readers reflect on ways to spark action to tackle climate collapse in the face of the rich dictating the conversation and policies

The Guardian

@TCatInReality @WBOrcutt @GottaLaff @OccuWorld

My guess: Science was a tool used to increase profits so of course Capitalists embraced it. My fear is that at some point soon if capitalism falls, religion will once again have its time of power.

@Frances_Larina @TCatInReality @GottaLaff @OccuWorld

True. The challenge for
for the future of democracy & humanity in this time of climate emergency and rising Fascism is somehow to educate & enlighten people that they have been deceived.

IMHO that means that we cannot depend on politicians or industry. Politicians continued employment depends on votes and money. Industry's continued greed depends on Capitalism and the influence of those politicians and deception of the public.

Therefore, the only solution I see is for us to inform the public directly of the truths regarding governance
and Global Warming by posting on social media directly to individuals.

With regard to the climate crisis, I believe that we should always use the term "Global Warming" & the fact that it is caused by greenhouse gasses (GHGs).

Every mitigation effort should be measured by it's reduction of GHGs.

@WBOrcutt @TCatInReality @GottaLaff @OccuWorld

"the only solution I see is for us to inform the public directly of the truths regarding governance
and Global Warming by posting on social media directly to individuals."

The problem I see with this is that people who don't already accept it are refusing to accept it. Not accepting it makes them feel powerful, and that is encouraged by the media and leaders they follow.

@GottaLaff I like your new phrase. There are some sayings that honestly make no sense - like “anything that doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”
@rabbijill Omg yes. Thank you. You totally get it.
@GottaLaff Hate that phrase!
I remember when Bush ll said he wasn't concerned about his legacy because he wouldn't be around to see "the final verdict". He added "In other words, I'll be dead."
This is how republicans think. History doesn't matter.