@timamor
1. Expository Bible teaching. Non-negotiable. Teach what God says in the text. If it ain't expository, it ain't preaching.
2. Understands the complexity of sin and evil. Understands that people suffer because of sins they didn't commit and doesn't treat that suffering as something to repent of. Call it "trauma-informed".
3. Spiritual friendship. Members care for each other practically *and* have gospel-flavored conversations freely.
@timamor I thought of a fourth one that might actually be a tie for third.
Poor people can be full members. Discipleship isn't paywalled. No studies they're excluded from because they can't afford the book, and no afterthought announcements ("if you can't afford the book, come see us"). Doesn't rely on expensive outside events for spiritual growth.
(Abuse prevention and response is the zeroth item on my list, for the record. I'm not shopping for it; I'm just demanding it.)
@jfslicer @timamor @JulieB I don't think the size of the congregation matters as much as the power distance. There are small groups and house churches that are little cults and bigger gatherings that are healthy.
I think it is helpful to have a particular group of people who are your "cell", the first friends you call, the people you're closest to. But as a single adult, I've experienced both care and exclusion under that model.
Basically, I'm size agnostic.
@jfslicer @cleopas @timamor @JulieB @StoneKamino I like this approach better than "tell me if you can't pay". I will say, though, that "suggested donation" language is still rough on me when I can't afford it; I still fear being quietly judged, or like I have to double check that it's really okay, and sometimes that's too much to face, so I just sit it out.
I'd feel better about something like "Please sign up if you're interested so we know how many copies/tickets we need to get. If you'd like to help us cover the costs, see Jane." That makes it clearer that there's not an expectation of payment.
@jfslicer @JulieB @timamor @StoneKamino @cleopas Right, it's less about what's in *your* head than what's going on in the *hearer's* head. People can carry a lot of shame that you didn't put there. Part of carrying one another's burdens, I think.
Similarly, a Chinese student and convert told me that one barrier to Chinese people accepting an invitation to attend church is that they think they have to pay to attend. He explains to people right up front that the offering plate is for members who choose to give, not an admission fee. My home church tradition explains that every week, too, to take that burden off. It's not that anyone *told* them that putting money in the plate was expected (like the "suggested donation" box at the entrance to Publix museums). It's just that people bring preconceptions and prior experiences with them to church.