bluesky is fun, threads is fun, but I don't think I'll ever forget the lesson of Twitter:
if you don't control your own social graph, someone else controls an increasingly important part of your life
bluesky is fun, threads is fun, but I don't think I'll ever forget the lesson of Twitter:
if you don't control your own social graph, someone else controls an increasingly important part of your life
@mimsical ooo, very concise way to describe this!
Thank you!
I'd try #BlueSky if #Mastodon failed to do what I need it to at some point, but I explicitly want a news feed with reporters and journalism and #Threads seems quite hostile to that.
Also I've heard that Threads doesn't let you follow only the posts of the people you follow, but populates them with random "algorithm" suggestions.
I think I'd rather die. Facebook and Twitter both did a version of that and if it was forced, I would have left. Renders the timeline worthless.
@Albertkinng I'm not @mimsical but I'll try:
Simply put, your social graph is the people you interact with. Twitter, BlueSky, FB and all corporate social media algos show you what THEY think will keep you engaged. This causes you to interact more with some and less with others, which changes your social graph.
Mastodon simply shows things in a chronological view. Your social graph is influenced purely by who you follow.
More here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_graph
@shrikant @Albertkinng @mimsical @Gargron
Ergo, if a Mastodon server suspends our account, we have legal right to our Following & Followers provided that data was not 'accidentally' deleted?
@postpunky Erm, not sure about that honestly but perhaps someone with a better understanding of the subject will chime in with an answer hopefully... 🤞
@shrikant @Albertkinng @mimsical @Gargron
It does pose a consistency conundrum.
@hosford42 @mimsical I think you can guess how many people in the world are willing to do that based on how many Mastodon instances there are: ~11K out of 5B internet users https://mastodon.help/instances
Sounds great: but nobody (statistically speaking) wants to self-host a social network instance. Especially when easier to use centralized alternatives exist.
Threads reaching 20X Mastodon's size in no time is proof thereof
@hosford42 @mimsical Ideology doesn't draw users. Content & other people do.
This sounds a lot like the desktop Linux hype of the 2000s. Linux eventually "won" via being the most commonly deployed kernel (i.e. phones, routers, etc.) as opposed to dominating the desktop.
I see the same happening with ActivityPub. Mastodon won't win social, but AP may underpin a vast array of future services
@jdrch @mimsical Ideology does draw users, just not on the same level as content.
I'm in agreement with you about AP vs Mastodon. Mastodon is one piece of software in a whole ecosystem that is cropping up. I'll be here on the free, bottom-up social graph from here on out. I'm sure not everyone will fall inline with that, but I won't be alone. And I expect the number to grow. Unlike Linux, the fediverse adds to that grassroots appeal with the ability to connect to other people and share ideas.
If both coexist, and the corporate networks are federated, then that by definition is the fediverse winning. Corporations aren't going to go away. But if they have to play our game instead of vice versa, that's enough for me.
@hosford42 @mimsical Threads currently has no ads.
"Social" to non-ideologues means "where my friends are." It's why people have FB despite its numerous issues.
I don't think either centralized or decentralized models are going away; both will coexist.
@frumble @mimsical Which is generally looked at as a pro in my mind. Mastodon and AP in general lacks greatly in the discovery aspect.
Unfortunately for good interoperability in any good platform, there has to be some inherent centralization somewhere. If you look at DNS, the address-book of the internet, you're free to choose where to host your domain and nameservers wherever you choose. There still has to be a central directory to know where everything is.
@bonz @mimsical Here are some interesting links discussing #Bluesky’s decentralization (ignore the German): https://chaos.social/@frumble/110400615874517528
@[email protected] Ich möchte hier zum Thema #Bluesky reingrätschen: Die sind nur vorgeblich dezentral. Das PR-Narrativ immer zu wiederholen, ist problematisch. Hier schildert ein Entwickler die absurden Voraussetzungen fürs Protokoll in eigenen Servern: https://urbanists.social/@sam/110339902538138997 Hier wettert das Dorsey-Lager um Nostr ganz ähnlich: https://fiatjaf.com/ab1127fb.html
@mimsical This is why I wish there was a way to make Mastodon and other Federation apps more fun.
Part of that is quote posts. But it also needs to be easier to see all the follows of people you follow and to see all the replies to a post.
"If there's a business model but they don't charge you, the you are not the customer, you are the merchandise."
It simply should not be part of private enterprise…
I hope that is what we learned from the passed few years; shady intransparent algorithms, manipulation, doxing, fake news, propaganda, right wing biased ownership and manipulating elections, collecting personal data, anything else?
Finally regulations are starting to take shape with the EU digital services act.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package
@mimsical a former boss of mine, who was a seasoned player of poker, once told me - “if you look around the table, and can’t quite work out who has the bad hand ( is the mug ), then it’s probably you”
Similarly, another wise person said “if you can’t see the product, you’re the product” or words to that effect
Every time someone signs up at these conspiring platforms, that someone makes identity theft look more convincing. In parallel to living being's blog entries, under scrutiny, we can observe other covert actions. Shadowbanning on YouTube, Twitter, etc. Reddit doesn't even hide it.