The planet itself will be fine. The planet is not dying. It will always find stasis.
The issue, however, is whether or not we make OURSELVES extinct.
The planet itself will be fine. The planet is not dying. It will always find stasis.
The issue, however, is whether or not we make OURSELVES extinct.
The planet will be fine, the biosphere will not, I am afraid.
Exactly. We need to reframe what's actually at stake here.
All life. Naturally. :)
@JenWojcik this, this and 100 times this.
The issue needs to be urgently reframed. It is not saving “the planet”, it is saving our civilization.

One great big festering neon distraction
I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied
Learn to swim, learn to swim, learn to swim
'Cause Mom's gonna fix it all soon
Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be
“This is what you must remember: the ending of one story is just the beginning of another. This has happened before, after all. People die. Old orders pass. New societies are born. When we say 'the world has ended,' it’s usually a lie, because the /planet/ is just fine.”
~ /The Fifth Season/, N.K. Jemisin.
Absolutely agree, our time on the planet is vanishingly small, compared to the age of the Earth, although my personal preference instead of "stasis" would be "balance."
#GeorgeHarrison had it right, "all things must pass," I just wonder how many, if any, other species are instruments of their own passing?
@JenWojcik i really hate reply guys, but here i go anyway.
the actual worst case scenario is that we release so much carbon that earth ends up like venus - i.e. dead. but, we'll probably collapse civilisation and the carbon extraction machine before that happens...