@rbreich What's old is new again? The argument of economics inhibit or limit the disadvantaged's freedom. Alexander Hamilton made a similar argument, but in favor of oligarchy based on the elitist idea that oligarchs, or men of leisure, would be best able to objectively weigh political decisions and reach decisions without being influenced by personal gain because their wealth insulated them from the effects. Andrew Shankman - Original Intents.

Maybe rethinking the society and its ideals?

@rbreich
Can we really be free if we're ruled by a post-policy party that takes away the right to choose?

The right to take drugs you likely need?

The right for non-straight couples to wed?

For now, they say they only oppose these things. Well, based on what we've seen from numerous outlets, we can safely say that if we give 'em an inch, they'll go more than a mile.

@rbreich The concept certainly starts to lose its flavor.

Could be something medical, but who can afford just a random doctor's visit whenever part of their body shuts down, eh?

@rbreich I would love a conversation about the similarities and differences between being enslaved and being a women in the U.S.

Women could not have their own bank accounts until 1974. My mother had to share a passport with my father. Protections for domestic violence are still paltry. And now, we don’t control our bodies.

Maternal mortality for Black and native women has *doubled* in the last decade.

Women are still treated like property way too often.