Pretty sure they learned to deduct vacant commercial properties from their taxes a long time ago. It's like deBeers and diamonds. They keep the abundance of the supply hidden to keep the prices up. But your core point is still 100% correct.
@luckytran if it was only about money there should be two factions. The owners of the buildings pushing for it and the companies leasing pushing for work from home.
They're willing to sacrifice profits to make sure you're miserable
Why don't companies want more remote workers? Wouldn't this save money on office space and other costs. I've telecommuted for two decades. My boss doesn't pay me extra for my electricity, coffee, etc.
@luckytran I'm not even sure that's it either since if they were full they'd still have to pay for the offices.
In my experience It's mostly been about the feeling of being in charge.
@luckytran The telltale sign was that there are health risks from remote work, but they're silent about comparable health risks at places of work.
Call center jobs require people to also remain at their desks for long periods of time, and therefore have the same risks claimed to be in remote work. Then there's jobs that are physically straining, and wear out people's bodies.
That last statement coves most blue collar work:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cable-tech-dick-cheney-sex-dungeon_n_5c0ea571e4b06484c9fd4c21
@luckytran I honestly don't think they really even care about making money. Embracing remote work means they have a broader pool of talent to draw from. It also means they don't have to spend as much money on offices.
But guess what? The people who most want to do remote work are women, people of color, and trans people. And most of the decision-makers are rich white cis men. So we end up with drivel about "spontaneous hallway conversations" that we've been hearing for a long time.
@luckytran There's something weird here, though. Sure, remote work hurts landlords' profits, but how does it impact employers' bottom line? If employers are paying for unoccupied space, sure, that's expensive, but isn't paying for occupied space equally expensive?
This doesn't have anything to do with the money. It's about the control. I suspect that with widespread remote work, employees have greater mobility, and therefore greater bargaining power, and *that* is really where the bottom line will be threatened.
@luckytran They're also doing a rubbish job of it.
The whole "this is what remote workers will look like in X years" was already done 2 flipping years ago. Just this time they used a woman.
And the whole "remote is sedentary" bollocks, too: yeah, cuz the office was *the* place for anyone who wanted to maintain a healthy and active lifestyle.