#Twitter has completely cut off public access to posts. Twitter accounts are now unable to share anything with non-Twitter people. Direct links no longer work, which is a disaster for accounts distributing public information.

This is a textbook example of why you should have your own server as part of a federated social network. Ownership means your public links will never break, federation means you can reach a mass audience.

It's VERY easy to set up your own server: https://growyourown.services/grow-your-own-social-network

Grow your own social network – Grow Your Own Services

@homegrown Don't forget the tracking potential of that.

@JesseF8693

Oh yeah, definitely! There are many different reasons why it's a good idea to have your own server:

https://growyourown.services/why-growing-your-own-services-is-a-good-idea/

Why growing your own services is a good idea! – Grow Your Own Services

@homegrown I’m still able to access it. I wonder if it’s a regional thing or just a bug?

@JoeCotellese

Remnants of some kind of local caching system maybe?

Where I live, everything on Twitter now leads to a login screen.

@homegrown @JoeCotellese as I understand it, it depends on if you are logged in and have a session/cookie active. No active session, no content.
@homegrown just confirmed that I cannot see Twitter if I try to browse an account from Safari privacy mode.
@homegrown
Fine by me. Nothing is taking me back to that horrorshow.
@homegrown twitter is now as annoying to browse as pinterest and i'm loving it

@homegrown I think you're way overselling "very easy" here.

For us long in the beard, old time admins, sure. But for jo-user, it's still way out of reach.

@x1101

I don't think it is difficult any more, thanks to managed hosting companies. You don't need tech skills, a managed hosting company does all the installation, maintenance and upgrades.

That's why I set up this website, to let people know. An instance owner doesn't need to do techy stuff any more.

Instance settings are entirely through the same graphical web interface that they would use for their normal account settings.

@homegrown I think we're using different metrics for "easy".

Until it's "signing up for an email account" easy, it's still going to be beyond the skill level of a lot of people.

I'm not disagreeing about it having gotten loads better. I remember the nightmare that was running an identi.ca server. But "miles better" isn't "so easy anyone can do it"

@x1101

The signup process for services like https://masto.host etc is about similar complexity to signing up with an email provider or registering for an account on an online shop. It pretty much is an online shop really, you just pick which plan you want and fill in your payment details.

The one possibly tricky bit is pointing the domain name to the host, because it may involve two different providers. But that is a one-off thing that the domain company can possibly deal with for a fee.

Masto.host - Fully Managed Mastodon Hosting

Masto.host was built from the ground up to make running a Mastodon instance easy.

Masto.host
@homegrown @x1101 But... But... But I LOVE the techy stuff!!!

@wbpeckham @homegrown oh, no doubt. I do too.

I'm just trying to call attention to a trap I fell in for a long time. "Easy for me" isn't "easy for everyone" or even "easy for the target audience"

@homegrown Elon Musk is not thinking.gosh
@homegrown Setting up might be easy. But the devil is in the maintenance...

@dancingtreefrog

The technical maintenance is handled by the managed hosting service. They do all upgrades, bug fixes, installations etc behind the scenes, you don't have to think about it at all.

The only burden on the owner is if they decide to run a public instance that's open to public sign-ups. In that case, the moderation burden does become very significant.

@homegrown Thanks, I figured moderation would be significant. I used to teach a web development course aimed at businesses setting out to get their first website up. One phase of the class was planning the site. And that phase included planning for content maintenance, updates and moderation. Kind of a lesson for managers that figured they could just dump that task on a secretary...
Costs of such a managed hosting service?

@dancingtreefrog

Managed hosting costs are surprisingly low, starts from about $10 a month including tax for five active users. The hosting cost per user drops massively as the number of users goes up, it's about $100 a month including tax for 2000 active users.

However, as the number of users goes up, the labour cost of moderation rises significantly, so this balances out the savings on hosting costs. It would be good to encourage smaller servers where human moderation is more feasible.

@dancingtreefrog

And yeah, setting up an online social network is definitely a long term commitment! It can't be seen as a "create and forget" thing.

@homegrown
So I shall just be a user, not an admin. πŸ˜ƒ
@homegrown links are broken?! How on earth are they going to make money out of twitter if tracking no longer works? This is a disaster I've worked in online Ad industry and every second I'm just more shocked. They should be losing money like every 10^-10000 second

@alixx

It's almost as if Musk has no idea what he is doing.