Found something remarkable (and also quite sad).

In 1997, Wired published "The Long Boom", a hyper-optimistic article about how we'd achieve Utopia by 2020.

The authors included notes on some "scenario spoilers"—negative events that might send is in a worse direction.

...and those spoilers turned out to be almost spookily accurate.

https://www.wired.com/1997/07/longboom/

@ThisWeekInThe90s Eh.

2: They actually haven’t been a bust, but the economic boom from it has all gone to the wealthy.

3: Russia was already a kleptocracy run by mafia-types and has always been xenophobic.

4: Depends on your definition of Eastern Europe, but many joined in 2004, with the latest in 2013 being Croatia. Yes, Brexit, but the EU is carrying on fine without it.

6: Crime is still largely down in the US at least, and terrorism is no worse than in 97.

@ThisWeekInThe90s
7: Cancer has not overwhelmed our health system. (And “ill-prepared” is a very USian POV.)

8: Hasn’t happened, even with continued unrest in the Middle East. Alternate energy sources continue to grow.

9: Covid was bad, but only 1/10 as bad as that estimate.

10: Yes there is pushback, especially in the US and UK, but not to the extent that progress has stopped.

Which means 1 right, and it took 24-25 years to really heat up.

@ThisWeekInThe90s Some of the things feel more real than they actually are. Even our near-peer contest with China hasn’t done much to dampen things. The true culprit is, imo, the advances in technology making the rich richer, as well as (in the US at least) our failure to tax them at a reasonable rate.
@queenofnewyork
...& that's a HUGE miss on their part, since the premise of the whole thing is that the New Economy would democritize everything.
@ThisWeekInThe90s
@FeralRobots @queenofnewyork @ThisWeekInThe90s whereas instead it has only accelerated the movement of wealth to the (top fraction of) 1%.
@sspopovich
I didn't understand their reasoning at the time & don't understand it now*, but Kelly for one has repeatedly doubled-down on it.
🤷
@queenofnewyork @ThisWeekInThe90s
_
*I'm probably giving them too much credit for intellectual honesty.
@queenofnewyork Total COVID deaths is approaching 7 million, so more like 3/10 than 1/10. Total infections is well over 600 million, so 3x worse.
@queenofnewyork @ThisWeekInThe90s #1 is less of a thing than many others on that list.

@queenofnewyork @ThisWeekInThe90s

I would definitely call crypto currencies a bust. It hasn't petered out yet, but its original promise (as a currency) hasn't worked out at all, and instead it became an overhyped investment distraction. Some other tech promises, like self-driving cars, also don't seem to be happening. Although there's also a lot of tech that did pay off.

#6: I read the description as mostly being about the fear caused by it. And fear is definitely up. In the wake of 9/11, many terrible laws were passed, and the world as a whole got a lot more distrustful. I think this is the big one that has loomed heavy over the past 20 years. It has destabilised the world and made people a lot more xenophobic. Nazis are back, for crying out loud.

@mcv @ThisWeekInThe90s Decent point on the fear. Though Nazis never went away, they just were shunned more than they are now.
@queenofnewyork @ThisWeekInThe90s you missed 9/11 and two trillion dollar wars that resulted from it.
@ThisWeekInThe90s wow, they even got the plague right
@Lyle @ThisWeekInThe90s Plagues are kinda predictable tho, based on rate of mutation in viral genome. Health experts had been expecting a big flu pandemic at least since early 1990s. It just turned out to be a coronavirus this time.
@ThisWeekInThe90s I remember reading that and thinking some of the spoilers were pretty likely. Sucks being right sometimes.

@ThisWeekInThe90s

As suspected, we are in fact in the bad timeline.

@ThisWeekInThe90s i find it fascinating that the link still works, I was in high school back then and the internet was still a baby. Also, the use of the word "meme".
@201d @ThisWeekInThe90s Yeah, using “meme” is kinda making me question that this is actually from 1997.
@ThisWeekInThe90s I remember thinking that article was hopefully optimistic. I need to pay more attention to this section!
@ThisWeekInThe90s
Sometimes I kind of wish today's problems hadn't been so predictable. Maybe cishet white folks didn't see it coming, but.... The signs were always there.
Wired 1997 07 OCR : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Wired 1997 07 OCR

Internet Archive
@ThisWeekInThe90s suprised to see the pushback in 6, like 9/11 and subsequent response didn’t shake the works massively for the worse.
@ThisWeekInThe90s @arthurwyatt September 11 2001 is the point at which The Long Boom turned into The Long Siege
@acb @ThisWeekInThe90s “that end of history you thought you were having? Guess again”

@acb @ThisWeekInThe90s @arthurwyatt Other events I’d say killed ‘The Long Boom’ were the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, the Dot Com crash, and the Global Financial Crisis/Great Recession.

That said, 9/11 feels like the inflection point where the US “long national nightmare of peace and prosperity” (to quote the Onion) ended.

@ThisWeekInThe90s

Today: oh no! Everything is awful because these things no one could have predicted.

… 🙄

@ThisWeekInThe90s Pretty close but the "major ecological crisis" was already ongoing and they should have been aware of it.

@ThisWeekInThe90s

"Spookily accurate" or "completely foreseeable"?

@ThisWeekInThe90s I don’t know if you can consider predictions based on historical tendencies of certain populations to be particularly “spooky” tbh.
@ThisWeekInThe90s perhaps of all of them, 10 depresses me the most 😿

@ThisWeekInThe90s
1997: Wow, even if three of those happen it'd be catastrophic, but that'd be extremely unlikely

2023: *looks around nervously*

@ThisWeekInThe90s @lisamelton if I recall, the authors formed the Global Business Network and advised major corporations on futurist scenarios and long range planning. Stewart Brand joined Peter in GBN and for a short while things looked optimistic. I don’t know what happened other than what Naomi Klein’s book The Shock Doctrine details as the counter weight of greed prevailed.
@ThisWeekInThe90s Turns out we could see it coming.
@ThisWeekInThe90s only big one they missed was rampant corporate corruption and takeover of government motivated purely by greed. Imagine if all those record profits were instead quality of life improvements throughout all of society. I'd like to see that timeline.
@fluxion
I wouldn't say they *missed* it. More like, *actively encouraged* it.
@ThisWeekInThe90s

@ThisWeekInThe90s @mikeabney wow I remember that article.

Ooof.

@ThisWeekInThe90s Oof, 10 out of 10. Well done, Wired?
@ThisWeekInThe90s oh, and we were _this_ close!
@ThisWeekInThe90s It seems that futurists are better at predicting what will go wrong than what will go right.

@ThisWeekInThe90s

Somehow it looks like "the free-market economy" and it's existing power structures simply bended the road at key point decisions always towards the existing structures, preventing key tec like solar, wind as well as biodiversity preservation to happen. The "liberal" democracy is and wasn't able to make the right choices due to "cultural" stubbornness and prevailing monetary interests.

The limits of consumerism for everyone weren't taken into account.
"Club of Rome" unheard.

@ThisWeekInThe90s

That last point is incredibly sad, because that's exactly what's happening right now.

@ThisWeekInThe90s We ignored the warnings and built the Torment Nexus.
:-(
@ThisWeekInThe90s
New conspiracy theory.
The people at the WEF(or insert bogeyman of your choice) read that and said let's make it happen.
@ThisWeekInThe90s They nailed most of them, but #10 may be the most important.
@ThisWeekInThe90s
Leaving aside that 2 & 3 were already (& obviously) well underway at the time, the whole thing was complete nonsense when that article was published. That whole "new economy" line made hilariously unwarranted assumptions about social inertia & even distribution of the future. One could say they were deeply selective in their reading of cyberpunk.

@ThisWeekInThe90s It's almost like you should listen to those warning you about the things...

Only problem is they didn't go far enough even though it was all completely foreseeable

@Aviva_Gary @ThisWeekInThe90s I was a Wired subscriber in those days, and I remember reading that article in the magazine. (Magazines! I miss paper magazines.) The warnings didn't really register with me, nor I suspect with many other people at the time, because we were all swimming in the same warm sea of techno-optimism.