Ugh. Wtf is this nonsense.

The norm is against politicized prosecution; not against prosecution of politicians.

Not only do many countries prosecute politicians, including former presidents, but the *United States* does too, incl of congressmen or former presidents from the other party

@Pwnallthethings “Experts” eh? Do they believe in the rule of law, the Constitution and equal justice?
@bradpatrick @Pwnallthethings “Expert” = rich white man who uses his power to enforce the status quo

@Pwnallthethings

How did they find experts in something that has never happened before?

@Pwnallthethings

Oh that right... Dersh is still out there giving interviews. No wonder they say experts instead of giving names.

@That_AC @Pwnallthethings these are good questions that the corporate media don't want us seriously considering

@Pwnallthethings

Some Americans badly crave having a king again. Democracy overwhelms them.

@waterluvian @Pwnallthethings I should do my dissertation on people who just aren’t cut out for democracy.
@Pwnallthethings Who are these so-called experts? Why aren't they providing named sources? Ugh.
@Pwnallthethings France and Japan have somehow managed to survive the prosecution of former leaders.

@Pwnallthethings

"Experts say..."

It sounds so very much like Trump himself:

"Everybody knows..."

@Pwnallthethings the corporate mainstream media is complicit.
@Pwnallthethings I wonder what those experts say about the U.S. government refusing to criminally prosecute a brazen criminal just because he is a former leader who declared his candidacy specifically as a political shield against accountability for the crimes at issue. Might that test the nation's democratic system in a manner that stretches far beyond the merits of the case itself? 🤔
@Pwnallthethings exactly. This is the Trump narrative. Ask Spiro Agnew.
@Pwnallthethings Those "Experts" should brush up on the Constitution, separation of powers and the rule of law, without which a true democracy cannot exist.
@Pwnallthethings
Infuriating. SHAME on ABC News for this dangerous nonsense.
@Pwnallthethings The “merits of the case” are profoundly significant. If he gets in office again, it will be way worse: a complete and total dictatorship.
@Pwnallthethings Click porn from #ABC for the maggots out there - nice job covering what now passes for news and investigative journalism
@Pwnallthethings
If the name was Obama or Clinton, I'm confident the narrative would be different
@Pwnallthethings please find abc’s contact info & leave your well-worded opinion.
Even tho it sucks we have to call all this bs out. Trump disrupted everything enough.
Media doesn’t have to keep stocking it
@Pwnallthethings ABC is showing who they are.
Believe them, when they show you.
@Pwnallthethings
Who the frick are these "experts"? "Experts" also say if you cross your eyes, they'll get stuck that way.

@Pwnallthethings As a French, i'm really happy that Sarkozy is getting condemned, and will probably be again for a few things, head of states should be exemplary, the office shouldn't be a pass to avoid jail for crimes.

Are these "experts" named, or are they a rhetorical device to give weight to the author opinion?

List of American federal politicians convicted of crimes - Wikipedia

@Pwnallthethings Did Mango Mussolini write this? "Many people are saying..." "Experts say..." What "experts"? Who are they? Name names.

Garbage reporting.

@Pwnallthethings Someone on Scripps News yesterday was saying the next president "whoever it is" will have to "think about pardoning Trump."
@Pwnallthethings
And its not like the Republicans haven't practiced such political games for years now without the massive clearcut criming (Durham report, Bengasi, and possibly/arguably Whitewater).
@Pwnallthethings also like… what’s the alternative ABC? We just let them break laws with impunity because there’s an election? 😐
@Pwnallthethings @JamesGleick Not prosecuting crimes because the person is a politician IS a politicized prosecution decision! They keep flipping things on their heads!
@corbden
@Pwnallthethings

To the GQP, it's less "you can't prosecute politicians for their (real) crimes", it's that "you can't prosecute
our politicians for their (real) crimes" (but feel free to lynch not "our" politicians and/or their families for various affronts).

@Pwnallthethings

That ABC News quote is some serious BS. 😏

When you're paid to write on deadline, you WILL come up with something to write.

#journalism

@Pwnallthethings Was there a norm against former presidents consciously committing felonies. Was that ever a norm

@Pwnallthethings

Seems like yet another variation of "only Democrats have agency."

@Pwnallthethings

Dear. Lord.

US news organizations have learned nothing since 2015.

Despite the title ABC News, this is opinion, opinion of the worst kind. No sources. Handwaving. Had I turned this in for an assignment while in J-school, it would have gotten an F. If one of my undergrads did it today, I’d be writing “who says” throughly. BS.

Here’s the link:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/donald-trump-indicted-time-sources/story?id=99408228

Donald Trump indicted for 2nd time, in classified documents investigation: Sources

ABC News
@Pwnallthethings And not applying the law to a citizen who appears to have committed serious criminal law violations with potentially devastating repercussions because he formerly held public office would not upset an important norm? Damn fools.
@Pwnallthethings I’m from Illinois. We jail our politicians.
@ymasumac @Pwnallthethings Shit, I'm from Massachusetts, and we let ours run the city of Boston from a jail cell.
@Pwnallthethings The long standing norm is not having a criming President.
@Pwnallthethings the norms were upended by TFG.
@Pwnallthethings It's peak "making powerful people responsible for their crimes is treason" season.
@Pwnallthethings "experts" can eat one (1) entire bag of dicks
@Pwnallthethings « Experts »… Name them or shut up, ABC. I’m pretty sure these so-called “experts” have (R) after their names.
@Pwnallthethings well 🤔🤔 FUCK those “experts” 😁
@Pwnallthethings not quite correct. the US has never prosecuted a former President.

@Pwnallthethings

I mean... they're not *wrong.* But they're not arguing in good faith either.

Yeah, it upends traditions. But traditions need upended now and again, and frankly, it's supposed to be the job of the left, the "liberals," to do that.

For the last couple decades the traditions have been getting overturned by the "conservatives" first, as they've fought to re-inact extreme voter limitations and power-grabs.

Overturn those norms, before you have no power to overturn anything else.

@Pwnallthethings

For shame @ABCNews promulgating this partisan hackery.

They should Read The Indictment.

@Pwnallthethings The norm is nobody is above the law, and anyone caught violating the law is subject to prosecution. The only thing unusual in this case is that the suspect used to be president. And that point is irrelevant to the administration of justice.
@slcw @Pwnallthethings
That point SHOULD BE irrelevant to the administration of justice.
#nopersonisabovethelaw
#lockhimup
@Pwnallthethings rule of law is literally a core tenet of the founding on this country. We are who we are because even presidents are accountable.
@Pwnallthethings Experts say it might have been a mistake to elect a sociopathic mob boss. Normalcy-biased news reports that papered over his flaws to provide "balance" enabled dangerous, unethical, and, in the end, illegal behavior.
@Pwnallthethings @donmelton Off the top of my head: Rod Blagoyovic (sp?), Kwame Kilpatrick, Jim Guy Tucker, Bill Campbell… this isn’t hard, y’all.
@Pwnallthethings

Much like stupid people don't (really) get irony, most don't get nuance, either.
@Pwnallthethings Once again a major media outlet is extremely invested in fucking Americans.