@largess @pedbikeinfo @bikepedantic Cyclists deaths from crashes take place disproportionately on higher speed roadways in the US. People bike on them anyway because in many cases, they are the only option for getting from point A to point B.

Fully separated facilities away from the noise & air pollution of these roads would be ideal, but unrealistic in the near term and, sadly, in the medium term as well.

So if we can at least reduce the risk of fatal crashes in the near term, we must.

@DrTCombs I'll build on Dr Combs' thoughts more bluntly: Not accommodating people on bikes with safer infrastructure only because it's not otherwise appealing to ride is elite projection in bike planning. If we're serious about bicyclist safety, we're making things safer for bicycling even in contexts where getting more people to choose to bike is unlikely. @largess @pedbikeinfo

@bikepedantic @largess @pedbikeinfo Boosting @bikepedantic's reply here doesn't feel nearly strong enough. I would like to shout it from the rooftops, please.

"If we're serious about bicyclist safety, we're making things safer for bicycling even in contexts where getting more people to choose to bike is unlikely."

@DrTCombs @bikepedantic @largess @pedbikeinfo could omit the word bicyclist

"If we're serious about traffic safety, we're making things safer for bicycling even in contexts where getting more people to choose to bike is unlikely."
#VisionZero

@enobacon @DrTCombs @bikepedantic @largess @pedbikeinfo Love the evolution of this essential point. Could add walking as well.

"If we're serious about traffic safety, we're making things safer for bicycling and walking even in contexts where getting more people to choose to bike or walk is unlikely."

#VisionZero #RoadSafety #SafetyOverSpeed #ZeroTrafficDeaths #infrastructure #transportation #CompleteStreets

@BarbChamberlain @DrTCombs @bikepedantic @largess @pedbikeinfo I'm not against walking but as a planning-level goal, making everywhere accessible by bike (or trike or adaptive bike, with bikeways for all ages and abilities) will essentially solve that issue. Portland has really shot itself in both feet with its political bike allergy and trying to make it up with a bus every 15-30 minutes except on weekends + now a fare hike. Don't be like Portland, take care of bikes and the rest will follow.
@enobacon I'm a vehicle passenger on a 5 lane arterial right now with bike lanes both sides, sidewalk only one side. As a bonus for pedestrians, sidewalk periodically switches sides of the road so they'd have to keep crossing at intersections to have a facility designed for their movement. Not safe system approach.

@BarbChamberlain That seems to underscore my point, and that of the OP. Until you can do better than a painted bike gutter on a stroad, it is going to be unpleasant for pedestrians.

AND I'll bet that bit of buffer makes it slightly safer besides a place to walk when the sidewalk stops (I definitely see plenty of people walking in our bike gutters where there are no sidewalks.) Now switch the outer lanes to bus+turn only and you'll be getting somewhere, like actual drivers-out-of-cars stuff.

@enobacon Not just unpleasant--inaccessible to a person in a wheelchair or a blind person who needs truncated dome guides. I don't think we're on opposite sides here, but "bikes first and everyone will be fine" is not how I approach my work in active transportation. I don't pit modes against each other; I want to work together to get the system changed to work for all, not just some. #accessibility #transportation #MoveEquity #MobilityJustice
@BarbChamberlain actual all-ages-and-abilities bikeways provide that accessibility sooner than is feasible, at a network level, for sidewalks. And once it's actually a connected low-stress network, drivers will switch to bikes. We really don't have time on this planet to continue the transportation status-quo. No DOT should be pouring concrete until they've completely connected that scrapped-together AAA bikeway network out of repurposed car lanes. Everything else is designed for 50yrs ago.

@BarbChamberlain an example of the actual conditions we're dealing with: https://urbanists.social/@enobacon/110443660522214889

Cars are given 2 extra freeway lanes & people are left with scraps. The idea that we need to have a bake sale for a protected bike lane and concrete sidewalk "#CompleteStreets" so as not to disrupt the #carSupremacy is why #Portland's #SWcorridor plan failed. Without operational priority on a #mobilityLaneNetwork, #transit is politically & practically infeasible.

see also https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/who-else-benefits-from-the-dutch-cycling-infrastructure/

😀🚲 (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image #PBOT had a survey about the idea of a #roundabout at #Multnomah & #GardenHomeRd. Over 2/3rds of respondents asked for some kind of separated path on this stretch of Multnomah. There is always someone walking in this bike lane. The project was complicated by how to prioritize left turns into the driveway of the bar (where the very same #drunkDriver from the above crash had last been drinking.) Nothing has been done. #CityThatPlans #Cars1stAlwaysOnly

Urbanists.Social