@dangillmor @mmasnick I know it makes me finicky, but:
1) boilerplate EULA terms
2) minimal moderation capability
3) no block feature, then rushed out block feature
Suggest to me that Bluesky really is ill-prepared to run a social network. They're going down the usual techbro path of putting 45% effort into engineering, 45% effort into looking cool for a handful of investors, 10% effort into solving known difficult problems of products like theirs.
@mmasnick @dangillmor Sure, Bluesky has a plan for moderation: the 'community' will do it, via server-level moderation and third-party 'community labeling' and so forth.
Which is a plan, I suppose, but it's not operational. Their primary moderation method is not even alpha testing yet. If it's true they know what they're doing, then the takeaway is they don't really care about moderation at all, it's an afterthought.
@mmasnick @maxkennerly @dangillmor moderation and blocking are MVP features for a social media app these days, since we all know that they are critical to a successful platform
I would say that their beta is premature from a technical perspective and looks like a FOMO marketing stunt
@mmasnick @maxkennerly @dangillmor yeah, I think you are wrong, too.
I'm not sniffing around for the next great social network, so I have a particular bias against hype
@mmasnick @maxkennerly @dangillmor don't worry, I will.
It's clearly not ready yet, which is exactly what I said
Attached: 1 image Dorsey will be happy with one arm of #Bluesky being used by his advisor Ali Alexander to plan the next armed Proud Boys/GOP attack on the Capitol building - and the other arm being used by you to fruitlessly bemoan SCOTUS corruption & the New Jim Crow voting restrictions, & what he & Musk undoubtedly delight, behind closed doors, in referring to as "woke nonsense." The $ & power asymmetry makes this work for the GOP. No content moderation means no pesky Congressional hearings for him & Musk.
@mmasnick @maxkennerly @dangillmor Isn't a crucial part of Bluesky's USP the fact that you don't need to understand the difference between the protocol and the service? Especially compared to Mastodon?
There's a major issue of trust here that is coloring the argument. From your posts, I infer that you trust Bluesky to act in its users' best interests and to rapidly fix what other people say are dealbreaking flaws.
If you're more skeptical, you get to a different argument pretty quickly.