A timely reminder that “punishable by fine” means “legal for the rich.”

@aral It doesn't properly do what it's supposed to, but there's a model of "day fines" used at least in Finland where fines are based on the daily income of the person.

"10 day fine" -fine would be 450 EUR for someone earning 3000 EUR per month, and 4950 EUR for someone earning 30k EUR.

(There's a bit of nonlinearity at the low end of the scale due to deductions for living expenses.)

Should be based on the wealth and income both, then it would be much better...

@aral True! Eat the rich!
« Punishable by fine not indexed on your wealth » to be more precise, but yes. Yes indeed.
@aral Oligarchs world-wide: "Blowing up democracy is only 775 billion USD? I'll take two!"
@aral Never understood why fines are a fixed value and not % of one's monthly income / net worth 🫥
@[email protected]@[email protected] some crimes in spain (and europe I think) have a thing called "day fine". The crime takes in account your salary and takes "a number of days" of your salary as the fine thing. so no matter if you are poor or good on money, it hurts
Aral Balkan (@[email protected])

59.3K Posts, 11.3K Following, 46.8K Followers · Social oncologist. I make small things. Unapologetically anti-genocide. Warning: May not fit your taxonomy. From Gaza? If you need to get verified, please go here: https://gaza-verified.org/join/ Want to donate to people in Gaza? Please see https://gaza-verified.org/donate/ My posts are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) 🍉🌻 🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ #SmallWeb #SmallTech #web #tech #privacy #humanRights #personhood #democracy #aral #fedi22 #searchable

Aral’s fediverse server
@gabboman @aral @Maiko This is my canonical go-to example for that sort of idea - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1759791.stm. Old story about a Nokia exec fined $100k for doing 45 in a 30 zone.
BBC News | EUROPE | Nokia boss gets record speeding fine

A director of the Finnish telecommunications giant, Nokia, receives what is believed to be the most expensive speeding ticket ever.

@gabboman @aral @Maiko Sweden do that with fines for driving at unsafe speeds and set the world record speeding fine at ~$1M in 2010. I think possibly Finland do it too? I strongly feel that this should be practiced everywhere.
@aral
It is time that fines were scaled from a base fine to one based on income/wealth. The meaning of a fine is determent. It should penalize the rich to a point of pain as much as the poor. I think that would be democratic. Or perhape we could bring back the pillory. That too would be most democratic and make as much sense as the death penalty or the new abortion laws. Exorbitant fines for the rich and pillory. Let us equal the playing fields of justice.
#Fines
#justice
#democracy
@aral I think we already did the cutting of limbs thing a while back, that wasn't well received either. What are you proposing?
@mckean Something tells me there are quite a few steps we could take between fines and cutting off limbs, don’t you? :)
@aral it seems we didn't take many steps with the initial statement, so why suddenly add more steps? I do like your statement, but it is flawed.

@aral

Tax deductible cost of business

@aral
Jail kinda frightens them, though.
@aral depends on where you live, for example in #Finland the traffic ticket is based on your income, so the rich may have to pay €60.000 while a poor may just pay €580.
@aral nothing has changed. This is from 1764.
@aral it's almost like they hoarded resources precisely for this purpose
@aral unless your lesislature fines per means such as Finland
@aral fines are not the issue, it's just that amounts for fines should be relative to income/wealth, not an absolute number.
@aral this wasn’t a fine. But ok.
@aral Asset-proportional fines would fix that.

@aral

Just as before the US civil war it meant "legal for white people" since punishments for Black people meant whippings, mutilations, and murders. In many cases the laws are unchanged apart from subbing in jail time for brutality.

@aral All fines should automatically increase or reduce based on the target's financial means — a 10$ fine for a poor person should be thousands of dollars for the middle class, and millions of dollars for the rich, billions for corporations.
Low Quality Facts (@[email protected])

Dominion-Fox Settlement: If you want to deceive the American public and undermine democracy it costs $787.5 million. Billionaires, holding out their wallets: I'll take ten please.

Mastodon 🐘
@aral Example: I once knew a VC who would take the HOV lane when alone and just pay the couple of tickets a year they got for violating the rules. They believed the time savings accrued by staying out of traffic was worth the fine.
@amd A VC, you say. How shocking.
@amd @aral An example explaining why in multiple countries the road fine amount is proportional to your income (verified on the spot by the police agent). So that the "incentive" to not do it is adapted to your wealth.
@amd @aral Too bad the enforcement took the form of tickets, rather than electronically-controlled moving bollards.

@amd @aral

I once knew a guy who said there should be a $50 lane in the Holland Tunnel, on similar logic.

Also, I have represented a few street-level pot dealers. They view the occasional few days in jail every year somewhat like we view paying our taxes: it's a necessary annoyance that comes with making a living. If we got a single bust for dealing pot, our lives would probably be ruined. But a professional? What's one more misdemeanor guilty plea to him?

@amd @aral I think this may be more common than we know. Decades back, my friend had told of someone who had his driver speed regularly on highways and just pay the fine if caught. He valued his time and had the money. #India
@amd
Depending on their hourly rate, sadly, this might be the "right" choice. We need fines relative to income (at least!)
@aral
@aral As the delightful, insightful John "Leverage" Rogers often states, "A fine is a price."

@aral

Only if the fine is a fixed amount. :D

In Finland parking fines are a percentage of your yearly income, so the more money you earn, the more you pay. :D

@BillySmith @aral

fines in UK for larger speeding offences are also proportionate to income (albeit with a top limit, but its a few grand so only the very rich could shrug it off).

However, repeated traffic offences seem much more likely to result in a longer driving ban in UK than in other European countries, which is more of a punishment to a person who is speeding (as they are generally doing so because they enjoy driving)

@aral What you do is fine if you can pay this much.
@aral
“Guilty until proven wealthy”

@aral

but do we want to lock up people that aren't dangerous? all the options suck. maybe fines that vary by wealth?

@aral The only fine this wouldn't entirely apply to would be one based on a percentage of net worth.
@allenstenhaus @aral I don't think "punishable by tax" as you describe would be much different.
@allenstenhaus @aral I.e. if you take away one percent of a millionaire's net worth, they're still a millionaire. If you take away one percent of the net worth of someone who spends all their money on rent, they become homeless.
@eviloatmeal @aral My net worth is a negative number. If you're concerned poor people would be worse off, I think you'll find it's more likely the opposite. Many poor people have a negative net worth, so they would pay nothing.
@allenstenhaus @aral Hmm... I suppose. Although I feel like that's what they say about taxes, too.
@aral Unless the fine is adjusted to your wealth. Like the news from Finland where dudes get multi-million euro fines for speeding lol
Jeff Bezos paid more than $16,000 in parking tickets while renovating his DC mansion

News organization WUSA9 found that people racked up more than $16,000 in parking tickets on the street outside Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos’ new Washington, DC mansion.

The Verge