@Joementum @hethwill
Absolutely.
Among my last efforts in the US IC before retirement was to expand analysts' familiarity with that toolset.
It is a framework that I come back to again and again.
For example, I think Sabin's modelling of deployment is genius, demonstrating the importance of having a force capable of securing positions key to gaining the upper hand in an engagement. And he makes it quick and fun.
Yet, we often skip this critical phase on the gaming table.
Yeah, exactly this. How else could it have worked?
But I have to admit to being fully indoctrinated into Professor Sabin's way of thinking for a little while now, so maybe I am a tiny bit biased...
It's weird - we always believed in Mark's product, but I have never played Mark's rules (please don't tell him)!
We had just finished our own epic journey in that scale and moved on to other things when Mark's rules were released.
But you offer very high praise indeed. Noted.
@hethwill
Heheh!
Yeah, a 1:1 of Cannae. I will be very interested in how Mark plays that out. In a positive, supportive way, of course!
We did look at doing Cannae at that scale but decided it was better done as a board game.
The ground scales and command and control mechanisms stretch the bounds of credibility, and at that point, you start to challenge the 'historical record', and then you ask, 'Is this fun?'
Look forward to seeing Mark's take on it if I can.