The “cancel culture” and anti-“wokeism” moral panics rely on a complete inversion of the actual balance of power, portraying traditionally marginalized groups as mighty forces that urgently need to be reined in – and those in elite positions as desperately in need of protection. (Thread - 1/)
It’s an unbelievably cynical game: Some of society’s most vulnerable groups – trans people, for instance, whose fundamental rights, including their right to exist in the public square, are being stripped away – are presented as a dangerous, powerful cabal. 2/
In a way, the New York Times recently elevating an unhinged anti-“woke” crusader like Pamela Paul is actually useful: In everything she writes, the cynical inversion of  power is dialed up to 11 – which gets you to “In defense of JK Rowling.” It’s not gonna get any more obvious. 3/
Think about how silly this is: “Oh, the woke militants dominate everything over there!” – when the New York Times has just hired staunchly conservative David French to join the existing stable of famous anti-“woke” columnists like Pamela Paul, Bret Stephens, and David Brooks. 4/
The only “persecution” that is happening here is David French being criticized online. Some of that criticism may even be unfair or cross the line – the internet is a nasty place. But that’s it. No one is firing or “canceling” him. No one in a position of power is doing anything. 5/
In this way, this whole affair captures the anxiety that fuels these reactionary crusades against “wokeism” and “cancel culture”: Societal elites - and elite white men, in particular - face a little more scrutiny and public criticism today than in the past. And they don’t like that. 6/
As soon as traditionally marginalized groups gained enough power and acquired the technological means to make their demands for respect and their criticism heard, traditional elites started bemoaning “persecution” - “The hordes are coming to cancel us!” 7/
Important to note that it’s mostly the *threat* of scrutiny, the *potential* of being held to account that is enough to cause the next round of reactionary panic. In practice, the power structures that have traditionally defined American life have unfortunately held up just fine. 8/
These moral panics appeal to (predominantly white, predominantly male) elites because the threat to elite impunity is real - “cancel culture” and “wokeism” may have made it slightly more likely that people get in trouble for racist, misogynistic, disrespectful behavior. 9/
Simply put, elite life in the public spotlight has become slightly more uncomfortable, at least for elites who used to be able to get away with absolutely everything and now they (potentially) don’t anymore. People like David French and Pamela Paul get more public criticism. 10/
The reason is that traditionally marginalized groups have forced their way into the conversation, necessitating a re-negotiation of norms surrounding public speech and expression. That process can be messy at times - but the alternative is continued elite dominance and impunity. 11/
Everyone agrees that certain transgressions, certain public speech should be met with shaming or shunning. The real question is: Where is the line, and who gets to draw it? Traditionally, this was the prerogative of a predominantly white, predominantly male elite. 12/

This prerogative has come under fire. And if you believe - as much of America’s traditional elite evidently does - that you are entitled to say and do whatever you want without legal or cultural sanction, that you are entitled to unconditional affirmation, that’s bad.

But actually, it is progress. /end

Think about how cynical, how utterly vile this is: “No rights are being ‘stripped away.’ None.”

As red states have introduced *hundreds* of anti-trans bills, passing ever-more extreme anti-trans laws every week.

What an unbelievably disingenuous bigot this man is. Despicable.

So many people proudly taking the Sullivan “You’re just making stuff up” line in my responses. When this, below, is what’s happening across the U.S.
 
There is no plausible deniability for this level of willful ignorance or bigotry. You’re just telling the world who you are.

https://twitter.com/alliraine22/status/1623661865694814209?s=46&t=_53cm4rOvmKcHLu6st0Jpg

Allison Chapman 🏳️‍⚧️ on Twitter

“We have surpassed 300 Anti-LGBTQ+ bills in the USA. - 91 Gender Affirming Care Bans - 39 Sports Bans - 44 Don't Say Gay/Forced Outing bills - 27 Drag bans - 12 defining trans people out of law We are in truly unprecedented times.”

Twitter
As the reactionary assault on one of the country’s most vulnerable, most marginalized groups is escalating, anti-“woke” crusaders are focused on the real threat - elite “free speech”: “Famous billionaires need our protection! Famous NYT columnists are being persecuted!” Perfect.
Addendum - This thread isn’t even primarily about Rowling’s transphobia - but to the “She’s just protecting women!” chorus (mostly over on Twitter): Your line of thinking is predicated on the idea that trans people are inherently dangerous, rapists, predators… It’s grounded in transphobic ideology.
The idea that the struggle of trans people for recognition, equality, and respect is inherently dangerous to women and must be rejected as a threat to women’s rights is only plausible on the basis of a fundamentally discriminatory worldview that is fully in line with the reactionary crusade.
It’s the same kind of argument as “We need to protect the children” from queer teachers, the central rallying cry for homophobic reactionary campaigns since the 1970s: The plausibility of the claim depends entirely on whether or not you accept the notion that queer people tend to be “groomers.”

“How dare you accuse us of transphobia - we’re just saying that trans women are actually men merely pretending to be women who should always be treated as men, and oh, they are also inherently dangerous and tend to be child molesters and rapists.”

Keep telling us who you are.

Not that I expect anybody to change their mind - not the people who flooded my responses with aggressively transphobic “defenses” of JK Rowling, and definitely not the opinion columnists fabulating about a “woke” campaign to “cancel” a billionaire. But, anyway, for the record: https://www.vox.com/culture/23622610/jk-rowling-transphobic-statements-timeline-history-controversy
Is J.K. Rowling transphobic? Let’s let her speak for herself.

Imane Khelif’s lawsuit couldn’t keep the Harry Potter author off social media for long.

Vox
@tzimmer_history In 2007, my boss, Montgomery County (MD) Councilmember Duchy Trachtenberg, introduced a bill to include gender identity in the county’s human rights ordinance. It passed unanimously over some really ugly lobbying by anti-LGBTQ+ orgs. Along the way, I was privileged to meet and work with many trans women whose stories of courage and persistence in the face of terrible hate will stay with me always. So disappointed in Rowling #TransWomenAreWomen #InclusiveFeminism

@tzimmer_history Cishet men are the biggest threat to women of all kinds. So why aren't they focusing their efforts on that group?

(Because it's much easier to aim rage at a group you *know* to be less dangerous.)

@textualdeviance @tzimmer_history Also because they are generally thoroughly disinterested in protecting women.
@tzimmer_history I'm thoroughly disgusted and repulsed by those comments. I have a transgender daughter whom I love dearly and who was graduated at the top of her class with a perfect score on the ACT. How dare some moron relegate my daughter to being a predatory male rapist.
@tzimmer_history
Some lawmaker who can't explain how a woman's reproductive system works overriding my gynecologist's medical recommendations seems a lot more threatening to me...
@MHowell @tzimmer_history
That is a genuine threat unlike trans women.
@tzimmer_history I didn't know J.K. Rowling was so dangerous...🤔
@tzimmer_history
Relevant history, trans people made big contributions to widespread technologies on which modern life depends:
https://mstdn.social/@JohnMashey/109876287215506024
JohnMashey (@[email protected])

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Anti-trans folks might stop using things in whose creation crucial contributions were made by trans folks, like ARM microprocessors (Sophie Wilson, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Wilson) or even more pervasive, VLSI semiconductors (Lynn Conway, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_Conway), both Fellows of #ComputerHistoryMuseum, among many honors. I still have my copy of Mead-Conway book.

Mastodon 🐘
@JohnMashey @tzimmer_history this is great history for folks to know, but let's keep in mind that we trans folks should be valued as fellow human beings even if we're not incredibly productive and prolific 🙂 valuing people only on their output under capitalism is a dangerous path.
@inherentlee @tzimmer_history
Needless to say, no intent to value ONLY for such… just a reminder that many have *no*idea of what contributions (large or small, in any domain) may be lost by arbitrarily devalueing any people. I mentioned these two because I often talked to Sophie when she attended Hot Chips over years & I was at Fellows award for Lynn Conway (and still owned Mead-Conway book).
@tzimmer_history I don’t think people understand the devastation that follows a child being denied gender-affirming care. They have never met a trans child or talked to that child’s parents. They think it’s a fad, being trans. Like it’s so much fun everyone’s doing it.
@tzimmer_history drag bans? So I have to make sure I'm dressing masculine enough to not break the law?
@tzimmer_history also, just today Marco Rubio introduced a bill to ban trans people from the military
@tzimmer_history and he's really overselling the Bostock decision's wording, which was very, very, very narrow
@parkermolloy @tzimmer_history the right has always relied on wedge issues & false pretences. Fear of scarcity. Fear of other. The right has always smashed the mechanisms of society and democracy when things started to move in the direction that addressed inequality and other problematic things such as climate change. Jan 6 terrorist attack on election proceedings. Brooks brothers terrorist arrack on election proceedings. Homestead crackdown et al. It’s a pattern.
@parkermolloy @tzimmer_history I unironically hope that one passes because making trans women register for the draft is disgusting

@tzimmer_history
all of these idiots get off on going full-on genocidal and then crying to the manager if you express an ounce of resistance

they can't be reasoned with because the power to pervert reason with their institutional megaphones is the only thing that matters to them

@tzimmer_history ... And of course it's Sullivan saying that. I've never forgiven that bastard since the days of W. and his almost literal cheerleading of the second Iraq war. Speaking of, how'd that turn out again, Andy?

@tzimmer_history I am curious as to Andrew Sullivan's qualifications to decide on appropriate medical treatment.

I'm not, really, but it's just frustrating how deliberately smug he is because he literally doesn't know enough to know why he's wrong.

If he cared, he'd read what actual medical experts say. But no, he's so certain that the medical experts are on his side that he is offended that anyone would insist that he stop and ask us!

@tzimmer_history Also, his line about children and "medicalization" is right out of old-school Scientology agit-prop, in case any journalists are interested in looking into the money funding this.

Scientology and their front group CCHR (and they create plenty of others), used very similar language in the 90s and 2000s in their attempts to pretend that ADHD and autism were "fake diseases" and even trying to pass laws and filing lawsuits to keep Ritalin and Adderall out of schools.

@tzimmer_history if a piece of shit ate another piece of shit and then defecated the piece of shit that came from that piece of shit would be Andrew Sullivan.
@tzimmer_history but isn’t Sullivan gay or something? Cant be a bigot in that case. That’s not how this works.

@tzimmer_history always has been.

His existence shoud've driven everyone from the times decades ago

@tzimmer_history I think people would be better off if they would unite their cause with disability rights. But of course disabled people are usually missing from the conversation. and there is just so much stigma towards being somebody who needs medical care that people want to pretend like it has nothing to do with the other.

@tzimmer_history trying to play like transgender rights have nothing to do with disability rights and the need to change how disability rights were written in the first place; since being transgender is cast into the same light as being a compulsive thief…

instead of considering the real effects of gender dysphoria… and the reality of treatment and what can be done…

A lot of linguistic wires were crossed in order to make healthcare denial acceptable.

@tzimmer_history

The reality that people use the word transgender to mean transsexual and to mean a person with gender dysphoria with no difference in any of these. Not all transgender people get medicalized because transgender people are wide and various and can include drag queens, butch lesbians, femgays, people with non stereotypical with their sex behavior or dress. Transsexual is a medical term which only includes those who transition to the opposite sex.

@tzimmer_history

Gender dysphoria is a medical term which can even apply to somebody who is cis Who does not feel their physical appearance is masculine or feminine enough. And they may get some work done in order to have a presentation that more aligns with their sex.

it doesn’t exclusively include transsexuals, but it does include all transsexuals. but not all who are transgender. there is a gray area of gender dysphoria because non-binary. It’s complicated.

@tzimmer_history and it becomes even more complicated when you start talking about the fact that there’s a bunch of people who don’t want to use the medical terms, and exclusively use this broader term transgender. And people who are included in being transgender who do not want to be considered transgender do to association with being transsexual. Not wanting to be associated with disability for example.
@tzimmer_history I think the medical community in particular has a lot to answer for with regards to intersex people. But geez have they not messed up with just about everyone in the mental health side of things. Especially as we discover more and more evidence of everything being something more of the domain of neurology. A field which is more respected by able-bodied people.

@tzimmer_history

I personally see a lot of wires getting crossed around the intersex movement, which is where I see everything starting from.
The human rights violations that were historically caused because of trying to force people into binary sex categories are vast.

Link to 2005 intersex human rights investigation.
https://sf-hrc.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRC_Publications/Articles/A_Human_Rights_Investigation_Into_the_Normalization_of_Intersex_People.pdf

@tzimmer_history

At least some of the harm was coming from the medical professionals. Some of the mixed messages that were gripped on and created this moral panic we are currently seeing. And none of these anti-transgender laws are addressing the real issues happening to intersex kids. They explicitly make exceptions to continue to allow it.

@tzimmer_history

It’s like… Are you reading “The Transsexual Empire”? While people are claiming that point of view is completely new? Or are we finally going to advanced to “A human rights investigation into the medical normalization of intersex people: A report of A public hearing by the human rights commission of the city of San Francisco”
A report which has many of the same sorts of players mentioned in it and is a direct debunking of an assumed argument.

@tzimmer_history

also in case you haven’t read it, and I’m a big believer in reading the opposition’s books,

https://transreads.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/2019-03-20_5c91a4ba712fd_document26.pdf

Here is a PDF for the most transphobic book of all time. Because if you don’t read it, you won’t know what you’re fighting. Make sure you read that human rights report notice the language. Very interesting isn’t it? And people just let the intersex report never be brought up.

@tzimmer_history he’s the king of “I got mine and fuck everyone else”.
@tzimmer_history Yep, elites/rich people just don’t like being called to the carpet for their ideas and opinions, and honestly, who does? But they’ve been able to avoid that for so long, it is a shock to the system. Elon Musk is a case in point. I’ve also noticed the “cancelling” is very rarely actually losing a job or opportunities, and many times, it is the opposite, so truly these articles are cynical gaslighting sometimes.
@carondolet @tzimmer_history They're afraid we'll treat them like they want to treat us.

@carondolet @tzimmer_history

Exactly! There was a joke comic of how many Netflix specials, talk-show guests, and book deals there were about how comedian X was "cancelled".

@carondolet @tzimmer_history yep. It’s only the little people who get cancelled (or more accurately dogpiled off of their online world). No rich person sees any consequence - Louis CK, Cosby, Gibson are all working and collecting accolades 🤢
@tzimmer_history I find the paradox fascinating: if all the world can hear you screech about being cancelled, have you actually been cancelled?
@Verso @tzimmer_history Yup. You've probably seen this, but it's perfect.
https://thenib.com/silenced/
Silenced! | The Nib

Cancel culture is out of control!

The Nib
@gfwellman @Verso @tzimmer_history as brilliant as Lisa Kudrow’s sketch :D https://youtu.be/t2DA1uwVsdE?t=120
Lisa Kudrow's Best Scenes In Death to 2020

YouTube
@tzimmer_history I immediately think of Tucker Carlson here.
@KansasGrant @tzimmer_history The guy that pretends to ask questions and then provides conveniently packaged “solutions”?