I don’t understand the attraction of being able to talk to computers using breezy casual conversational language; I’ve been telling these little digital bastards what to do for decades using extremely precise formalised language and they still get it wrong
Oh no this toot has gone viral, my first on Masto 🫣 If you need me I’ll be under a blanket
@TomF @sinbad I love this except that the image from Terminator 2 is so burned into my mind as Terminator 2 that it feels really out of place amongst all the Star Trek images.
@tdriley @TomF @sinbad Maybe this will help you process the joke: Picard's tea was so hot, it burned all of space-time, including the characters in Terminator.
@davidr @TomF @sinbad a cross-franchise meme, I like it. Actually the Terminator timeline has changed so many times that maybe only a Star Trek episode could be responsible?

@TomF @sinbad

Glad I wasn’t drinking any coffee when I saw these toots.

@TomF @sinbad That's why context matters. SCNR 😁
@TomF @sinbad since attribution was clipped I feel obliged to link to the author's excellent page, Dominion Media Television: https://www.facebook.com/DominionMediaTV
Log into Facebook

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Facebook
@gabrielesvelto @TomF @sinbad
If you want to provide attribution, please mention the authors of Star Trek and Terminator.
@TomF @sinbad Local variables? What are those?
@TomF @sinbad
a really powerful tea machine
@TomF @sinbad Ooh… maybe I should switch to another drink… 👀

@sinbad I feel like people visiting are always slightly disappointed in our smart-home setup.

Like they expect a conversional computer with touch displays and what we actually installed is just slightly more useful buttons.

@sinbad probably the same people who think they could casually outwit a malevolent djinn offering them 3 wishes
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@AAMfP @sinbad clearly that guy came prepared, no way was that casual 😂
@Landa @AAMfP @sinbad Does a logic class at uni in the last semester count as “coming prepared” or “casually unprepared”?
@yacc143 well, are you willing to bet your continued existence as a human instead of a mustard-filled pretzel halfway down the Challenger Deep on it? ;)
@AAMfP @sinbad I’m a big fan of the “a job well done” smile in panel 4. You earned it, comic strip person! 😂
@sinbad The extremely precise, formalized language is _exactly_ why I like computers in the first place! Yes, including the frustrations when I don’t express something in the exact way I needed to

@sinbad

I just talk to the mouse.

@sinbad Back in the early days of AI I worked with a woman who wrote a book called "Getting computers to talk like you and me" and my instant reaction was "Why the hell would we want to do that?"
@sinbad It’s the attraction of only finding out what you wanted to ask after some answer has been given.
@sinbad you just crystalized in a paragraph everything I felt since Siri was released.
@sinbad @skamille I guess there is the idea from non-technical people in position of power that it's the technical people who don't understand what they are told/ are too lazy to do it in a timely fashion and if they can just talk to the machine, things will be done just as they imagine and much faster
@sinbad This way when the computer does the wrong thing I can blame it for misunderstanding instead of myself for being bad at specifying ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@sinbad I really hope that this whole LLM / chatbot craze goes the way of NFTs soon.

I'm already having problems with websites where you can't call support directly, you have to interact with a chatbot in order to convince it that your problem is actually worthy of human assistance. If these become more prevalent it's only going to get worse.

@azonenberg It used to be, at least on older chatbot generations, that you could simply tell the bot you want to talk to a human.

@lispi314 yes but the whole point of them is to avoid paying salaries to human support staff because they cost money.

This is why phone robots etc are so hard to get around. They want you to solve your issue entirely via the robot without ever interacting with an (expensive) human.

@azonenberg I did suspect as much, but fairly often the bot is useless for anything not already documented somewhere else.

@lispi314 Yes, but apparently there's enough users who don't read the FAQs - or management thinks there are - that it's cost-effective to add all of these hoops before the actual support staff.

It's already painful enough going through level 1 support; almost any time I call a vendor it's because I tried basic troubleshooting steps and I need something that level 2 or service can provide.

Which is why I love dealing with industrial/B2B folks instead of consumer oriented companies because they tend to offer actual functional support.

@azonenberg Yeah, I feel that pain.

Tier 1 tends to always just be a repeat of the document troubleshooting steps, it's a waste of time for everyone involved.

Because the assumption is that the average user is an illiterate idiot.

@lispi314 I would love if these vendors would provide a "professional user" account tier - even if it cost a bit more - that gave you direct phone access to level 2 support.

Never gonna happen but would be awesome. Some years ago it took months of repeated calls and site visits to convince Comcast that the intermittent outages I was having were the result of a cable plant issue upstream and not something on premises.

FINALLY someone way too smart to be working in tier 1 support decided to pull logs from my neighbors' modems and noticed any time I had an outage, they did too. Sent a tech out to climb the pole and found a splice that was just friction-fit, no crimp, and would wiggle loose whenever the wind hit it right.

@azonenberg @lispi314 maybe there are a lot of people who don't read the FAQs ?
And you're not statistically representative of a user ?
@azonenberg @sinbad Give the task to your own chatbot :-)
@sinbad The nice thing about computers is that you can beat the hell out of them when they misbehave. Unlike kids and colleagues.

@sinbad Reminds me of how I encountered older/boomer/non-tech people in 90s telling me that computers will only “happen” when they have a voice interface (like Star Trek).

Of course, that doesn’t make sense because talking out loud to do your work would be very weird and distracting and prob slow. Then you realise it was because they sucked at typing and navigating the formalised interface.

@sinbad it’s like when a genie offers a wish…beware
@sinbad Before it took hours for me to craft unfathomable mistakes by misunderstanding the computer. Now IT misunderstands ME! Much more efficient!
@sinbad Learning and remembering commands is hard and boring. I think that's what it all boils down to.
@sinbad I always compare voice commands a vr interfaces to "powerpoint transitions". They are things that make you FEEL like they are supposed to make work easier the first time you learn about them or when you are not familiar with the field, but you will inevitably disable them in your work setup as soon as you have tried them for 5 minutes, because you actually accomplish tasks faster without those fancy purely aesthetic decorations.

@sinbad I actually respected that in star trek they tended to have an extremely stilted and affected manner when addressing the computer. There wasn't ambiguity, it was 'this tone/way of speaking'.

I get some minor value in being able to verbally address a computer ( not for me. Never for me. I mumble to myself all the time and want none of that shit recorded, and I don't trust companies), but the most I can see wanting is it knowing 'max' and 'maximum' are probably the same.

@sinbad Ah, memories of tabletop roleplaying games and vaguely-worded wishes.