@ConorMahood @OhNoSheTwitnt As someone who formerly wore waistcoats, those fake pockets were the BANE of me (and not just the real pockets that were lightly stitched shut for shipping, either).
My favourite waistcoat that I basically wore for 5 years straight had two pockets plus an outside breast pocket, but gods, finding it among the sea of fake pockets was a journey.
@OhNoSheTwitnt I have a freakin HOODIE with no pockets. WTF is up with that?
At least my purse is cute.
@OhNoSheTwitnt This makes me so angry that I almost exclusively wear high-end scrubs pants in defiance. SO MANY USEFULL POCKETS!!
I'm also working on figuring out how to retroactively add pockets to my skirts...
@OhNoSheTwitnt It is the most infuriating thing! *Almost* worse is when there is a pocket but it's sewn shut. Like... what???
Women's-pockets-haters should watch this fabulous video essay about them by the lovely Abby Cox
But women buy them. Or they wouldn't exist.
(NB fake pockets in men's clothing are, although rarer, not *completely* unknown.)
@TimWardCam @OhNoSheTwitnt
And then they curse the treacherous retailers when they discover the fraud. And maybe they take them back, or maybe they don't, it was so hard to find trousers that fit anyway, and retailers make returns a hassle. But getting fooled isn't a revealed preference.
I have never ONCE had an item of clothing that appeared to have pockets but did not. My clothes don't lie to me like women's clothes do. That's the patriarchy of pockets.
Glenn takes a seat while panelists discuss literal American-style pants and trousers around the world that are designed for people who identify as women—and the many styles that fail to fit many bodies! Also: missing pockets—the agents of the patriarchy never rest.