Have we really not yet standardized a “lttp:” protocol for linking to resources from The Wayback Machine? You know, a link to the past.
I fear that lots of people didn't realize that this was a joke.
@rmondello that’s kind of funny
@rmondello I’ll admit I didn’t realize that’s what you nintended
@rmondello given I’m currently working on a website migration and finding lots of dead links to other sites I had complete tunnel vision lol
@rmondello I groaned loud enough I worried about waking my housemates
@rmondello crap, I didn’t “get” it until I saw this. Genius!
@rmondello maybe it’s not a joke and you’re just brilliant
@rmondello This should be the internet’s tagline.

@rmondello I’m not sure of the context, yet it doesn’t reduce its ring of truth.

We may have found a universal status message.

@rmondello can it be a joke and also something we do anyway?😅
@rmondello
Has real "Right click, Send Link" vibes
@rmondello
But seriously, some of the best jokes have a great idea in them ☺️
@rmondello That’s why it is so good!
@rmondello I like the concept, but a few quirks that come to mind
1) how would you specify a target date for the url?
2) using a capital i or lowercase L leads to chaos — impossible for me to read IoT correctly in a sans-serif font.
@bramhill @rmondello perhaps the date could be passed as a user. lttp://[email protected]/path/to/oblivion

@chucker Given that WBM already has a date-specification syntax, with options for wildcards and (I think) date-ranging, this would be a sensible proposal.

I've been thinking for a bit now that URLs and especially domain names should have a date-specification, and that notions such as transfers, especially of personal domains, should be ... far less viable than they are now.

(Naming things is a Hard Problem, especially when it intersects with timey-wimey stuff.)

@bramhill @rmondello

@bramhill @rmondello for specifying the date, what about something akin to the format http basic auth uses: lttp://[email protected]/long_gone.html

The client could then translate the date into a request header.

@rmondello make it happen. The Internet need whimsy like this again.
@rmondello I think Jeffery Zeldaman proposed that
@rmondello And it should only allow pixelated BMP images as resources 😆. Jokes aside, I like the idea!
@rmondello @Catfish_Man I am unreasonably angry that I didn’t think of this first.

@rmondello there has been a Linux kernel module proposed for IPOT: IP Over Time:

https://perso.duckcorp.org/duck/mirrors/kadreg.free.fr/ipot/index.html

But I think it was a joke 😛

IPOT : IP Over Time

IPOT : IP Over Time

@rmondello this might be the closest thing for now:

https://github.com/richardg867/WaybackProxy

GitHub - richardg867/WaybackProxy: HTTP proxy for tunneling requests through the Internet Archive Wayback Machine

HTTP proxy for tunneling requests through the Internet Archive Wayback Machine - richardg867/WaybackProxy

GitHub

@rmondello

someone also needs to track when things disappear from the Wayback Machine.

another reason for independently mirroring them.

@rmondello (Amusingly, because companies are so garbage at keeping pages for retired products around, I've had to update a ton of links on usesthis.com to point to the Wayback Machine.)
@d I can hear this picture.
@rmondello That's not just world-class trolling, it actually makes sense. 😀
@rmondello yes this should be real!
@rmondello
Regardless of the fate of this idea, what's great is that we're thinking creatively again about the possibilities of a human-scaled internet. The spell is dissipating!

@rmondello

can we work archive.is into this somehow too

@rmondello It’s dangerous to browse alone! Take this cookie.
@rmondello you have to use an ocarina to activate the link?
@rmondello you can sort of use wayback as an http proxy if you set to https://web.archive.org/web/YYYYMMDD/
Wayback Machine

@rmondello Kudos to that bit of cleverness
@rmondello ….I kind of love this.
@rmondello if Link to the Past is it, shouldn’t it be “zelda://“? :)
@rmondello
Boooooooooooooooooooo (that's excellent)
@rmondello I applaud this wonderful wordplay
@rmondello this would actually be a pretty cool way to implement a browser extension for RFC 7089 client support
@rmondello joke or not… I like it. Why should we be constrained by the tedious and steady advance of liner time in cyberspace? That’s lame… let us become temporal Gods!