January 6 committee found that Twitter and other social media companies gave Republicans preferential treatment on social media out of fear of criticism/reprisal. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/01/17/jan6-committee-report-social-media/
What the Jan. 6 probe found out about social media, but didn’t report

The Jan. 6 committee's 845-page report offered few details of social media's role in the Capitol riot. Transcripts and an unreleased memo shows the committee knew more.

The Washington Post
This has been obvious for a very long time, and it's made the right-wing whining about "anti-conservative bias" that much more ridiculous.
And if you actually look at what "the Twitter files" show (what the actual screenshots shared by Musk's right-wing lackeys and not their biased commentary), it's mostly Twitter hemming and hawing over whether to actually enforce rules that were being broken on the regular by Republicans. That's not "anti-conservatives bias," that's preferential treatment for Republicans.
Twitter wasn't being run by out-of-control lefties. It was being run by capitalists who worried that if they enforced the rules of the platform consistently, that Republicans would throw a fit and keep dragging Jack Dorsey in front of congress to demand answers for why specific accounts get suspended.
So Twitter, which already had a pro-GOP bias in how it was managed, was then bought by a guy who sees it as his mission to eradicate "the woke mind virus" (by which he means anything vaguely liberal/different), and that's how we ended up with the complete and total cesspool its become.

@parkermolloy They learned nothing from Facebook's response to the manufactured outrage in 2016 about alleged FB editor leftist bias.

(Outrage ginned up through Gawker site Gizmodo while Peter Thiel was attacking the snot out of Nick Denton, pushing Gawker toward bankruptcy.)

@femme_mal Oh, yes, I remember the Gizmodo story that started it all. I've written about it with a fair amount of frustration in the years since.

@parkermolloy Whatever happened to Michael Nunez anyhow? He was a poor fit to cover that 2016 story; have to wonder if regular editing restraints were already gone with bankruptcy impending.

And of course Kushner's Observer pick up the story, ASAP. How fortunate for Elmo he didn't need an Observer to give his efforts a little push at a distance, he could just co-opt some horseshoe leftists.

@parkermolloy They got an unfair lift and because they don't have 100% of the pie they call it discrimination. Typical.
@parkermolloy yeah but people still use it and come up with every justification they can for patronizing the Nazi Bar and hate when you point out that they're still patronizing the Nazi Bar
@quasirealSmiths @parkermolloy agreed. All talk, no action. I quit in protest the day Musky took over. If they were really principled and outraged they would quit.
@parkermolloy the only reason Twitter is not the new truth social is because journalists, pundits, and media are still there wrapping a pretty bow around the cesspool.
@onion_amber @parkermolloy part of the problem stems from the idea that journalism cozied up so closely with Twitter. How often do you read news articles that are just a few paragraphs wrapped around a tweet? The ability to let a social embed tell half the story instead of boots on the ground journalism has basically eroded the whole publishing industry. In retrospect it was a true bargain with the devil. All their traffic is now tied to a toxic asset
@jbwharris yep! Think about how many "The internet is outraged!" stories that are just collections of random tweets exist
@parkermolloy and sports is probably the worst for this. The Twitter embeds to share highlights that they send push notifications the moment it happens to maximize eyeballs.
@onion_amber @parkermolloy how about actual official government departments & agencies? Assume they are all still on Twatter too… and that is insane. IMHO, the bird site must either become a public utility or be completely abandoned by public institutions.

@parkermolloy no idea. I left Twitter and don’t go back. Same way I don’t hang around with my old school bully.

💀Extwiticus Fucklonicus💀

@parkermolloy He thinks people who care about others have a mind virus, while he spreads idiot tier hateful right wing conspiracy theories like a spiteful greedy dumbass
@parkermolloy
I was given a “pick your own reason” of why they suspended my account! Apparently, I broke “the Twitter Rules!!”
@parkermolloy Musk claiming to not be left or right, while amplifying straight up nazis and suppressing people on the left is an example of how functionally dishonest and disconnected from reality he is
ugh he's a hot mess.

@parkermolloy I stopped being able to go on when they blocked third party apps, and I haven’t been on in a week after 15 years of nonstop scrolling and… I feel kinda good? Still crave my timeline, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I always equated twitter to smoking; I wonder if people that quit cold Turkey feel like this.

@MinPinManor @parkermolloy I quit the day Musky took over. I definitely had withdrawals, it’s taken awhile but I actually like it here better. If only there was a twitteroderm patch.

@parkermolloy Republicans are perpetual victims. No matter how far anyone goes to bend over backwards for them they will whine and cry that they are being wronged.

It never ends. There is nothing anyone can do to satisfy their crying outside of total capitulation. And even then they will just move the goalposts and start crying about something else.

@MGoCoder @parkermolloy 🎯 typical tactic of authoritarianism… simultaneously playing the strong man & the victim card.
@parkermolloy And yet, too few seem to understand that humanity learned a big lesson in this: that our data, communications, and knowledge sharing were entirely dependent on a handful of mega corporations and sometimes the whims, edicts and beliefs of the people who control them. We now have a chance to build a new infrastructure that doesn't depend on them at all. But we have to better explain the stakes before too many settle into new social media platforms The choices will affect all of us.

@shoq @parkermolloy

Eben Moglen and others have been asking people not to trade convenience for their freedoms for many years.

He warns about privately controlled social media in these talks from 2012:

Why Freedom of Thought Requires Free Media
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKOk4Y4inVY

Facebook, Google and Government Surveillance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJCczbSF-B8

#SocialMedia #surveillance #privatization

re:publica 2012 - Eben Moglen - Freedom of Thought Requires Free Media

YouTube

@wickedsmoke @parkermolloy

I'd seen it! Moglen at his best, capturing the totality of the problem before us in the new Fediverse: how to best ensure freedom of thought.

@parkermolloy "look, libsoftiktok was flagged"... yeah, with a flag that meant no matter how many times it broke twitter's rules, it required the CEO, the chief of legal and someone else to agree before any action was made. It was PROTECTED.
@parkermolloy fun how Republicans think “not immediately and without question doing our bidding” is “liberal bias”
@parkermolloy exactly. My first thought was tell us something we didn’t know. Now it’s official lol
@parkermolloy Of Course and Duh! The GOP are nothing but Domestic Terrorists!!!!!!
@parkermolloy "Out of fear of criticism/reprisal"
And that's why Western democracies capitulate to Fascism, out of Fear.
So long as we have cowards leading us the Fash will win.
@parkermolloy This is an interpretation of the Twitter files ‘revelations’ I share. Glad to have my take shared.
@parkermolloy Twitter couldn't ban nazi speech because it is indistinguishable from regular Conservative speech
@parkermolloy and that's exactly what they knew would happen. Republicans know there's no social media bias against them in the same way they know there's no election fraud. But complaining in public that there is helps them get preferential treatment. Such a scam
@parkermolloy not just twitter, this is the root cause of “both sides” in MSM
@parkermolloy social media isn’t regulated precisely because politicians can use the threat of it to push their agendas. The republicans just happen to have been screaming “liberal bias” at anything that moves for the past 20 years; they have a comparative advantage.
@parkermolloy after just a couple generations of persistent pressure, the refs start working themselves

@parkermolloy this tracks.

Success rate in reporting transphobes rocketed after Biden was sworn in.

@GellmanRebecca Sounds extremely anecdotal. I don't think it has anything to do with Biden.

@parkermolloy maybe.

But there was a definite upturn in success rate.

I commented on it at the time that twitter's policy seemed to have changed.

@parkermolloy so, the whining and gnashing of teeth on the right was all a farce?😳
@Agora always is. (Though, at this point, a lot of them believe their own nonsense. Even under Musk, I've seen a fair amount of "I'm being shadowbanned!" stuff from right-wing accounts getting massive boosts.
@parkermolloy
Weird how conservatives in the US and almost every #Republican Party elected official continues to fear a corrupt grifter. Trump must have a massive collection of dirt on #GOP. And that's who has a majority in the House?
@TopKnot @parkermolloy I find it odd that so many assume/suspect Republicans are victims/hostages to blackmail by Trump and/or Russia. While these theories are entirely possible, the reality is much simpler. RepubliCONS have simply chosen their own cushy jobs & power over their dignity & oaths of office.
Money + Power > People + Principles #GOP = #GreedOverPrinciples
@parkermolloy I was saying that for ages. All the proof you needed was the number of times those of us who called out hate speech were penalized vs those who were spewing it.
@parkermolloy You can always tell what fascists are doing by listening to what they are complaining about others doing.
@parkermolloy Oddly enough, so did Chris Wray.
@parkermolloy stuff Taiibi and Weiss will never say for $1000 Alex?
@parkermolloy
Is it 'fear of reprisals' or gutless enabling? In this instance, is there a difference? Silence = complicity.
@parkermolloy Color me shocked. How could anyone have foreseen this. LOL
@parkermolloy The new House extremists will complain that any messaging control, even that which incites violence, attacks on the Capital, Planned parenthood, on Democrat members of Congress, the CDC, election officials et al. are rights under the first amendment. However, criticism and / or peaceful protest of Congressional Republicans, Supreme Court members and BLM marches are somehow against the law and need to be dealt with harshly.. kind of like Lafayette Square. …makes perfect sense.
@parkermolloy This story gave me my Morning Rage Aneurysm, and this isn't even a thing I've been working on directly. Fucking hell it's frustrating.

@parkermolloy Once again, there's always a counter-narrative to their latest grievance, somewhere.

Debunking right wing myths, tropes and canards has been a hobby for many of us for a long time. And while's it's been the primary activity of orgs like @MMFA and other nonprofits, it still feels like something we spend far too little money on. I wish a fraction of what we spend on elections could be diverted to a few well-resourced war rooms that combat the daily Right-wing noise machine(s).