
In the last few days I've been fortunate to witness an interesting chapter in the Internet's history, and I'm trying to compile a timeline of what has happened while the memories are still reasonably fresh. This is incomplete and a work in progress; I'll be updating it, and n...
@sethcotlar Kind of strange originating from a security publication house given the amount of infosec professionals on Mastodon. Not the writer of this article but some of the contributing authors are on here.
@sethcotlar Don't ya just love it? They've never stepped a foot in this place and suddenly they know all about the majority of the content here.
And talk about projection! lol!
@sethcotlar looked at the original artivle itis writing about - no claim of a majority of content. In fact, none has been verified at all:
"This instance no doubt hosts very serious child porn content (although again, I can't verify that as there is no way in hell I am looking)."
Seems to be a UK based writer, which may be lucky for them since US law would require they report it to law enforcement or they can be held liable. But they searched for adult content and found a group they say is for pedophiles and they assume a declared support group apparently set up to kerp members from harming people must be posting porn.
https://www.secjuice.com/osint-mastodon-paedophile-csam-child-porn-problem/
It is assumed Mastodon foes not monitor the space.

In the last few days I've been fortunate to witness an interesting chapter in the Internet's history, and I'm trying to compile a timeline of what has happened while the memories are still reasonably fresh. This is incomplete and a work in progress; I'll be updating it, and n...
@sethcotlar and I want to clarify for anyone undecided reading:
Twitter's metrics are based on what they can find. Some of this is stopped automatically based on a shared database of known pictures, but new pictures need to be found manually. If they cut all but one person - as they did - they would presumably find less of it.
That means Twitter's metrics of child porn would be expected to drop substantially due to a loss in ability to detect it. The only known change is a loss of most of their team whose job was to detect it - and I think it was exactly 80% of their team suggesting the remaining member isnt finding more due to former overlap. We would expect Elon to give details if there was a reason for the drop other than a drop in the detection rate. He would brag like he did that Twitter metrics showed less.
If a third party looked and said they found less than before we could assume that it dropped since their ability to detect it was unchanged - but that isn't what happened. Twitter metrics shows less found and the shift was sudden with the only reasonable explanation being the drop in detection.
So, Elon bragged about tackling a problem anyone using critical thinking would conclude he actually made much, much worse.
@sethcotlar
I would hope that Mastodon is going to aggressively defend its brand. Human Events statements are clearly defamatory—if Mr. Musk continues to allow the account to defame his competitors, sue him too. Go after advertisers and the entities that process his $8 hollers as well. It's got to be much harder to say you're not profiting from harassment like this when you have a service contract with the offender.
50%+ is an awfully high number to prove.
@BE
Does that Human events woman really have Kramer in her banner? Quoted as if he actually knew something?