mark henick Dec 27, 2022
“Females, on average, are better than males at putting themselves in others’ shoes and imagining what the other person is thinking or feeling, suggests a new study of over 300,000 people in 57 countries.” https://neurosciencenews.com/cognitive-empathy-females-22139/

#mentalhealth #health #wellness #wellbeing #connection #cognition #social #help #psychology #psychiatry #socialwork #psychotherapy #counselling #empathy #science #research
Females on Average Perform Better Than Males on a ‘Theory of Mind’ Test Across 57 Countries - Neuroscience News

Neuroscience News provides research news for neuroscience, neurology, psychology, AI, brain science, mental health, robotics and cognitive sciences.

Neuroscience News
Show threadJ. Peter Eisenschenk

@markhenick
#hashtaggames #incontext
I took a glance at the article and didn't see how many females and how many males were in the study/poll.
I've learned to ignore study/polls and look at the science. Brain/Mind analyses would be the proof.

#pollsdonotwork

Dec 27, 2022 at 3:11amWeb
Show threadmark henick Dec 27, 2022
@JPeterE Simon Baron-Cohen’s Eyes Test isn’t a poll. It’s been shown repeatedly to have good reliability and validity in hundreds of studies. This particular meta-analysis was led out of Cambridge and published in PNAS so, while credibility is not entirely determined by authority, it’s a reasonably good filter. There’s also no such thing as proof in science
Show threadJ. Peter EisenschenkDec 27, 2022

@markhenick
It's like using statistics of an engine to guess how long your engine will last with the amount or upkeep you do. The science is taking it apart and analysing the ware and other factors for the period or use. Then they can determine with much more accuracy. I hope this helps you to understand the truth.
In Christ alway,
~ J. Peter

#truth #reality #sciencefact