Tech Journalism Doesn’t Know What to Do With Mastodon.
https://worldhistory.medium.com/tech-journalism-doesnt-know-what-to-do-with-mastodon-df1309f088a0
Tech Journalism Doesn’t Know What to Do With Mastodon.
https://worldhistory.medium.com/tech-journalism-doesnt-know-what-to-do-with-mastodon-df1309f088a0
How can we support Mastodon, as a community, so its tech stays resilient to the inevitable challenges ahead?
I morn the fate of usenet and email. oh, and RSS.
For all 3 of them news of their demise is greatly exagerrated.
@antipode77
@brewsterkahle @dave
I agree. RSS, at least, died only a death of popularity. It otherwise works as well as ever
brewster -- what a thrill to hear from you!
it's all about interop, between people and software.
if people see the benefit of USING mastodon, it could become as popular as all the tech you mention.
and personally I've been building on RSS all of this year, because i thought something like this moment was coming. ;-)
http://scripting.com/2022/12/24/162940.html
We'll know it's working if most people feel their best place to write is their blog, where the editing tools work just as they like them to, and there are no boundaries to where those ideas can be published.
Been following FOSS culture for almost 15 years. What u said was always the mantra.
During this time FB, Google and Twitter took over the world. So maybe the mantra should be changed.
The values should definitely brought up with every occasion, but strategizing based on the idea that "enough" people will choose "values over usability", is not realistic and even worse, it's self-defeating.
@dave right now, Mastodon isn't sustainable. People are losing money on it. The donation situation won't last and frankly i don't think it's fair.
I read familiarities in the post, but I also think it misses the mark. There is just less to write about, which isn't something uncomfortable, there is just fewer information value. And frankly a lot is written about Mastodon, although lots of parroting, as usual.
Mastodon isn't done inventing itself, which is good. Means we re-witness inception.
@cedricdes @dave running it securely and staying current with patches will be an issue. Regardless, people need to maintain and pay the electricity bill.
Operational effort often scales pretty well. Few large is much more efficient over many small. Especially here with Mastodon due to how the content moves around.
I think we'll end up seeing a small group of large Mastodon clusters, with a premium model to pay the specialists keeping it all safe.
But the there is are still the legal issues.
@sergi @dave it still costs money and without compensation the entire network is losing money and therefore is unsustainable.
Either it needs to be (state-) funded (without influence, thats virtually undoable), or should have a premium tier that also compensates for free accounts (a bit what @protonvpn does).
As long as instances are run mostly on goodwill, it'll be fragile.
@dave I have a bias, but I have not seen much of this:
>> Gotta love tech journalists who describe Mastodon as “that impossible-to-use website.”
There were a few stories like that in early November maybe, but that’s not the impression I’ve gotten since from mainstream news orgs.
That seems like a bit of a strawman.
@dave
For those who want more of the story