If you're hearing a lot about the fediverse these days, you should know: Mastodon is not the whole fediverse and the fediverse is not simply a Twitter replacement. The fediverse is an entire ecosystem, built on something called ActivityPub. Learn more: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/11/leaving-twitters-walled-garden
Leaving Twitter's Walled Garden

This post is part of a series on Mastodon and the fediverse. We also have a post on privacy and security on Mastodon, why the fediverse will be great—if we don't screw it up, and how to make a Mastodon account. You can follow EFF on Mastodon here.A wave of people have announced that they're leaving...

Electronic Frontier Foundation
@eff seriously appreciate this series!

@eff ironic that your webpages don't have a "share on mastodon" button but do have share buttons for two such walled gardens.

will you be adding a  button soon?

@eff This was the best explainer I've seen yet. Thanks for putting it out there.

@eff

This guy seems to have good info too.
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRQQh2uB/

endeavorance on TikTok

Hello yes it is me: an Internet Boy. Here’s some words about a bad website. #socialmedia #internet #technology

TikTok
@eff Distributed moderation. Let Clarence Thomas try to declare every instance a public forum, one at a time, when he disagrees with their speech.
@eff I see a lot of people use the word platform to describe Mastodon. I feel like your term of ecosystem is better fitting.
@eff Are y'all planning to move to another instance at any point? I'm seeing a lot of them saying they'll be defederating from mastodon.social soon.

@eff pretty sure a nontrivial number of folks don't even know that Mastodon the instance and Mastodon the service are two different things ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

The Web 2.0 takeover by centralized corporate services have severely stunted people's horizons to the point that things like the fediverse are now fundamentally foreign concepts.

@HunterZ tell them it's like email with a social media skin for your preferred style of interaction.
@MissingANNo the sad fact is that email is also pretty much centralized now too

@eff I found this a bit confusing. It says that you can following people on different instances and they can follow you, but then also says you might pick your instance based on a common interest. I think that could use some additional clarification as to what benefit you get from being on the same instance as those with whom you share a common instance, if it’s not the ability to read their posts.

Is it that your instance’s feed acts like a curated list of content relevant to that interest?

@captbaritone @eff I also found it confusing, the instance has more to do with the security of the account's data than with the matter at the end of the day. Federated networks are not walled gardens. The instance is also a way to micro manage issues related to user posts.
@Jordan Eldredge Let's suppose you're a musician. And you want to connect with other musicians.

If you pick any one random instance, you'll have to find musicians all over the Fediverse by searching for hashtags.

If you pick an instance for musicians with lots of musicians on it, you'll have a local timeline chock-full of toots from musicians. And you'll probably also have a higher musician density on the federated timeline because the musicians on this instance are likely to connect with musicians elsewhere in the Fediverse or boost music-related toots from elsewhere in the Fediverse.

@jupiter_rowland Mastodon supports lists. Is it only private lists? Is it possible to maintain a list which is public? The "local timeline as a list of posts my musicians" use case seems odd to me. Why conflate instance selection (which includes moderation/privacy/hosting) concerns) with curation?

Seems like it might be preferable to decouple these things.

(Just thinking aloud)

@Jordan Eldredge AFAIK, the lists are private. They serve one particular purpose: You can choose to read toots from only a subset of those whom you follow. Other projects have something similar with the extra bonus of being able to choose to send a message to only those on a particular list. I think the aspects on Diaspora* have this, I know that the privacy groups on Friendica and Hubzilla have this.

Choosing a particular Mastodon instance isn't anything like curating a list. It's more like a permanent virtual meeting-point, like, to stay with the musicians example, a pub where musicians meet and chat and socialise, just without concerts or jam sessions. You know from somewhere that this particular pub is a popular hangout for musicians, and you're a musician yourself, so you go there to meet other musicians.

Think of the local timeline as a table where a bunch of musicians are already sitting and chatting.

Of course, you may decouple them. You may even set up your own single-user instance and rely on hashtags to a) find like-minded people and b) be found by like-minded people in return. But that'd defeat the purpose of themed instances.

And there aren't only instances based on interests (just look at all the furry instances or all the manga/anime instances), but there are also instances based on physical location. For example, even some German cities have their own, albeit unofficial, instances. If you live there, you can join that particular instance and meet other people living in the same city more easily because you can count on the vast majority of users on that particular instance living in that city, too. Of course, you don't have to do that if you prefer to keep secret where you live.

Another advantage is that people having something in common sharing an instance themed with what they have in common have a kind of safe haven. The grid owner is one of them, and if there are moderators, these moderators are of their own kind, too. Instance policies are likely to be adapted to the theme so that fending off haters is easier and more efficient.

This is not only of importance for certain fringe hobbies/interests (especially the furry fandom; on furry instances, the owner and founder is a furry, and all mods are furries), but also for oppressed minorities like BIPOC or LGBTQIA+. You can be sure that the moderation on an instance run by and for BlackTwitter refugees is much faster and more eager to fend off aggressive racists than on a general instance.
@eff excellent information! Many thanks EFF!
@eff @KimCrayton1 - hi Kim. I saw your question earlier on the fediverse. Thought this might also help you. I really trust EFF as a sources
@auroria @eff thanks…I’ve bookmarked ✊🏾💛
@eff thanks for this explainer. One issue I’ve been thinking about is the difficulty for average users ability to discover the best instance to join. Most will likely just follow the herd which leads to bigger instances that may not necessarily be better. Then there is the issue of trust that the instance will be managed well over time (with no standards for transparency/accountability this may not be the case). I know one can move but then the problem becomes discovery again…
@eff the result is that some users will seek to create their own server/instances where they can manage things themselves and other users will end up in what they deem to be “safe communities” that may not be truly safe in some cases (I’m thinking of a state setting up instances to attract and track opinions as one example). I think better mechanisms for transparency, accountability and discoverability are going to be needed to allow the #fediverse to grow and thrive long term.
@eff YES! AN ARTICLE THAT GETS IT RIGHT! I LOVE YOU EFF
@eff unless it is biologically alive, it is not an ecosystem. Perhaps it is an environment or network?
@eff Great post - I didn't see a link within it to https://fediverse.party/ though, which provides direct access to many of the other #Fediverse social media platforms that lend themselves to other types of content.
- Fediverse.Party - explore federated networks

Let's make social media free, federated and fun! Fediverse.Party is your guide into the world of decentralized, autonomous networks running on free open software on a myriad of servers across the world. No ads and no algorithms. Join Fediverse and become part of the new interconnected Web!

@eff You post this, and latter make a post like Mastodon is the only #microblogging service on the Fediverse…😥 What about #Calckey & #Misskey?
@eff ​:foundkey:​

@eff
And that is just a start. Consider beyond fediverse – a more richly distributed infrastructure - hybrid, multi-dimensional “pluriverse.”

A New, Broader Case for Social Media Agent "Middleware" to restore human context.
Foundation for 3 pillars that synergize to counter issues w/ each:
1. individual agency
2. social mediation ecosystem
3. reputation.
https://ucm.teleshuttle.com/2023/11/a-new-broader-more-fundamental-case-for.html,
+ related pieces: https://ucm.teleshuttle.com/p/items.html

A New, Broader, More Fundamental Case for Social Media Agent "Middleware" (Revised)

(Post and deck  restructured , expanded 1/7/24, as noted below.) Despite the efforts of  business,  government,  and  academia, there seems ...

@eff Would love to follow the EFF on #nostr. It's decentralized like ActivityPub/Mastodon, but your identity is not tied to your instance. It's much more censorship resistant and has built-in tipping which could be a valuable fundraising tool for EFF.