In Texas an Sri Lanken-American named Rajan Moonsinghe got a gun to protect his home. Suspecting a burglar he stood on his front porch. Cops arrived unannounced & shot him dead in less than 1 sec. And the NRA is silent. This is a trend.

Before Rajan, when cops killed Tamir Rice for a toy gun in an open carry state—NRA was 🤐. When cops killed legal gun owner Philando Castille, NRA was 🤐. But when Rittenhouse killed 2 people, NRA called him " a warrior for gun owners!”

2A doesn't apply to BIPOC.

@QasimRashid Police Refuckingform‼️‼️
@Kitchi @QasimRashid Defund and abolish, they will never reform.

@SocialistStan @Kitchi @QasimRashid

Unfortunately society needs people to (police).enforce the law. What we don't need are police unions that blackmail communities to keep cops from legitimate accountability.

@joedamiani @Kitchi @QasimRashid "Law and order" is a fascist ideology.
@SocialistStan OK Stan. ExplIn.

@joedamiani Law implies some decision imposed on a population by a lawgiver, and law enforcement are the boots on the ground that keep people in line with it through violence, the fear of which creates the order in society that the lawgiver wants.

If you glorify "law and order" you're glorifying the imposition of a lawgiver's will on a population through violence, and implicitly saying that their 'order' is superior to any the people would have chosen for themselves.

@SocialistStan interesting. What is your alternative? Anarchy maybe?

@joedamiani Yes, I'm an anarchist. An-Archos, no rulers.

An anarchist conception of 'law' is very different than what the police do. It relies on the principle of free association as a basis, meaning that no body is born into the dominion of a legal system and people are free to choose communities with norms that match their own. The need for enforcement of those norms is minimal when people have self-selected to follow them.

Kinda the way this platform works.

@SocialistStan @joedamiani
Joe, city states went out of style in about 5BC.
If you don’t want to live in society, move off the grid, in a forrest somewhere.
@PensiveTM @joedamiani Not at all, in fact city states have never been a more viable option. New York alone for example has the GDP and armed forces of a small country.
@SocialistStan
You’ll want to remove the Socialist from your username, since as an extreme Libertarian, you are anything but.
@PensiveTM I'm a libertarian socialist (real libertarian). Do you want to talk about the viability of city states, or just defend nationalism?
@SocialistStan
Federalism, not nationalism.
There should be one set of laws for a country, not different laws for every state, or county.
Take Bristol VA/TN. You can have 4 pot plants on one side of the street and be out in prison for a gram across the street.
Laws shouldn’t be different because you cross an imaginary line.
If you want to be rid of laws, remove the demand of wage slavery to exist. If everyone has their needs met, then there would be no need for crime, or laws.

@PensiveTM

Getting rid of wage slavery would definitely go a very very long way to reducing the incentive for people to prey on one another.

If you're ok with different laws for each country, why not for each county or city? That's just an arbitrary line intended to keep nationalist formations intact, federated or not. You seem to be arguing that laws would be unnecessary (or less necessary) under socialism, but also that there should be one set of laws imposed?

@PensiveTM A diversity of 'laws' is just as important as diversity in anything else. Why should people live under a legal system they haven't consented to?

And if they have consented to it, then it's not really a legal system in the proper sense of the word imo.

@SocialistStan
If you are born in the US, then US laws apply to you.
I just believe there should be no state laws, especially ones that break the supremacy clause of the Constitution.
We are never going to agree here.
I would suggest walking from Tennessee to Virginia by crossing Main St. and see what real freedom looks like.

The below is illegal by most state laws. But not for me.

@PensiveTM So you believe there should be no state laws (even though you espoused federalism earlier), that people should be born into systems they can't consent to, and a document written by 18th century slave-owners is what that system should be based on?

Yah, we are never going to agree, you're an authoritarian nationalist.

BTW, if you had your way that pot would be illegal.

@SocialistStan
Ok Buh bye. I do not suffer idiots very well. #Muted

@PensiveTM You might be interested to know that globally significant cities are organized into networks that act unilaterally.
https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/

Not too different from the Hansiatic League, which was a network of city states in the 14th century (not 5BCE)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanseatic_League

This isn't to say city states can't be authoritarian internally, but they are certainly viable.

Home - Global Covenant of Mayors

Global Covenant of Mayors
Constitutional Sheriffs

The origins of constitutional sheriff ideology lie in the two concepts of the county supremacy movement: The county – not the state or federal governments – should control all land within its borders, and the county sheriff should be the ultimate law enforcement authority in the U.S. These ideas were pioneered by Christian Identity minister William Potter Gale in the 1970s and described as “Posse Comitatus.”

Southern Poverty Law Center
@PensiveTM Law enforcement exists only where there is a law to be enforced, you seem to want a single law imposed on everyone.
@PensiveTM @SocialistStan Got me mixed up with someone else. I've said nothing about city states.

@joedamiani Anarchist 'legal theory' (quotes cause it's not really the same thing as what a government imposes) also debates between actions which are malum in se and malum prohibitum.

The first kind of action is one which is wrong in itself, like racism or murder, the second category are actions which are wrong only because someone has agreed under principles of free association that they are, like a Muslim eating pork.

@joedamiani

If you begin analyzing the 45K+ laws that exist in the US you will find the vast majority are just some old dead guy's opinion on what should be wrong imposed on everyone else. Only a handful deal with malum in se matters.

But the pigs will kill you over any of them. so #AbolishThePolice

@SocialistStan @QasimRashid Absolutely I include that in police reform.
@QasimRashid True. Most rights, laws & policies are applied quite differently for POC. To the detriment of the person of color.
@SearinglyAaron @QasimRashid To the detriment of all of us. I think we'd all be safer if truly dangerous trigger-happy people like Kyle Rittenhouse were behind bars.
@nandor @QasimRashid fair point. Just seems POC have the even worse treatment & outcomes.
@SearinglyAaron @QasimRashid Oh they *absolutely* get treated worse than the rest of us! But part of the situation that many rich/white/male/straight R voters don't get is that racist actions like this are a detriment to *their* lives as well. They just don't realize it (which is why they often continue to turn a blind eye to racist policies and actions).
@SearinglyAaron @QasimRashid In 1975 Toni Morrison said "The function, the very serious function of racism is distraction." In this case, it distracts R voters from the fact that the policies they vote for harm them deeply, for the benefit of the very, very rich and powerful.
@nandor @QasimRashid one answer as to why so many people vote against their interests
@QasimRashid
I'm outside of the USA and so many things I hear are just inconcievable. How can a society bear such blatant injustice?

@Simone21 @QasimRashid

I don’t know. A large part of the people in this country aren’t entirely civilized. The left/Dems keep trying but the mechanisms of change are ridiculously slow. It’s extremely frustrating.

@jldg @QasimRashid
I don't know either.
It just makes me so sad to watch it.
And, after January 6th, it also evokes sorrow and fear.
@QasimRashid Yet, when a white man shoots people in a school, church, synagogue, club, or store, the police usually take him alive. Double standard much?

@QasimRashid

NRA has a long history of hypocrisy on the gun rights of BIPOC. They supported gun control laws in California when Black people started arming themselves.

https://www.history.com/news/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

The NRA Supported Gun Control When the Black Panthers Had the Weapons

Back in the 1960s, even the NRA supported gun control to disarm the group.

HISTORY
@QasimRashid hypocrisy rears its ugly head at the NRA. One of my favorite "fake" commercials was one where a black man shows up with his guns and is standing next to 2 white guys. He is all in on the NRA concept of having guns in society, and the 2 white guys are a little squeamish to say the least. Point made.

@QasimRashid Of course not. Even Reagan shut down gun ownership when Af-Am men started to carry long guns in public.

https://www.history.com/news/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

Want to get better gun control? Make sure every BiPOC and minority accumulate guns. Big ones. Not Sat Nite pea shooters. They'll shut it down in a hurry.

The NRA Supported Gun Control When the Black Panthers Had the Weapons

Back in the 1960s, even the NRA supported gun control to disarm the group.

HISTORY
@QasimRashid
The first ban on assault weapons came when Republicans feared that too many guns would end up in the hands of BIPOC individuals
@QasimRashid 2A and "religious freedom" are nothing but tools of white supremacy. Which is why so-called conservatives will NEVER do anything to reduce the power these things give them. It would serve us well to understand this and stop being surprised that even a mass murder of children doesn't make them budge. It is about white, straight, patriarchal power and will be until we all come together to take that power away from them (through elections). They WILL NOT ever give it up willingly.
@QasimRashid Not to mention, Aaron Dean ( a Fort Worth cop) shot Atatiana Jefferson dead in her home three years ago. His reason: because she had a gun in her hand. She was home babysitting her eight year old nephew when police responded to a "wellness call" because her door was ajar. She grabbed her firearm after hearing someone (the cops) prowling around the home in the dark. To your point: she was killed because she dared to protect herself and her nephew in their home.
@QasimRashid every time a cop does this, his pension should go to the victim’s family. A little financial incentive might get these creeps to engage brain before they shoot
@QasimRashid NRA is a white nationalist terrorist organization
@QasimRashid Christ, it’s endless. It’s disgusting.
@QasimRashid The Holy 2nd Amendment is not for *those* people.

@QasimRashid

So the NRA thinks the second amendment, 'the right to bear arms' is only meant to apply to certain members of society?
Where does it say that?

@QasimRashid this is absolutely infuriating.

@QasimRashid Believe it or not, there's probably a lot less racial/ethnic bias in this data than seems at first. The truth is actually worse: NRA does not care about ANYONE with a gun. It's the GUNS themselves they care about -- more specifically, the ability to BUY them. Everything they do is about that, not about any people or rights. NRA is an industry lobby.

The reason they care about Rittenhouse is that his case threatened gun sales, because he was the perpetrator, rather than a victim.

@QasimRashid There is something called The LIberal Gun club that is literally a gun club for liberals and it opposes the NRA...
@QasimRashid Cops have seen too many cop movies or taken too many steroids but somehow too many ofthem have lost their judgement.
@JohnShirley2023 @[email protected]
There are never any consequences for their behavior. Police unions are to normal unions what cancer is to healthy tissue.
@QasimRashid
I Saw that story, the grief stricken mother trying to talk on the News, just broke my heart.💔
@QasimRashid Guess it depends on the numbers.
@QasimRashid BIPOC need their own version of the NRA, the NRA as it exists is for white magas only.