First of all we thank you for your response to the presence of the Memorial in the #Fediverse. Thank you for amplifying our voice.

One of the issues raised was using the CW option. We use it with disturbing images, but...

It is challenging, but should all history of #Auschwitz be a CW? Most of our posts remind people, victims of the camp. We show their names, faces, individuality & commemorate them on their birthdays. Marking them with a CW seems somehow wrong.

What do you think?

@auschwitzmuseum yes don’t make them CW, not the faces.
@auschwitzmuseum I agree with you.
Having been a fervent follower on the bird site for years now, it’s the people story’s (faces and dates) that are the most powerful.
@auschwitzmuseum I agree with your current approach. Use it for disturbing images but not the portraits of people. They are people like you and me, that is the important point.
@auschwitzmuseum Don't think it should be marked CW

@netshrink @auschwitzmuseum

I do wonder if hashtags could be used, making a distinction between the "civilian" pictures, the "inmate" pictures, and pictures of events. It's all part of what replaces algorithms on commercial social media.

@auschwitzmuseum Only disturbing images need a CW.
@auschwitzmuseum I don't think it's needed for the pictures of prisoners, or the general history of the camp. Pictures of bodies should be CW'd, in my opinion.
@auschwitzmuseum Giving names and faces to the victims is one of the most important things you do, so I would be against CW'ing those pictures.
@auschwitzmuseum I see no need of a content warning for the pictures that are just the faces of the victims.
@auschwitzmuseum
Reminding us of the cruelty of Nazism should not be CW.
@auschwitzmuseum the faces and names must be shown. It's only by being daily reminded of humanity can the loss be remembered properly. Otherwise it just becomes numbers and that's not right.

@auschwitzmuseum On the one hand, yes, posts can be disturbing and as such fit the guidelines for use of CW.

On the other, now more than ever, we all need to remember.

I’d vote “no” to a CW, although I expect others would disagree.

@auschwitzmuseum I haven't seen any of your content so far (twitter included) that requires "content warning".
@auschwitzmuseum this is a good example of where CWs should be few. We must learn, and we must never forget.
@auschwitzmuseum I'm glad to have found you here & will continue to follow your posts. I don't think a content warning is necessary for most posts which are simply pictures of the people as they were in their youth and their camp photograph - those pictures are horrid but straightforward. There's more CW about the text, and when we follow you, it should be clear enough what the content is likely to be. Perhaps a CW on the pictures such as the terribly emaciated prisoners shown recently?
@auschwitzmuseum I think it depends on the culture of your server and the culture of your audience. Personally, I think your approach sounds respectful and sensible.

@auschwitzmuseum I also think it's wrong. Please go on 🤍

If people explicitly don't want to be confronted with your Toots they can personally mute the account.

@[email protected] I can't speak for all instance admins, but in this circumstances, I don't plan on using CW for anything coming from the memorial. I think it's far too important of an issue and mission to shield behind a CW.

@auschwitzmuseum

I honestly think that none of your posts should have a CW attached. Reality insists that we note and mark every single one of the people who perished in the camps. Others have the option not to follow you. I follow you and will bear witness.

It's an imperative.

I personally follow you because of what you do, I think if you were a 'normal account' where you might see a wide variety of topics, CWs would be more appropriate for your content. However your stated objective of the account are these memorials, so IMO i don't think you would need CW
@auschwitzmuseum don't CW the faces. These people need to be seen as they were, remembered for who they were and what they stood for.
With more disturbing images, CW all the way. But I don't believe people you are remembering by sharing about them, should be hidden.
Just my opinion of course. I hope you get many replies to it will be easier to decide the right thing for your posts.
Keep up the good work. 🕯
@auschwitzmuseum I think the CW should be considered when the content could offend someone. However, your posts are intended to educate and show a tragic history (which was, ironically, at least partly hidden when it was happening). However shocking we need to face up to the past and learn from it. In short, I think context matters when it comes to CWs.
@auschwitzmuseum I think you shouldn't use CWs for most of your posts. One thing you could experiment with is writing short posts here that don't contain disturbing information about what happened to them, and linking to the full article on your website where the entire story is explained. Mastodon is more flexible than Twitter. Here there's no algorithm penalizing posts that link to external websites.
@auschwitzmuseum
I agree,,your posts should not be CW by default. It is history and humanity.
@auschwitzmuseum I fully agree with your current approach.
@auschwitzmuseum No, it should not have a CW. From all triggers, we should bot avoid this one, because your work is to remember us, why we are here. Why we left the Birdsite, why we fear an old narcisstic man on the other side of an ocean. Remember us. Without a courtain.
@auschwitzmuseum if they are people looking at the camera then CW for eye-contact is a kind thing to do for autistic & other neurodivergent neighbours.
You may also get more boosts as some people follow this courtesy for boosting to their own followers
@auschwitzmuseum You absolutely do not have to use CW.
@auschwitzmuseum The history of Auschwitz should not be a CW, I think.
@auschwitzmuseum I believe your approach is good: there is no need to CW a portrait; on more sensitive immagies, the warning is an educated thing to do. Also, you the best ❤️
@auschwitzmuseum names and faces should not be hidden, people can personally choose to filter out posts from the museum if they so wish.
@auschwitzmuseum We should be able to see the faces of those murdered by the nazis without CW.
@auschwitzmuseum I agree, I don’t think your posts need CW, they are people not disturbing images.
@auschwitzmuseum Carry on. Remembering isn’t always pleasant. Use CW sparsely and when appropriate, I’m sure you’ll know when

@auschwitzmuseum talk to the admin of mastodon.world. That's the easiest way to avoid any further discussions about it.

I don’t see any problem with the posts as they are.

@auschwitzmuseum Mostly, your toots don’t need to be behind a content warning. People still have the mute option available if they want to opt out for a while. #contentwarnings
@dave_port @auschwitzmuseum I agree with Dave. If there are folks for whom they cannot handle your content they can mute your account.
@auschwitzmuseum Agree with you. Please do not cover them with a CW.
@auschwitzmuseum IMHO, please don't. Your profile could have CW info for unfamiliar users. But everyone who follows you, have decided to never forget.

@auschwitzmuseum

People need to be seen and remembered. Please continue as you have started. Protect those who need it from disturbing images, but full visibility for the faces and stories.

@auschwitzmuseum Your pictures make the victims visible. Pls. continue continue the way you started.
@auschwitzmuseum I think that if someone chooses to follow you, they're aware they'll be exposed to non-graphic information. I think you're currently handling things well.
@auschwitzmuseum I'd be tempted to agree with you, that hiding it away feels wrong and if you've followed then you would expect it.
But, if people boost you, as you would want, that means people who were not expecting it getting potentially (and understandably) upsetting information turning up.
So, yeh, it's difficult and this wasn't helpful. Sorry.
@auschwitzmuseum I think the solemn nature of memorializing the victims as well as the nature of Mastodon having to follow to see posts means every user can assume the whole page is a content warning if they find the faces of the victims to be triggering. Maybe put CW in bio?
@auschwitzmuseum I think it is enough to mark posts with disturbing images CW.
@auschwitzmuseum only very disruptive image should get CW
@auschwitzmuseum
have to agree with you, CW seems wrong
#NeverForget

@auschwitzmuseum you should never hide people, people lost to us because of some horrible murderous ideology

Hiding them is almost blocking them, as the Nazis tried to

Please don’t. You have the balance right

And please keep spreading the message #NeverAgain

@auschwitzmuseum they need to be posted without, its a confronting history that we can't forget. Please don't hide any of that upsetting as it is. Thank you.
@auschwitzmuseum Go on the was you started. Hiding their faces seems wrong to me.
@[email protected], folks who find CWs annoying can just check the "Always expand posts marked with content warnings"-box. So go for it, if you think you should.
@auschwitzmuseum no CW anche per me! Grazie per quello che fate in memoria delle vittime dell'olocausto ❤️

@auschwitzmuseum

I think your current approach is good.

Most of me thinks people shouldn't be allowed to look away even from the most graphic images, although I know this attitude may be counterproductive to actually educating people and changing minds.

@auschwitzmuseum Of course no CW! Anyone has the option not to look at your posts, which remind everyone who wants it about what happened.
@auschwitzmuseum Don’t hide the beautiful humans who were ruthlessly killed. Back on the bird site I always stopped whenever your posts came up, to SEE and acknowledge the person, learn about them and send a little prayer.