@Sheril To be a little more fair to pollsters, I think people just expect too much from them. If the chance of drawing a ♣️,♠️, or ♥️ from a randomized deck is 75%, I shouldn't call that probability unreliable if I draw a ♦️.
A better way to put it might be, polls are just probabilities. You can still win the game if you play hard enough!
Stats may tell you who *should* win the football game, but we still play the game to see who wins. Polls and elections are no different.
@Sheril Unless you know the method and sample a poll can be made to prove anything.
Vote!
Probability indeed, perhaps polls can be useful as an instrument of measuring if-- or how rigged the elections were. But of course we'll only know this after the event.
Infrequent voters and non-voters, if you don't vote, you don't matter to those who end up in office.
@Sheril Aside from internal polling, polling has very little actual utility.
It is for people to go to a fortune teller but pretend they aren’t doing that.
Nate Silver BTW thinks he has a System™ that can pick winners even if the horses are doped and the jockeys are cheaters. He recently said so (on Twitter), just in different words.