@Hamishcampbell
While I agree with your quote, we have very different ideas about both what ideology is and how it works, as well as what are right and left wing agendas.
Ideology is "your social being determines your consciousness".
The left wing agenda to me is "get rid of capitalism".
@bob
I agree with you and Weisenbaum, too.
Altho I do run into enough people in computing projects who are anti-capitalist and want to do something about it that something might happen...
@bhaugen @bob I short circuit the pointless of much thinking by defining the terms #KISS with a tech focus.
Left is open/trust
Right is control/fear
Its pointless to build on compexerty as we live in a "post truth" world powered by #techchurn motivated by #fashernist
With out this #KISS short we go nowhere, kinda like the last few years. Let's build "social truth" or worship the #deathcult the second is "common sense" the first needs a shoval #OMN
I was disagreeing with your explicitly stated definitions of Left and Right and also by inference from those, what you think ideology is and how it works, since you often mention ideology in those terms, and did so in the toot I replied to.
I am sure that your thinking is wider than those short definitions.
What do you think I am disagreeing with that you are not saying?
I short circuit the pointless of much thinking by defining the terms #KISS with a tech focus.
Left is open/trust
Right is control/fear
Its pointless to build on compexerty.
Yep, you would be right, complexity is here, for example much of the history of #mainstreaming 20th century left is rightwing as it's based on fear/control, think Stalin or the British Labour party.
Early web #mainstreaming it's clearly built on open/trust etc.
@bhaugen @bob are we building a bridge or tearing down a bridge here. In the "post truth" world building foundations is a revolutionary act #4opens #OGB #OMN #indymediaback #PGA
Tell me about the bridge you are building, were it comes from, were it goes, what are the foundation stones that support it.
Ps. A bridge with our people is just a pile of rocks.
@Hamishcampbell
I agree with everything @bob wrote.
For myself, I am not sure what you mean by bridges. You wrote "a pile of rocks". I got a few of those.
Concretely, what I am focusing on these days is https://www.valueflo.ws/
It's a vocabulary for distributed independent systems to internetwork economically, as in the fediverse. Aimed at #interoperability
So far, in the fediverse, implemented by @bonfire and @bob says they are implementing http://www.datafoodconsortium.org/ which is related.
@bhaugen @bob @bonfire @bob your project is a bridge, it gets (open) data from one place to another.
Its not the approach I would choice as a main flow but it's as valid and usefull for meany people so as far as it's #4open I support it, looks good, would you say bronze, silver or gold https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/4opens/wiki
However, remember that the ActivityPub standard grew the fediverse quite a lot, and I see you advocating more standarization. Or did I misunderstand?
The formal aproch and the chaotic aproch can feed each other if the code is standardised to bridge the gap.
We have the hiracys built into bridge to more formal structure you just flow the formal data into the base foksonermy. Both aorproches work and have value.
As long as we share a common #4opens standards in place to bridge.
People choice were value is added and how value is found
@Hamishcampbell
Might even work!
@bhaugen @bob @bonfire @bob if we can start by bridgeing the #geekproblem to get both approaches implement with a common standard to pass data to each.
This is the big IF am talking about, the only bridge that has actually worked in the last 10 years was mastodon implementation of #Activertypub and the white lies that got people to use it.
Closed is still king.