@info ... The previous owner would change the repository signatories to add the new modifier in, who can then make an official, fully signed-off release.

This way the project has a life of its own, fully embracing the #4open philosophy; it is not tied down to any forge.

@letsencrypt have you thought that having all the #openwebs security going through one org might be a fail.

#4open #KISS big/small picture thinking issue.

@bhaugen @bob @bonfire @bob

That's cheating ;) the is #kiss structure to the #4open is your project bronze, silver or gold let's add some metadata :)

@bhaugen @bob @bonfire @bob your project is a bridge, it gets (open) data from one place to another.

Its not the approach I would choice as a main flow but it's as valid and usefull for meany people so as far as it's #4open I support it, looks good, would you say bronze, silver or gold https://unite.openworlds.info/Open-Media-Network/4opens/wiki

@strypey @Indymedia @clacke this is pritty much how i see the #OMN project working. But clearly not how the #indymedia network can work.

As long as projects are #4open the is no reason not to have a happy diversity of stratagys in a wider network. The problem is when each of these go in different incombatable ways and create parrel networks, a all to common problem. The #OMN approach is designed to mediate this problem.