What helps people understand conversational cues?
Correctly identifying implications correlated not just with "theory of mind", but also reflective and logical reasoning. Short-term memory? Not so much.
What helps people understand conversational cues?
Correctly identifying implications correlated not just with "theory of mind", but also reflective and logical reasoning. Short-term memory? Not so much.
How can researchers overcome #AcquiescenceBias?
In a #questionnaire, acquiescence is a tendency to agree with statements or answer affirmatively regardless of survey content.
Alvarado-Leiton et al. report simple ways to mitigate it.
"a movement that is blurring the lines between philosophy and psychology. This new approach, called experimental philosophy, aims to apply the practical tools and findings of the cognitive sciences to philosophical problems"
https://thenewjournalatyale.com/2012/04/we-started-the-fire/
https://vimeo.com/showcase/8267237?video=1167686450
"Ethics in the Lab: Experimental
Philosophy between Is and Ought"
by https://www.philosophie.uzh.ch/de/seminar/people/research/snf_willemsen/willemsen.html

Can we assume research participants accept the stipulations of vignettes?
This paper reports that moral dilemma decisions varied according to how much people seemed to believe stipulations (e.g., that intervening would actually save five people).
Do neuroscientists' claims about #freeWill impact students' #ethics?
A "deterministic passage ...from Crick" sometimes reduced decisions to proactively intervene in moral thought experiments compared to a "neutral #neuroscience text".