Well, the Veneras also measured wind, and Venera 14's site was less windy. Here is a paper by our old pal Leonid Ksanfomality:
Ksanfomaliti, L.V. et al., 1982. Microseisms at the VENERA-13 and VENERA-14 Landing Sites. Soviet Astronomy Letters, vol. 8, July-Aug. 1982, p. 241-242.
See it here:
https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1982SvAL....8..241K
But much longer-lived instruments will be needed. Sensors in the atmosphere (on balloons) are being looked at, they might detect seismic waves.
#venus #venera14
This is the central part of the map at larger scale.
Venus #venera14
The upper view from yesterday shows the arm which fell onto the surface to test surface hardness - we saw it with Venera 13 too - but here it fell on the camera cover and didn't tell us anything useful. But check the foreground of each view, the lander base ring with its teeth - designed to reduce turbulence during descent, I think. If you view this image:
http://mentallandscape.com/C_Venera14_1.jpg
you see the full set of Venera 14 images (sadly, very low resolution). They tell a story...
#venus #venera14
What did Venera 14 see in this volcanic landscape? Again we will check in with Don Mitchell:
http://mentallandscape.com/C_CatalogVenus.htm
- look half way down the page. Both cameras worked again, both provided some colour data (most of one pan, a bit of the other). My image is something I scanned in Moscow, showing map-projected versions of the central parts of the two panoramas, on opposite sides of the lander. These are presumably thin lava flows or cemented ash layers.
#venus #venera14