Lime carried record 57,000 trips the day of the Seahawks parade, on par with daily traffic over the Aurora Bridge

Lime riders took more than 57,000 trips February 11, the day of the Seahawks parade downtown. After adding Bird’s 2,100 rides, the 59,300 total of shared bike and scooter rides was on par with the average daily traffic across the Aurora Bridge.

The only pieces of roadway infrastructure in Seattle that carry more than 60,000 trips per day are I-5 (250,000), I-90 (137,000), the West Seattle Bridge (73,000), the Aurora Bridge (61,000), and Mercer Street (61,000). Link Light Rail carried more than 200,000 trips, and Washington State Ferries carried 46,000. It’s amazing that shared bikes and scooters are carrying trip counts comparable to such massive pieces of transportation infrastructure, especially when you consider that these companies actually pay the city for the privilege. The shared bikes and scooters are also complimentary to our transit services, often helping people access transit stops that would require too long of a walk otherwise. They help further actualize the public transit investments we are already making, expanding their reach to more homes and destinations.

There’s no comprehensive way to measure how many people rode their personal bikes and scooters to the parade, but the number was far above normal. Fremont Bridge bike and scooter trips were up about 40% over other days the same week. We have even less data about the number of people who simply walked to the parade.

The parade gave Seattle a rare opportunity to stress test our transportation network, and it’s clear that walking, biking and transit are the resilient options to keep our city moving under unusual circumstances. The parade was a celebration, but you could also imagine it as a disaster simulation in which we need to move a lot of people amid a significant disruption to our city’s infrastructure (in this case, 4th Avenue through downtown became impassible). Whether we are planning for major events, future increases in daily commuting or responding to a disaster, it’s important to prioritize our resilient modes of transportation.

Lime is the big winner from the parade, aside from the Seahawks of course. The company showed that its service thrives in the most difficult transportation conditions. The numbers, which are also impressive on non-parade days, further support expanding the availability of designated bike and scooter parking areas such as SDOT’s bike corral plan for Pioneer Square. On-street corrals fit perfectly near street corners where car parking is already illegal, improving crosswalk safety by keeping sight lines clear while also providing space for parking bikes and scooters away from crowded sidewalks. SDOT plans to use the special Pioneer Square Preservation Board-approved bike rack design in the corrals, but the board is still pushing back on the plan.

Bike and scooter share is a serious part of Seattle’s transportation system, and it will play a significant role in getting people to and from World Cup events.

Despite all the attention and investments, Uber, Lyft and robo taxis collapse under the same conditions that snarl roadways for personal cars. Robo taxis, which get so much attention and investment, actually block roadways during disaster scenarios. If a Lime fails to unlock, then the user needs to walk or take transit instead. If a robo taxi stops working, it becomes a giant roadblock. If the robo taxi network stops working, they become a fleet of roadblocks across the city. Imagine that happening after a major earthquake, blocking buses, emergency vehicles and people driving private cars. Even outside a disaster scenario, robo taxis also snarl roadways near venues following major events as many people all call them to the same area at the same time. It’s not a solution that scales well in a dense city.

It’s so odd to watch so much attention and money pour into concepts that keep failing to address our transportation issues while we have this other solution that is succeeding beyond anyone’s imagination but keeps getting ignored. Pronto bike share carried 278,000 rides during its two and a half years of operation a decade ago, and Lime just carried 20% of that total in a single day. This is worth celebrating.

#SEAbikes #Seattle

The Lime + transit hack explained: How to get a Lime ride and 3 transit tickets for $1.66*

Yesterday, I took a Lime scooter to U District Station, then took light rail to Mountlake Terrace, then back to the U District several hours later, and it only cost $1.66 total.* I did not cheat or dodge any fares, and I did not use any low-income discount transit programs such as ORCA Lift. Instead I used the confusing Transit GO app and jumped through some oddly specific hoops to activate a pair of in-app promotions that turned my $1.66 Lime ride into rewards worth $10 in transit tickets. Users can activate these promotions up to five times per week.

The catch is that you are going to have to deal with some headaches getting it all set up, and using the Transit GO app is not nearly as convenient as beeping an ORCA card. Here’s how it works:

• Download the Transit GO app for iOS or Android and create an account.
• Download the Lime app (Bird should also work, though I have not tested it) and create or log into your account.
• In the Transit GO app, go to the Rewards tab and connect your Lime account. This process may be annoying.
• Ride a Lime bike or scooter at least 0.25 miles to one of these specific parking areas and end your trip like normal. This only works in those exact designated parking spots. To get the $1.66 price, you must subscribe to Lime Prime ($6/mo) and your ride must also be shorter than 5 minutes. The promotions also work with regular Lime or Bird pricing.
• If you have parked correctly, you will receive 300 points in the Transit GO app. There is no notification that anything has happened, but you should see your reward balance increase by 300. You must then redeem your points for a transit ticket from within the Rewards tab of the app (light rail costs 300 points, King County Metro costs 275) and activate it within 24 hours of your eligible bike/scooter ride.
• If you don’t see your ticket in the Use tab, tap “refresh screen.” Activate the ticket before riding.
• After activating your ticket, you will get another 700 points added to your rewards balance. The app says you can use this for a Lime or Bird trip, though you can also just keep buying transit tickets with it.

A light rail day pass is 600 points so if you are going to be traveling up and down the 1 and 2 lines a lot you can just get one of those. You can also use points for tickets on the King County Water Taxi, Kitsap Transit and Fast Ferries, the Sounder, or even the Seattle Streetcar. It appears that Bird users can maybe stockpile their reward points as account credit (I have not tried this yet, so comment below if you have) while Lime only offers $7 discounts on a ride for 700 points, which should be good for about a half hour of ride time. However, when I tried to paste the promo code into the Lime app, it said the code had already expired even though I had just redeemed it moments earlier. Maybe this function is broken? I’ll update if I learn more, but for now I’ll just use the reward points on transit tickets.

This is all possible due to some kind of partnership between the transit agencies, the bike and scooter companies, and a company called Velocia that specializes in transit reward programs. A quote attributed to King County Metro on the Velocia website states, “Velocia has provided King County Metro with a unique opportunity to deliver personalized incentive to riders, with the flexibility to test various incentives and determine which campaigns most effectively increase ridership.”

Using the Transit GO app is a horrible experience up to the point that you get free transit, which is obviously great. Nearly every review from recent years on the iOS app store is 1 star, with people complaining of bugs, difficultly making payments and general confusion. I ran into several bugs trying to log in with an existing Transit GO account and linking my Lime account, but I persisted and got them working after repeat attempts. Then once you redeem a transit ticket, it doesn’t include transfers between agencies. You must redeem separate tickets if you are going from light rail to a bus or vice versa. If you are simply looking for a way to buy transit fare, I highly recommend getting an ORCA card and using the myORCA app to add money or set-up autopay. But if you are looking for a cheap transit hack, well, Transit GO has got you covered in this highly specific scenario.

The hack, and “hack” really does feel like the right word here even though it is all working as designed, is not even new. The reward promotions I used have been offered off and on for several years. I wrote a story about a similar promo back in 2022 but when I went to test it out for a follow-up story I found the Transit GO app so buggy that I just gave up and never wrote it. But with Lime’s new subscription-based pricing scheme, the prospect of getting multiple transit rides and a Lime ride for $1.66 inspired me to give it another try. Even paying the more common $3.14 (after tax) for a Lime ride up to 20 minutes is still on par with a single adult transit fare. Had I used my standard adult fare ORCA card yesterday like I usually do, the journey would have cost me $7.66 ($1.66 for Lime + $6 for two $3 adult fares). If I had not subscribed to Lime Prime ($6/mo), the trip would have cost about $8.88. Not only did my trip cost a fraction of full price, but I was left with a surplus of 400 reward points to use later.

Do I recommend trying this yourself? If you have the patience to deal with a buggy app, then yes. Get in on it while it lasts. Combining bike/scooter share with transit is amazing, and this promo somehow makes it cheaper to take Lime or Bird to transit than it is to walk there. Does any of this make sense? Not a lick. I would much prefer if the pricing were somewhere in the middle of full price and the promo price but the user process was easy and straight-forward. It would be amazing to be able to beep my ORCA card to start a bike ride, and then maybe some fare transfer could occur behind the scenes. The idea of bike/scooter fares and transit fares having some kind of transfer synergy is great, and the bike/scooter companies and transit agencies all have incentives to encourage linking the two modes (in many places around the world, transit agencies run the bike share system). Tying the reward to using a designated parking space is also a decent idea to encourage better parking, though I think they could ease up the restrictions a bit and give the reward for any ride that ends with a properly parked bike or scooter near a transit station. It’s not obvious to users which specific spots count, and I was stymied on my first attempt after ending my ride at a bike rack across the street from the station that did not count and gave no reward points.

* The $1.66 price is what it cost me on that day for that trip, but I also paid $6 for a monthly Lime Prime subscription. To get a final price, I would have to take that $6 and factor a portion of it into the cost of every ride I take during the month. So the actual cost of the ride is $1.66 plus some variable amount. If a user used the promo the maximum number of 5 times per week, then each ride would cost about $1.93.

#SEAbikes #Seattle

After pricing overhaul, 20-minute bike and scooter rides now cost the same as transit fare for LimePrime subscribers

Lime’s newest pricing scheme makes it far more cost-effective for regular users to use their bikes and scooters for short trips, making the service much more useful as an everyday mode of transportation. The new scheme puts the cost of a 20-minute ride on par with a full-price adult transit single-ride fare of $3 while lowering the cost of rides under 5 minutes to $1.50. The pricing change comes as the number of bike and scooter rides in Seattle in the past year topped 10 million and continue to rise, according to data the company submits to SDOT.

Subscribers to the $6 per month LimePrime membership now pay a flat rate of $2.85 plus tax for rides up to 20 minutes with no unlock fee. That’s about the price of a 4-minute ride under their regular pricing ($1 to unlock plus 47¢ per minute). LimePrime rides up to 5 minutes will be $1.50, and rides longer than 20 minutes are charged a reduced rate of 28¢ per minute. Under the default rate, a 20-minute ride would cost $10.40, 3.7 times higher than the LimePrime rate.

Let’s say someone lives a 20-minute bike or scooter ride from a light rail station, the most favorable condition for the new pricing scheme. They could now spend $120 per month to take Lime to and from the station five days a week. That’s not exactly cheap, but under the previous per-minute pricing scheme the same use would have cost $416.

The default per-minute rate is rarely the cheapest option anymore because the 47¢ per minute rate and $1 unlock fees add up very fast whether you’re taking one longer ride or many shorter rides. At 17 minutes under the standard rate, a user has paid the equivalent of one month of LimePrime plus the $2.85 fee for the trip.

Trips under 5 minutes will cost $1.50 instead of $3.35 under regular pricing, which opens up some interesting use cases. I used to love taking the old $1 bike share bikes short little distances around the neighborhood, like going from north Broadway businesses to Pike/Pine businesses or from the Rainier Valley light rail stations on MLK Way to destinations along Rainier Ave. These aren’t the longest walks, but it’s a small joy to just hop on a bike to shrink the neighborhood. I wouldn’t pay $3.35 to bike a half mile, but I might pay $1.50.

The math gets a little more complicated when comparing to the LimePass minute bundles. For example, a single 30-minute ride would cost $5.25 with LimePrime pricing but $7 with a 30-minute LimePass bundle. However, three 10-minute rides in one day would cost $8.55 with LimePrime compared to $7 with a LimePass bundle. So if you rarely take Lime, then the minute bundles are still probably the better option (and the 30-minute bundle is nearly always better than paying the default rate). Someone visiting town for a week who is planning to rely largely on biking to get around may also be better off buying the $34 bundle to get 3 hours of riding time and have no worries about forgetting to cancel the monthly subscription. If you really want to pay as little as possible on a long ride, I guess you could stop every 20 minutes to end your ride and then start it again since the effective rate on a 20-minute LimePrime ride is about 14¢ per minute.

Note that people who qualify for a reduced cost ORCA Lift card also qualify for Lime Access, which at 75¢ to unlock plus 1¢ per minute is much more affordable than any of these other pricing options. If transportation costs are a burden on your budget, definitely check to see if you qualify. The threshold is 200% of the federal poverty level, which is higher than many other assistance programs.

The monthly LimePrime subscription is another potential downside of the new pricing scheme. If you end up not really using Lime often, then that’s $6 down the drain every month until you cancel it. The business model for gyms is for people to pay for memberships that they rarely use, and that’s a risk for LimePrime, too. More people committing financially to a single provider could also further erode competition in the market. Currently, Bird is the only other company operating in Seattle, but that could feasibly change in the future. If enough of the user base has a monthly financial commitment with a single company, that could make it harder for another provider to enter the Seattle market. It’s not usually a good thing for consumers when a single company has too much market share because they can then start hiking prices and reducing the quality of service if they no longer need to worry about losing customers. The situation is a little different with Lime since they are also competing with some heavy-hitting and well-established competitors like the bus and walking.

If Seattle gets to the point where Lime is the only viable provider (they are arguably already there considering they have reported carrying about 97% of bike and scooter share trips in Seattle in 2025), then perhaps an open permit system would no longer make the most sense for the city. Lime carries a massive number of trips around Seattle, and it is an important part of city’s transportation system. If Lime were instead granted a contract or license as the sole provider, the change could open up options for the city to negotiate more public benefits such as investing in a public-private roadmap for shifting to corral-only parking. This could finally deal with the problem of bikes and scooters blocking walkways and curb ramps by only allowing users to end trips within designated parking areas. Such a concept would only work with a massive expansion of bike and scooter parking. I don’t know the exact density required to make it work without significantly degrading the bike and scooter experience, but I imagine it could be on the scale of creating a bike and scooter parking corral at every single intersection in every business district. Residential parking is maybe even trickier due to the sheer scale of how many residential intersections there are in the city. However, there is an added safety benefit to physically restricting parking 20 feet before every street corner (30 if there’s a stop light or sign) as is already state law (with very few exceptions, street corners are crosswalks whether marked with stripes or not). I know in my neighborhood this law is never followed, and cars parked too close to the intersection can create safety hazards by blocking sight lines (“They darted out from behind a parked car!”).

To deal with the overwhelming scale of the task, perhaps the city and Lime could partner on a progressive roll-out concept to go neighborhood-by-neighborhood implementing new parking areas and intersection daylighting improvements along with new scooter and bike share parking restrictions. It might take a while to get the whole city, but work could be phased according to the need and resources available.

#SEAbikes #Seattle

Tuesday: Community Council forum on ‘scooter public safety’ + It’s time to take bike and scooter share seriously

Seattle was the first major and lasting launch city for Lime back in July 2017, and the city has continued to be one of the company’s strongest markets globally. In the last year (November 2024 through November 2025), Lime and Bird reported an astounding 10.3 million trips in Seattle, according to SDOT’s data dashboard (96% of those trips were on Lime). Over the year, bike and scooter share carried about 60% as many trips as the state’s $2.15 billion SR-99 highway tunnel under downtown Seattle. During summer months, that number may have been more like 80%.

Bike and scooter share is a major part of Seattle’s transportation system today, yet the city still has not fully adapted to support it in a comprehensive manner. While the public subsidizes driving to the tune of billions, these companies actually pay Seattle for permits to operate here. Yet despite some city work to add bike and scooter parking areas in select locations (largely funded by scooter and bike permit fees), the vast majority of the devices are parked on sidewalks wherever users could find a spot. This leads to bikes and scooters blocking walkways, curb cuts and other sidewalk access needs whether due to inconsiderate parking by users or passersby knocking them over. A blocked walkway may be annoying for someone who can step around a fallen device, but it is a serious mobility blockage for people who cannot.

Meanwhile, though the city has been building more protected bike lanes, they are nowhere close to keeping up with the demand for safe bike and scooter routes. The result is the frustrating and persistent problem of people riding scooters on sidewalks. Sidewalk riding is uncomfortable for people walking, and it is also not a good solution for people riding bikes and scooters. Some of the problem may be inconsiderate user habits, but the much bigger problem is a lack of safe bike lanes. You are far more likely to experience someone riding a scooter on a sidewalk along a street filled with car traffic, such as the one where this most often happens to me: NE 45th Street in the U District. Sure, they are supposed to ride in traffic, but have you seen traffic?!?

While bike and scooter share ridership in Seattle is a major success story, problems with sidewalk riding and walkway blockages are a persistent source of justified complaints (along with some over-the-top complaints) that are not going away. The Urban Community Councils of Seattle are hosting a “Scooter Public Safety Forum” 6 p.m. Tuesday (December 2) at Plymouth Church at 6th and University downtown. Unfortunately, the event description only mentions “scooter speeding, sidewalk riding, and parking chaos” and not the safety needs of scooter riders. Hopefully that is also part of the discussion. Here’s the event description:

“Speeding, sidewalk riding, and parking chaos! Join us for a forum with Lime Scooters to talk about steps they are taking to address safety. Scooter safety is top of everyone’s minds these days. Seattle has the third largest Lime ridership in the world and is well-positioned for prioritized solutions. Join us for a presentation and audience Q&A with Lime Scooters on what they are doing to address scooter speeding, sidewalk riding, and parking chaos.”

As with any group, the vast majority of people riding scooters want to behave in a proper manner and would gladly use a safe bike lane if there was one. But when presented with the no-win options of a busy street that feels unsafe or a sidewalk, we cannot be surprised when many people choose the sidewalk. It is human nature to prioritize self-preservation. There are always going to be a few total jerks, especially from a pool of over 10 million rides per year, but most scooter riders just want to get where they’re going like everyone else. This is a mainstream way to get around, and the people riding bike and scooter share are also community members, and I hope Tuesday’s conversation keeps that in mind.

The good news is that we already know the solutions to both the scooter and bike share parking and sidewalk riding problems. For parking, the city needs to install way more parking corrals. We have a mere fraction as many as are needed. Even better, if the city installed enough bike and scooter parking, such as at least one corral at every intersection, then we could change the rules to allow the devices to be parked only within designated areas. I think this is a worthy goal, and it would be great to see the city and the companies work out together what it would take to achieve it.

For sidewalk riding the answer is also obvious: Bike lanes. This is a serious mode of transportation, and it needs dedicated space. Bike lanes not only reduce sidewalk riding, they are also part of street safety projects that can dramatically improve crosswalk safety. Likewise, on-street bike and scooter corrals can be located in the space where it is already illegal to park a car, further improving crosswalk safety by daylighting intersections so people driving can better see people about the cross the street. This strategy was a huge part of how Hoboken, New Jersey, has gone 8 years without a traffic fatality. Seattle has had success with on-street corrals, too, but we need way, way, way more of them. Every commercial intersection would be a start, and there could even be two or four of them at each intersection to cover all the approaches.

We are still thinking too small about bike and scooter use. It is unreasonable to expect that painting some rectangles on the sidewalk should be enough to handle the huge and increasing number of trips they are carrying around our city. We invest billions in public dollars and reserve the vast majority of public space in order to move people and goods around our city and region, and we need to be willing to dedicate resources to bikes and scooters, as well.

There are more scooters than there used to be

Does it feel like there are more scooters and bikes out there these days? It’s not your imagination, but it’s for a good reason. When Lime added about 2,600 sit-down scooters in May the city did not require them to remove stand-up scooters or bikes to maintain a total fleet count. The sit-down scooters are designed to be more accessible so people who are not able or comfortable riding a bike or stand-up scooter are still able to use Lime to get around. However, stand-up scooters remain the most profitable device type, so if the city required companies to choose between them, profit would direct companies to prioritize stand-up scooters. By allowing an additional allotment, Lime was able to add sit-down scooters without cannibalizing their own business. The data suggests it has been a success.

Lime’s record-smashing year saw a 4.29 million ride increase over the previous year, thanks in part to the company’s rollout of their Glider sit-down scooters (they did a small test starting in late 2024, but didn’t add them in significant numbers until May and June 2025). Lime-reported data shows that users took 6.73 million stand-up scooter trips (about 6,600 deployed), 1.78 million sit-down scooter trips (about 2,600 deployed starting in May) and 1.4 million bike trips (about 3,100 deployed). They are still new enough that we don’t yet know how long the devices will last or how ridership trends will develop, but it seems like they slot in well between bikes and stand-up scooters.

Perhaps most tellingly, adding Gliders did not result in a reduction in stand-up scooter and bike trips, which both saw record ridership on their own. This suggests that Seattle is still in the phase where adding devices results in an even larger increase in ridership, a phenomenon that became very well-known back during the first dockless bike share boom that started in China nearly a decade ago. Companies observed this pattern and responded by adding more and more bikes until the sheer volume of bikes overwhelmed cities, resulting in world-famous photos of towering piles of bike share bikes. SDOT’s strategy for avoiding such a problem was to issue permits that limited the number of devices a company could operate at any given time. This artificial limit means that we do not know what Seattle’s bike and scooter ride ceiling might be if we found a way to responsibly add more devices to the streets. It’s pretty exciting to consider the potential, especially if rides were also more affordable. Perhaps the city could work out a deal to make rides more affordable in return for significant new public investment in bike and scooter parking. The city already requires a reduced cost program for folks who qualify (including anyone with an ORCA Lyft card), but ride prices are also a bit steep for middle-income folks who might otherwise make it a regular part of their transportation habits.

#SEAbikes #Seattle

The micromobility firm Lime is offering free rides to voters in the US

#ebikes #escooters #micromobility #bikeshare #scootershare #evs #earlyvoting #electricvehicles #gotv #registrationday #voteearlyday #elections2024 #voters #voting #votingrights #elections #usa #voterregistration #democracy #democracies #government #publicinformation #psa #esg #csr #socialresponsibility #civicresponsibility

https://cleantechnica.com/2024/09/18/e-bikes-e-scooters-to-rescue-stranded-voters-for-free/

The micromobility firm Lime is offering free rides to voters in the US

#ebikes #escooters #micromobility #bikeshare #scootershare #evs #earlyvoting #electricvehicles #gotv #registrationday #voteearlyday #elections2024 #voters #voting #votingrights #elections #usa #voterregistration #democracy #democracies #government #publicinformation #psa #esg #csr #socialresponsibility #civicresponsibility

https://cleantechnica.com/2024/09/18/e-bikes-e-scooters-to-rescue-stranded-voters-for-free/

E-bikes, e-scooters, and e-lections: Don't just stand there, do something...

#ebikes #escooters #micromobility #bikeshare #scootershare #evs #earlyvoting #electricvehicles #gotv #registrationday #voteearlyday #elections2024 #voters #voting #votingrights #elections #usa #voterregistration

https://cleantechnica.com/2024/09/18/e-bikes-e-scooters-to-rescue-stranded-voters-for-free/

E-bikes, e-scooters, and e-lections: Don't just stand there, do something...

#ebikes #escooters #micromobility #bikeshare #scootershare #evs #earlyvoting #electricvehicles #gotv #registrationday #voteearlyday #elections2024 #voters #voting #votingrights #elections #usa #voterregistration

https://cleantechnica.com/2024/09/18/e-bikes-e-scooters-to-rescue-stranded-voters-for-free/

I rode Lime’s new sit-down scooter

I took the new Lime Glider sit-down scooter for a test ride a few days before the company rolls 280 of them out in the U District starting for a trial. People can ride them anywhere they want within the Lime service area for the same price as their bikes and scooters, but Lime staff will eventually rebalance them back to the U District during the trial period.

Seattle is the only market getting the Gliders for now, and Lime staff pointed to strong ridership here as well as SDOT’s role as “a well-grounded regulator,” according to Director of Government Relations Hayden Harvey. “They keep up honest, but they are also collaborative in innovating in this industry,” he said.

Lime is positioning the Glider as a more approachable and comfortable device. The step-over height is even lower than on their bikes, and riders can easily keep their feet on the ground before they start moving. Like with a bicycle, the center of balance is further back than on a foot scooter, making it far less likely for a rider to fall forward. But it’s also not a bicycle, which could appeal to people who find bicycling intimidating. Or at least that’s their hope.

Legally speaking, the device is not a bicycle and must follow scooter rules. In Seattle, that means no sidewalk riding “unless there is no alternative for a motorized foot scooter to travel over a sidewalk that is part of a bicycle or pedestrian path.” They can be ridden on roads, bike lanes and paved multi-use trails. Only one person is allowed to ride at a time, though I suspect we’ll be seeing folks trying to squeeze together on the longer seat.

It can climb hills, but it struggles up the really steep ones. My go-to test for all these bikes and scooters has been to climb the absurdly-steep block of Cherry Street between 4th and 5th Avenues. The Glider barely passed, slowing all the way to 4 mph using motor power alone. I ended up using my foot to give it a boost. On flats and more typical hills, it was zippy and easy to ride.

As someone who has ridden every type of device from all the different bike and scooter share companies who have come to Seattle (and some who haven’t), it is most similar to the Veo Cosmo pseudo-bike. Like the Cosmo, the seat height on the Glider is not adjustable, so the experience will vary widely depending on your height. The taller you are, the more reclined you will feel. The main differences are that the Cosmo had pedals (they were mostly useless, but they existed) and front suspension. I also felt comfortable standing on the pedals while riding the Cosmo, but the Glider clearly intends for riders to sit while riding.

Whether these design choices are good or bad thing is entirely subjective. I personally prefer the more upright posture of a bicycle, but I’m someone who rides a bike every day and writes a blog about bicycling so I may not be representative of the wider population. I also have low back issues (I was born with some fused vertebrae) and found the reclined position to be uncomfortable when going over bumps. But again, not everyone has my particular back issues.

Others may find it perfectly comfortable, and being able to ride without worrying about adjusting the saddle height could have its own appeal since it’s one less thing to do before starting a ride. People with certain kinds of joint pain may also find it more comfortable to not need to pedal. Though it’s worth noting that the newest model of Lime e-bikes also have a throttle and can be ridden without pedaling if desired.

Lime has been on an absolute tear in Seattle this year, obliterating their previous ridership records while introducing new and improved devices and lowering prices through their new LimePass pricing scheme. We’ll see if the Glider is able to reach even more people who do not find the foot scooters and bikes appealing. They are already carrying a serious number of trips in Seattle, bringing Lime into the consideration alongside major road and transit investments. As we noted recently, Lime moved about half as many trips in July as the $2 billion SR-99 tunnel in downtown Seattle. These are numbers that seemed like a dream just a few years ago. But as Seattle continues to build out protected bike lanes, especially in and near the city center, more people are using them to get around.

What’s truly wild is that these increases are happening even before the downtown waterfront bike path is open. Once that happens, still scheduled for late this year, it will immediately become one of the most popular bike paths in the whole city. And Lime is going to carry a lot of those trips.

Share

• Mastodon
• Twitter
• Facebook
• Reddit
• Email

#SEAbikes #Seattle