Preprints are bad because we need peer review to ensure quality and integrity of the scientific record. ๐Ÿคฅ๐Ÿ˜œ

๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿค‘ #Elsevier

#ScientificPublishing #SciPub ๐Ÿงช

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4x4id4pf2mryakvmphrpi2eb/post/3moph2kceuc2x
The problem is not APCs, the problem is rent-extraction of #ScientificPublishing by for-profits. It's senseless.

But pay those same APCs to someone like CoB? They'll find their way towards sponsoring conferences, travel awards, studentships, etc...

Nothing wrong with that!

2/2
The TLDR: Impact Inflation tells you when a journal is "punching above their weight", or have an "inflated value" in terms of IF. Golf rules, lower is better. IF is a flawed metric. Impact Inflation normalizes the IF so you can tell what it means. #SciPub #ScientificPublishing

The strain on scientific publi...

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:x6bajgevb6y6m5w6zplsbr35/post/3moll7ze3w22q

@thetransmitter

Scientific publishing has barely adapted to the internet ... but sure likes to profit from LLM-generated papers that bring those sweet APCs.

#ScientificPublishing

@feisty_lemming @jonny

The publisher makes money. Thatโ€™s the value. Why bother with actual scientists (reviewers, editors, readers) if not needed, since all authors need is tokens of progress for career progression. The papers wonโ€™t be read anyway by any committees that will evaluate their CVs.

Some fraction of academia has fallen into a garbage gyrus.

#ScientificPublishing

@SciMag @news-from-science-SciMag

By their own data, the method doesn't work? Also, mesuring novelty is a bad idea to begin with, because novelty is largely unrelated to impact. But the method sure gives publishers something to point to for their decisions, offloading or even dispensing with the need for judgement. Of course Elsevier is interested ...

#ScientificPublishing

The past two months, I helped coordinate the "Phase Transitions..." research semester programme at CWI (https://www.cwi.nl/en/events/research-semester-programmes/phasecap-phase-transitions-in-combinatorics-algorithms-probability/). It ended last Friday, and still I feel "hungover" from the intensive blur of activities/developments/ideas. Very grateful to my team --Feri, Jop, Serte, Carla, Noela, Guus-- we did it!

In parallel, during the same two months, after the dawn of recognition of what has arrived (after a tip from Jeroen), I underwent a kind of phase transition myself. Avowed refusenik in March (see https://mathstodon.xyz/@kangmeister/115252549665766971); an "anti-Gemini" research working group in April; compulsive button-pressing in May. (And yes, I *know* it is easy to set it up for pressing fewer buttons...)

That poetic part of me (or whatever remains of it) is allured by the term, "cognitive surrender", if only to help in my search for the right words to describe the sharp changes underway in various facets of mathematical life/growth.

#CWI #combinatorics #algorithms #probability #conferences #generativeAI #formalization #lean #scientificpublishing

PhaseCAP: Phase Transitions in Combinatorics, Algorithms, Probability

Combinatorics, Algorithms, Probability

Dear scientific publishers:
Please ๐Ÿ›‘ STOP ๐Ÿ›‘ inserting spaces after each period and slash in a #DOI in a reference list.

DOIs are (some sort of) web links, not regular sentences. Therefore, it's doi.org/abc.de, not:
doi. org/ abc. de

#ScientificPublishing

What Counts as Diamond Open Access? China Has Its Own Answer

#ScientificPublishing #DiamondOpenAccess #China

https://doi.org/10.1146/katina-052826-1

What Counts as Diamond Open Access? China Has Its Own Answer.

Diamond OA is frequently associated with Latin America or European community-led initiatives, with China left out of the conversation. It shouldnโ€™t be.

Katina Magazine | Annual Reviews