An editor from a Springer Nature journal, a company that posted $2.1 billion in revenue in 2022 [1], from an industry with double-digit percent profits (~30% [2]), kindly asked me, an academic in the UK where salaries continue to plummet [3], whether I would be pleased to review a paper for them, for free ... so I kindly asked whether they would consider paying me. It is only logical.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Springer_Nature
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science
[3] In UK academia, "Pay has fallen significantly in real terms since 2009, as have pension contributions, and redundancies are rife. Short-term contracts and precarious work arrangements are common, especially for younger staff, as universities struggle to balance their books." https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/28/vice-chancellor-salaries-university-bosses-rich/

#ScientificPublishing #academia

Springer Nature - Wikipedia

@albertcardona any response?

@foaylward

They seldom respond. Not the first time I reply, politely, with this request.

@foaylward

Now I got a response:

"Thanks for sharing your perspective on the review process. I'm not in a position to determine such policies so I will seek other reviewers."

In other words, they are seeking to find another academic who won't object to being exploited for their profitable business that, clearly, depends on the free labour of experts.

#ScientificPublishing