C.
Insurgo Formica
Milcom MiasmaBed rest and medication.
Anybody else got an older family member who calls to tell you that WHEN they hit the lottery, they're going to build a compound and everyone in the family WILL come and live with them there?
No? Okay... just checking.
I've spent the last hour-plus going through more of the "stuff" he links from the overview, and (a) I still have no way to tell if it makes sense or if it's just LLM-generated physics drivel, and (b) I get more and more concerned that "one self-educated non-physicist overturns all of modern physics and solves all outstanding problems", while hypothetically tenable, strains credulity.
I mean, a long history of cranks "disproving" Einstein (dunno why they all hated relativity so much) and Dirac and everything else just screams "This guy is a nutter". The alarm bells are ringing. I really want people who actually understand this stuff to read it and tell me whether I can write this guy off as such a crank.
But weirder things have happened. Einstein was just a clerk in a patent office who no one had heard of when he demonstrated the then-new and completely unsupported-by-evidence quantum theory, which had only been proposed to solve the (ultra)violet catastrophe, could actually explain the completely unrelated and then-unexplained photoelectric effect. He won the Nobel in physics for that - not relativity - and cemented quantum theory in place, even if he never liked it. A nobody who single-handedly stamped the dividing line between classical physics and modern physics.
<brain-exploding>
Frank
Λβ*Β°β’ Papigoe π³οΈβπ π΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώπ³π΄
woollypigs