From Hot Gas to Arguments: How We Got Here

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — April 22, 2026 — 12:35 p.m. PHST

Earth Day Special Bulletin

The Universe Starts Simple

The early universe was mostly hydrogen, with a smaller amount of helium. This is not speculative. Measurements of cosmic background radiation and elemental abundances strongly support this model (Peebles, 1993; Planck Collaboration, 2020). In plain terms, the universe began with very limited ingredients.

Gravity then began to pull that gas together into denser regions. Over time, these regions collapsed into stars. This process is well-documented through direct observation of star-forming regions in space (McKee & Ostriker, 2007).

Stars Build the Periodic Table

Inside stars, nuclear fusion transforms hydrogen into helium. In more massive stars, fusion continues, forming heavier elements such as carbon, oxygen, and silicon. This process is supported by both theoretical models and spectroscopic observations of stellar composition (Burbidge et al., 1957).

When large stars reach the end of their life cycle, they explode as supernovae. These explosions are observed phenomena and are responsible for creating and dispersing heavier elements, including iron and nickel, into space (Woosley & Weaver, 1995).

Without this step, rocky planets would not exist.

From Dust to Planets

New stars form from gas clouds enriched by previous generations of stars. Around these young stars, protoplanetary disks form. These disks have been directly imaged by modern telescopes (Andrews et al., 2009).

Within these disks, particles collide and stick together, gradually forming larger bodies. This process, known as accretion, explains how planets form. While the general model is well-supported, the exact mechanisms by which microscopic dust becomes kilometer-sized planetesimals remain an active area of research (Johansen et al., 2014).

Earth formed as a molten body and gradually cooled. Volcanic outgassing and external impacts contributed to the formation of the atmosphere and oceans. The relative contributions of these sources remain under study (Morbidelli et al., 2000).

Chemistry Becomes Complicated

Once Earth stabilized enough to support liquid water, chemical interactions increased in complexity. Laboratory experiments have shown that organic molecules, including amino acids, can form under conditions similar to early Earth (Miller, 1953).

This part is supported.

What is not yet fully proven is the exact pathway from these molecules to the first self-replicating systems. Several hypotheses exist. The RNA world hypothesis suggests that RNA molecules could store information and catalyze reactions (Gilbert, 1986). Hydrothermal vent theories propose that life may have originated in chemically rich environments on the ocean floor (Martin et al., 2008).

These models are plausible and supported by partial evidence, but no complete, confirmed pathway has been established.

Life Evolves

At some point, replication began. Once that threshold was crossed, evolution by natural selection took over. This framework is strongly supported by fossil records, genetic evidence, and direct observation (Darwin, 1859; Dobzhansky, 1973).

Over billions of years, life diversified. Single-celled organisms gave rise to multicellular life. Plants and animals emerged. Nervous systems developed. Brains evolved.

Eventually, a species emerged capable of abstract thought, communication, and social organization.

From Biology to Behavior

Human beings are a product of this long chain of physical and biological processes. The same atoms formed in stars now make up our bodies. The same evolutionary pressures that shaped early life continue to influence behavior.

The ability to reason, cooperate, and compete all arise from biological systems that evolved over time.

That includes something as modern as political disagreement.

What We Know and What We Don’t

There are still gaps in this story. The origin of life remains unresolved. Planet formation models are still being refined. Early Earth conditions are still debated.

Science does not claim to have every answer.

But the overall framework, from simple elements to complex life, is supported by multiple independent lines of evidence.

Earth Day Context

On Earth Day, the significance of this process becomes clear. Everything on this planet shares a common origin.

The rocks, the oceans, the plants, the animals, and human beings all come from the same sequence of events.

We are not separate from the system. We are one outcome of it.

And that carries a practical implication.

This environment is not easily replaced.

References (APA)

Andrews, S. M., et al. (2009). Protoplanetary disks in Ophiuchus. The Astrophysical Journal, 700(2), 1502–1523.
Burbidge, E. M., et al. (1957). Synthesis of the elements in stars. Reviews of Modern Physics, 29(4), 547–650.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. John Murray.
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.
Gilbert, W. (1986). The RNA world. Nature, 319(6055), 618.
Johansen, A., et al. (2014). The multifaceted planetesimal formation process. Protostars and Planets VI, 547–570.
Martin, W., et al. (2008). Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 6(11), 805–814.
McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, E. C. (2007). Theory of star formation. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 45, 565–687.
Miller, S. L. (1953). A production of amino acids under possible primitive Earth conditions. Science, 117(3046), 528–529.
Morbidelli, A., et al. (2000). Source regions and timescales for the delivery of water to Earth. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 35(6), 1309–1320.
Peebles, P. J. E. (1993). Principles of physical cosmology. Princeton University Press.
Planck Collaboration. (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6.
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995). The evolution and explosion of massive stars. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 101, 181–235.

#astrophysicsBasics #climateScience #earthDay2026 #environmentalAwareness #evolutionBiology #originOfLife #planetaryFormation

They think they're cool (clever) but they're behaving like fools.

The difference between understanding evolutionary biology at some level or another, and not, is that informed people can understand the drivers or motivations that make animals do what they do (including humans. At some level).

An evident motivator that everyone will be aware of is hunger. Hunger is a negative behavioral motivator. Whilst many people in wealthy countries will not have experienced real hunger, at extreme levels hunger will dominate the animal's mind (as would thirst). The animal would be "obsessed" with trying to find food (I acknowledge the anthropomorphization of "obsessed". However, a feeling of angst that focuses the animal's attention on finding food). Basically, the feelings associated with hunger are adaptations. If an animal was born that did not feel hunger, it would die - it would not pass on that behavior to the next generation (Although, if that animal was a human, a baby, carers could make sure that the youngster eat enough food).

Humans are no exception (though some delude themselves otherwise. A form of narcissism or ego), humans are also driven by feelings (emotions or instincts). For example, many humans take part in relatively foolishly dangerous behaviors because they are "showing off". Whilst any human can "show off", (many) men tend to dominate in the showing off by taking part in stupidly reckless activities department. Showing off is status-seeking behavior. For example, showing off resources such as expensive sports cars. Showing off by, in their minds, showing off their driving skills by driving cars fast or riding motorbikes fast. If the car or motorbike has a relatively loud engine, well, that's another way to show their status (perhaps they perceive that some people look at them because they're cool - rather than thinking they're simply noisy irritating fools).

So, what they don't realize is that they're actually acting like fools. They think they're cool but they're behaving like fools. Fundamentally, they're being idiots. Their dangerous driving is risking the safety of other people for no reason - other than to show off (an instinct - which is now a maladaptation). Of course, many adult males, as they mature, may come to realize that their risk-taking behaviors are simply not worth it. However, that realization (learning or maturity) takes a level of intelligence. Some adult males never grow up (they just look older).

Risk-taking behaviors are particularly dangerous when, for example, many adults are voting in a democracy. For example, they may ignore the medical advice about wearing face masks during a pandemic or the scientific warnings about climate change. Apparently, face masks aren't macho enough!

So, how do we mitigate the fools thinking their cool social psychological phenomenon? We try to educate more people about evolutionary psychology so that they recognize stupid when they see it.

Evolutionary Psychology - The New Science of the Mind https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429061417

#adaptation #psychology #EvolutionBiology #EvolutionaryPsychology #SocialPsychology #health #education #sports #cars #motobikes #democracy

#maladaptation #mutation #SarCov2 #covid #pandemic #climate #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis

Evolutionary Psychology | The New Science of the Mind | David Buss | T

Where did we come from? What is our connection with other life forms? What are the mechanisms of mind that define what it means to be a human being?

Taylor & Francis
Registration - CPEG2023

3RD CROSSING THE PALAEONTOLOGICAL - ECOLOGICAL GAP - CPEG – CPEG2023

CPEG2023
The Ghost in the Machine - The Hermetic Library Blog

Hermetic Library Fellow T Polyphilus reviews The Ghost in the Machine: The Urge to Self-Destruction: A Psychological and Evolutionary Study of Modern Man’s Predicament [Amazon, Bookshop, Abebooks, Publisher, Local Library] by Arthur Koestler. Arthur Koestler’s The Ghost in the Machine is offered as a somewhat downbeat counterpart to his immediately previous book The Act of Creation, which I have not […]

The Hermetic Library Blog