Is Having Hearing Loss Fundamentally Different? Multigroup... : Ear and Hearing
y aimed to examine the relationship between cognitive functioning, aging, and speech-in-noise, in a group of older normal-hearing persons and older persons with hearing loss who wear hearing aids.
Design:
We analyzed data from 199 older normal-hearing individuals (mean age = 61.2) and 200 older individuals with hearing loss (mean age = 60.9) using multigroup structural equation modeling. Four cognitively related tasks were used to create a cognitive functioning construct: the reading span task, a visuospatial working memory task, the semantic word-pairs task, and Raven’s progressive matrices. Speech-in-noise, on the other hand, was measured using Hagerman sentences. The Hagerman sentences were presented via an experimental hearing aid to both normal hearing and hearing-impaired groups. Furthermore, the sentences were presented with one of the two background noise conditions: the Hagerman original speech-shaped noise or four-talker babble. Each noise condition was also presented with three different hearing processing settings: linear processing, fast compression, and noise reduction.
Results:
Cognitive functioning was significantly related to speech-in-noise identification. Moreover, aging had a significant effect on both speech-in-noise and cognitive functioning. With regression weights constrained to be equal for the two groups, the final model had the best fit to the data. Importantly, the results showed that the relationship between cognitive functioning and speech-in-noise was not different for the two groups. Furthermore, the same pattern was evident for aging: the effects of aging on cognitive functioning and aging on speech-in-noise were not different between groups.
Conclusion:
Our findings revealed similar cognitive functioning and aging effects on speech-in-noise performance in older normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners. In conclusion, the findings support the Ease of Language Understanding model as cognitive processes play a critical role in speech-in-noise independent from the hearing status of elderly individuals.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The research was supported by three grants: the Linnaeus Centre HEAD excellence center grant (349-2007-8654) from the Swedish Research Council, a program grant from FORTE (2012-1693), awarded to JR as PI, and a grant from the Swedish Research Council, awarded to Dr. Fridberger (VR-2017-06092). All authors contributed equally to this work. JR designed the project, and the main conceptual ideas (i.e., the n200 study). All authors contributed to the formalization of the model tested in the manuscript. EM prepared the data, carried out the data analysis, and wrote the original draft (except for the Methods section, which VS wrote). JR and HD supervised the project. HD assisted with the data analysis. JR, HD, VS, and SM authors contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript.
The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
Received March 31, 2021; accepted November 27, 2021
Address for correspondence: Erik Marsja, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, S-581 83, Linköping, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved....