@afriendlykittycat Think about it this way.

Maried couples get bored of staring at and onto each other's bodies so they made a diversion that traditionally extended their safe network of touchable people they would get no ill effects from making prolonged contact with, if needs converged together. And so, swinger culture (traditional orgies) were born.

And this remained stable right until someone (from government) decided to test the waters by sticking their nose in as an official where it wasn't actually wanted. By giving the symptom of actual swingers a reason to forego a need to hide in secret and be literally openly gay if they wanted to.

And then you know what else happened? If it worked on the outside, it should work on the inside as well. So the same political official, decided to add outer and inner change to that optional form of sex bending...and thus the modern LGBT was born.

The thing is, that didn't go over so well with the trans community. So to hide the fact that same sex couples had to be mixed in with couples with opposite gender roles, they added the + in there with a couple extra swinger replacement labels to try to fake the fact that the original swinger orgy club lost the second preferences of one night stands or longer had a political excuse to not bee so ounderground.

But the truth of the matter, is that the lgbt added 2s (standing for two-spirited characters or to add support for multiple personality disorder individuals) q (which adds support for gender fluid and gender bender supporters) i (which adds support for intersexual people that prioritizes individuals belonging to multiple communities, like gay and transgender) and a (for either parasexual or antisexual individuals that observe but don't participate in lewd acts) to represent as many political groups of human separated unification because they weren't straight white Christian nationalists on paper essentially, which turned the movement into the fringe group we know of today as being the mixed bag of lunacy rights groups once again weaponize, because if you don't support the entire entity that came from a forced communion of other groups which were otherwise separate, you're seen as by that entity, an untouchable. Which made the false label of this status, completely iradicate the remembrance and commemoration of what traditional swinger culture stood for. And the reason this happened is because the government couldn't make any money off of couples turning into safe threesomes.

#ChangeMyMind

What's now become apparent, is that people are confusing the + with parasexuality itself. And so, drag, (without the official d designation) is running as a cover for parasexual people to unofficially find communion (think furries, pedophiles, zoosexuals, sadists, and necrophiles among other sub minority fetish groups) think the + is their right to fame as well. Germany in fact had an entire to-do going on about that in the mid 2010's and that's the reason why in the first Trump administration, every state in the union started going after the parasexual groups first because it garnered more support to classify the entire paramovement as a villain before going after the rest in his second term by trying to state that the original lgbt supporters want nothing to do with those other movements prioritizing incestuous relations. And they'd be largely correct in this way to do so, because BD/SM culture would otherwise have completely gone away. But in order to make it a fetish to make money off of it, the government decided to weaponize how people fuck and not just how they do it, but why, and who they do it with. Making the entire experience clinically problematic for modern day dating sites.

And now, they're all out banding with terrorist and LGBT hackers to enforce the narrative that you must support the organization that gives you space to breathe if you ever had an interest in swinger culture, because we're the people running the government whether you like it or not. the alternatives being people who won't let you have space at all, if you don't support us, referencing their own view of straight, Christian white nationalists. Because of course, people of color had to find a way to be weaponized as well but because so many of them are traditionals they had to not be included as a c designation in the lgbt movement that some government official a couple decades ago decided to make some ridiculous amount of money from.

You see how this works?

Everything woke turns to shit because it took away privacy first, freedom second and choice third in one fell swoop in order to make money from it. No other reason.

So the next time someone makes a distinction between this group or that, I point them to the earliest form of safe sex bonding which was inclusive by nature and free to do because the only ones who ever got labeled prostitutes had a sexually transmitted disease who couldn't take care of themselves due to being addicted to street culture and true homelessness.

I will never ever support the commercialized pride movement for this reason. Not because I don't want people to not be proud, but because that happens in the bedrom not necessarily outside of it for making money off of identification, rather than preference by taking the individual person out of the equation.

this is why interchangeably the omnisexual, pansexual and polysexual movement is a cheap knock off of bisexuality which references the same ideology but in a lesser, more pallotable form. And it is pretty much at most what swinger culture called, the fringe binge as a result.

Know your history and stay informed.