@johnwehrle I'm defending the notion of effective and fact-based criticism here, not longtermism ...

... but note that the term "existential risk" LONG predates the emergence of "longtermism", and through 2000 is also far more prevalent. See screenshot, and note that "longtermism" is multiplied 3x to scale equivalently to "existential risk".

I've strong concerns with any argument which leans heavily on such readily-refuted claims. The viewpoint may well be justified, but a bit less hyperventilating hyperbole and poor scholarship would greatly help the case.

The notion of "existential risk" was originally applied in a religious context (by Paul Tillich) and to nuclear weapons.

See:

• Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (1946): https://www.google.com/books/edition/Bulletin_of_the_Atomic_Scientists/KLMhAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22existential+risk%22&dq=%22existential+risk%22&printsec=frontcover
• Tillich reference / religious context (1959): https://www.google.com/books/edition/American_Scientist/8-9UAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22existential+risk%22&dq=%22existential+risk%22&printsec=frontcover

#longtermism #ExistentialRisk #GoogleNgramViewer #Ngrams #WeakArguments #EmilePTorres